Researching the successes and challenges of digital medical devices

Researcher takes a look at the successes and challenges of digital medical devices
A medical selfie of tissues taken using a smartphone connected to an ultrasound probe. The quality of images is equivalent to those taken with a hospital ultrasound machine. Credit: E.J. Topol et al., Science Translational Medicine (2019)

Eric Topol, a cardiologist and digital medical researcher, and also director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, has published a Focus piece in the journal Science Translational Medicine discussing the short history of digital medical devices, covering both success stories and current challenges.

The type of digital medical devices Topol addresses are the kinds people can use without assistance from medical personnel. They include devices that can take blood pressure measurements or count steps. He suggests the starting point for such devices was the introduction of the smartphone in 2007, a mere 12 years ago. He notes that over that short time span, engineers have created ever more powerful devices, which he finds both encouraging and disconcerting.

Allowing people to monitor aspects of their own health in in the real world is, of course, a good thing. But he notes that many such devices are not properly vetted through clinical trials. He also notes that one of the most exciting areas of current research surrounds the development of imaging applications—devices that can attach to a smartphone, for example, that can be used to perform ultrasound examinations.

Topol notes that biosensors have proliferated in recent years, partly due to work by companies that design them and partly due to the willingness of the USFDA to readily approve such devices. He also notes that the FDA's Digital Health Action Plan plays a role, ensuring that all Americans have access to the best digital health care products available. Part of that effort has been the establishment of site-less digital in which participants test a device in the real world rather than in a controlled environment. He reports that such testing has not always met with great success—in one trial, for example, a group of participants tested a that showed an improvement in self-reported adherence to prescribed hypertension medications. But it did not lead to lowered blood pressure.

Topol points out that as digital medical devices evolve, it is likely that the time will come when they will need to consider more than just one physical feature—they will have to take a more full-bodied approach. And that will most certainly involve the development of machine-learning applications, which entail ethical issues. He notes also that as such devices improve, researchers must deal with the massive amounts of data they will generate, and how to keep it all private.

Explore further

Keeping children safe in the 'Internet of Things' age

More information: Eric J. Topol. A decade of digital medicine innovation, Science Translational Medicine (2019). DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw7610
Journal information: Science Translational Medicine

© 2019 Science X Network

Citation: Researching the successes and challenges of digital medical devices (2019, June 27) retrieved 24 May 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors