Adjusting FRAX estimates to account for site of recent fracture

bone fracture
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A prior fracture is a well-documented risk factor for future fracture, with the risk highest in the two years following the sentinel fracture and subsequently declining with time. This early phase of particularly high risk is termed 'imminent risk'.

Currently, the widely used Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) algorithm accounts for prior fracture, but not for the recency of the prior fracture in its calculation of individualised 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fracture.

Now, an important new study by Kanis et al provides probability ratios that can be used to adjust conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability by accounting for the site of a recent fracture.

The study used data from the Reykjavik Study fracture register that documented prospectively all fractures at all skeletal sites in a large sample of the population of Iceland. The authors determined fracture probabilities after a fracture (humeral, clinical vertebral, forearm and hip fracture) from the hazards of death and fracture. Fracture probabilities were computed for sentinel fractures occurring within the previous two years and for prior osteoporotic fractures irrespective of recency.

Professor John A. Kanis, first author and director of the Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases at Sheffield University, stated:

"The probability ratios derived from this study will facilitate the more accurate categorization of risk in individuals who have sustained a recent fracture. It is important that we are able to identify individuals who are at very high risk so that appropriate treatment to prevent recurrent fractures can be initiated as early as possible."

Study findings include:

  • Probability ratios to adjust 10-year FRAX probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture for recent sentinel fractures were age dependent, decreasing with age in both men and women;
  • Probability ratios varied according to the site of sentinel fracture, with higher ratios for hip and vertebral fracture than for humerus or forearm fracture;
  • Probability ratios to adjust 10-year FRAX probabilities of a hip fracture for recent sentinel fractures were also age dependent, decreasing with age in both men and women, with the exception of forearm fractures.

Professor Cyrus Cooper, President of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and Professor of Musculoskeletal Science and Director of the MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Universities of Southampton and Oxford, UK, added:

"There is a strong rationale for very early intervention immediately after a first fracture to avoid recurrent , which place such a heavy burden on individuals and society as a whole. The possibility to adjust FRAX estimates for recency of fracture is therefore a significant development at many levels. For the physician it provides a new way to categorize a patient's risk, and to identify patients who may benefit from treatment with anabolic first regimens. Additionally, the probability adjustments will impact on FRAX-based guidance and be useful in health economic models that incorporate imminent risk."

It is anticipated that the results of this study will soon be applied to conventional FRAX estimates with appropriate programs on a web-based platform.


Explore further

FRAX score underestimates risk for fracture in multiple sclerosis

More information: J. A. Kanis et al, Adjusting conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability according to the recency of sentinel fractures, Osteoporosis International (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05517-7
Journal information: Osteoporosis International

Citation: Adjusting FRAX estimates to account for site of recent fracture (2020, July 28) retrieved 4 August 2020 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-adjusting-frax-account-site-fracture.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments