Medical masks best, cotton good, bandanas worse: droplet study

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Health experts have determined that face coverings are a vital tool in reducing the spread of coronavirus—but little research has been done into how different kinds of masks compare.

A new study has ranked 14 types of commonly available mask, finding that medical offer significantly more protection against droplet spread than cotton alternatives—while bandanas and balaclavas don't do much at all.

The findings have public policy implications, particularly in the United States where authorities have encouraged the public to use textile masks and leave the medical products to because they are in short supply.

"We need to scale up surgical mask production and distribution," tweeted Tom Frieden, the former director of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention under President Barack Obama, in response to the study that appeared in Science Advances.

Masks are important because some 30-40 percent of people who are infected may not show symptoms but still unwittingly spread the virus when they cough, sneeze or just talk.

A team of scientists at Duke University created an inexpensive setup: people stood in a dark room and spoke the words "Stay healthy, people" five times into the direction of an expanded laser beam, which was recorded with a cell phone camera.

A computer algorithm was then used to calculate the number of droplets. The laser and lens involved can be bought for $200 and the is easy to replicate by non-experts.

"This sort of test could easily be conducted by businesses and others that are providing masks to their employees or patrons," said co-author Martin Fischer, a chemist and physicist.

Professionally-fitted N95 masks—hospital-grade protection worn by frontline workers in hospitals—reduced droplet transmission to less than 0.1 percent.

Surgical or polypropylene masks were not far behind, bringing droplet transmission down by 90 percent or more compared to no face-coverings.

Hand-made cotton face coverings provided good coverage, eliminating 70 to 90 percent of the spray from normal speech, depending on the number of layers and the pleating.

But bandanas only reduced the droplets by about 50 percent and neck fleeces actually increased the amount of spray, probably by dispersing the largest droplets into many smaller droplets.

Finally, N-95 masks with valves—designed for industrial settings where the user's exhalation was less important than what they inhaled—performed roughly on par with cotton masks in terms of the amount of spray transmitted.

Health authorities have discouraged the use of valved N-95s.

Co-author Eric Westman said he had already put the information to use, avoiding the bulk purchase of a type of mask he and a local non-profit had planned to distribute for free to the public of Durham, North Carolina where the university is based.

"The notion that 'anything is better than nothing' didn't hold true," he said.

More information: Low-cost measurement of facemask efficacy for filtering expelled droplets during speech, Science Advances  07 Aug 2020: eabd3083 , DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd3083 , … /sciadv.abd3083.full

Journal information: Science Advances

© 2020 AFP

Citation: Medical masks best, cotton good, bandanas worse: droplet study (2020, August 11) retrieved 29 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Inexpensive, accessible device provides visual proof that masks block droplets


Feedback to editors