Vaporized pot means a higher high

November 30, 2018 by Dennis Thompson, Healthday Reporter

(HealthDay)—A smokeless method of vaporizing and then inhaling pot packs a much more powerful punch than simply smoking weed, researchers say.

That could raise safety concerns for users—driving, for example.

Marijuana vaporizers heat pot to a temperature just below combustion, allowing people to inhale the intoxicating chemical THC from the plant material without breathing in any smoke.

This method produced much more intoxication in a small group of test participants than smoking the same amount of marijuana through a typical pot pipe, according to the report published online Nov. 30 in JAMA Network Open.

The study participants also had more associated with their pot use when they used vaporizers, and had more pronounced impairment of their ability to think and control their movements, the researchers said.

"It's often a fine line between someone getting the drug effect they desire and having a drug effect that's too strong, and maybe produces paranoia and adverse effects that are uncomfortable for the person," said lead researcher Tory Spindle.

"That sort of thing might be more likely with vaporizers," he added. Spindle is a postdoctoral research fellow at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, in Baltimore.

These vaporizers aren't to be confused with "vaping"—a term used to describe electronic cigarettes.

Survey data has shown that vaporizing is becoming a more popular method of using pot, particularly in states that have legalized recreational use of the drug, Spindle said.

"It heats it to a temperature that doesn't reach combustion," Spindle said of the vaporizing devices. "If you look at the cannabis after it's done vaporizing, it doesn't turn into the black ash material it would when you smoke it. It looks exactly like it did when you put it in."

To see if vaporizers deliver a different high than smoking pot, Spindle and his colleagues recruited 17 healthy adults who were not frequent marijuana users and asked them to both smoke pot from a pipe and inhale the fumes produced by a vaporizer.

The same 25-milligram dose of pot produced a significantly stronger high when vaporized than when smoked, the findings showed. Pre-rolled joints sold at dispensaries typically contain 1 gram of pot.

People on vaporized pot also showed greater impairment than when they smoked the drug, based on testing that gauges the ability to think, reason and perform fine motor skills.

Vaporized pot came with more side effects as well, including heart racing (24 percent versus 18 percent for smoked), paranoia (17 percent versus 10 percent), hunger (38 percent versus 33 percent), dry mouth (67 percent versus 43 percent), and red eyes (25 percent versus 16 percent).

Blood tests revealed that people had much higher levels of THC in their circulation after using a vaporizer, about 14.4 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) of blood compared with 10.2 ng/mL when they smoked pot.

The effects typically wore off between six to eight hours for both vaporized and smoked pot, the researchers said.

Heating but not burning pot appears to ensure that more of the weed's high-producing chemicals are imbibed by the user, Spindle said.

"Our theory is that when you combust cannabis, more of the THC is lost due to the combustion process," Spindle said. "The vaporizer is a more efficient delivery method than the smoked cannabis."

People who don't use marijuana regularly should approach vaporizers with caution, said Nadia Solowij, a professor at the University of Wollongong in Australia.

"There is a perception that it is a safer route given that it avoids burning the plant matter, thus reducing toxins formed by that process," said Solowij, who wrote an editorial accompanying the new study. "These findings raise concerns for inexperienced users, which include those using [pot] both recreationally but also trying cannabis for medical reasons," she added.

"It may be wise to use a smaller amount of cannabis in a vaporizer to achieve the desired effect," Solowij concluded.

Explore further: Teens who've tried marijuana have used it in more than one form

More information: Tory Spindle, Ph.D., postdoctoral research fellow, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore; Nadia Solowij, Ph.D., professor, University of Wollongong, Australia; Nov. 30, 2018, JAMA Network Open, online

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about the health effects of marijuana.

Related Stories

Teens who've tried marijuana have used it in more than one form

September 28, 2018
Most teens who've tried marijuana have used the drug in more than one form, including cannabis products that are smoked, eaten or vaped, new USC research shows.

Secondhand pot smoke found in kids' lungs

November 19, 2018
(HealthDay)—If you're a pot-smoking parent and you think your kids aren't affected, think again.

Stroke rates higher among pot users

October 19, 2018
(HealthDay)—As the use of marijuana is growing, with Canada legalizing the drug just this week, a new study that ties pot to a raised risk for stroke might give users pause.

Cigarette smokers are 10 times more likely to be daily marijuana users

November 30, 2017
Daily marijuana use has been on the rise over the past decade. Now, a new study by researchers at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health and the Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University ...

Secondhand marijuana smoke causes asthma symptoms in child allergic to cannabis

November 16, 2018
It's well established that secondhand smoke from cigarettes is a risk to anyone who suffers from asthma. New research being presented at the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) Annual Scientific Meeting ...

Survey finds 2M US teens are vaping marijuana

September 17, 2018
A school-based survey shows nearly 1 in 11 U.S. students have used marijuana in electronic cigarettes, heightening health concerns about the new popularity of vaping among teens.

Recommended for you

Teens get more sleep with later school start time, researchers find

December 12, 2018
When Seattle Public Schools announced that it would reorganize school start times across the district for the fall of 2016, the massive undertaking took more than a year to deploy. Elementary schools started earlier, while ...

Large restaurant portions a global problem, study finds

December 12, 2018
A new multi-country study finds that large, high-calorie portion sizes in fast food and full service restaurants is not a problem unique to the United States. An international team of researchers found that 94 percent of ...

Receiving genetic information can change risk

December 11, 2018
Millions of people in the United States alone have submitted their DNA for analysis and received information that not only predicts their risk for disease but, it turns out, in some cases might also have influenced that risk, ...

Yes please to yoghurt and cheese: The new improved Mediterranean diet

December 11, 2018
Thousands of Australians can take heart as new research from the University of South Australia shows a dairy-enhanced Mediterranean diet will significantly increase health outcomes for those at risk of cardiovascular disease ...

Effect of oral alfacalcidol on clinical outcomes in patients without secondary hyperparathyroidism

December 11, 2018
Treatment with active vitamin D did not decrease cardiovascular events in kidney patients undergoing hemodialysis, according to a research group in Japan. They have reported their research results in the December 11 issue ...

Licence to Swill: James Bond's drinking over six decades

December 10, 2018
He may be licensed to kill but fictional British secret service agent James Bond has a severe alcohol use disorder, according to an analysis of his drinking behaviour published in the Medical Journal of Australia's Christmas ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RichManJoe
5 / 5 (2) Nov 30, 2018
This is supposed to be new? It has been known for years in northern California.
koitsu
not rated yet Dec 01, 2018
This is supposed to be new? It has been known for years in northern California.


Now confirmed by science!
Surveillance_Egg_Unit
3 / 5 (2) Dec 02, 2018
With all the chimps and mice that are available as test animals, they had to use humans as guinea pigs instead?

To see if vaporizers deliver a different high than smoking pot, Spindle and his colleagues recruited 17 healthy adults who were not frequent marijuana users and asked them to both smoke pot from a pipe and inhale the fumes produced by a vaporizer.


OK, mice already have red eyes; and the other side effects may not be visible in chimps and mice. But the humans used as test animals would most likely continue the testing even though the official tests have ended. But that is their choice.
What fools these mortals be - Puck
Anonym
not rated yet Dec 02, 2018
Boiling this down, what they concluded was that inhaling heated pot delivers more THC than throwing it on a bonfire. But it should be noted that a joint is not the same delivery system as a pipe: a joint only requires that the tip be combusted, most of the material in the tube is then carboxylized by the sub-combustion level heat from the coal.

The writer confuses pipes and joints, and further muddles things by asserting that this experiment should serve as a warming to drivers. It needn't. The more important effect to consider for drivers is saturation: Experienced pot smokers don't really get super "high," they get "maintenance." Newbies may be "impaired," old stoners are "adjusted." But then newbies are always impaired in some way by their inexperience.

The bad-driving meme is a Prohibitionists' shibboleth. Seems like it ought to be true. But it isn't. Early adopter states have seen auto accident fatality rates fall after legalization.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.