Outcomes across nonmelanoma skin cancer treatments similar

Outcomes across nonmelanoma skin cancer treatments similar

(HealthDay)—Outcomes for nonmelanoma skin cancers are similar at one year, regardless of treatment type, although cosmetic results vary, according to a review published in the Oct. 15 issue of Cancer.

Charles T. Lee, Pharm.D., M.D., from the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, and colleagues conducted a systematic literature review to compare the cosmesis and recurrence rates of conventional excision (CE), Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or brachytherapy (BT) for and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.

The researchers identified 24 CE, 13 MMS, 19 EBRT, and seven BT studies that included a total of 21,371 patients. For CE, EBRT, and BT, respectively, the summary effect size for "good" cosmesis was 81.0, 74.6, and 97.6 percent, respectively. Only one MMS study reported cosmesis, which had a "good" classification of 96.0 percent. BT had better "good" cosmesis than EBRT, but was similar to CE and MMS. There were no significant differences seen for "fair" or "poor" cosmesis. Overall, one-year recurrence rates were low (0.8, 0.2, 2.0, and 0 percent for CE, MMS, EBRT, and BT, respectively).

"For T1-T2N0 cancers, BT and MMS have improved cosmesis over EBRT and CE," the authors write. "It is unclear whether this is because of treatment superiority or selection and reporting bias."


Explore further

Aesthetics of skin cancer therapy may vary by treatment type

More information: Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Journal information: Cancer

Copyright © 2019 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Outcomes across nonmelanoma skin cancer treatments similar (2019, October 23) retrieved 14 December 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-10-outcomes-nonmelanoma-skin-cancer-treatments.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
3 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments