Live attenuated vaccines offer more protection against influenza than inactivated vaccines

Why live attenuated vaccines offer more protection against influenza than inactivated vaccines
Figure 1: A colored transmission electron micrograph of influenza viruses (light brown) budding from a host cell. RIKEN researchers have discovered why live attenuated vaccines are more effective at priming the immune system against influenza viruses than inactivated vaccines. Credit: Steve Gschmeissner/Science Photo Library

In a finding that should help researchers develop vaccines that offer broad protection against viruses, a mouse study by RIKEN immunologists has shed light on why people vaccinated with an inactivated form of the influenza virus still sometimes contract the disease.

Influenza is a major global health burden, with the World Health Organization estimating that it causes one billion cases annually. Each year, vaccines are developed that offer some protection against infection. But the influenza virus is a moving target that is constantly mutating, and so vaccines can lose their effectiveness as a season progresses.

There are two common kinds of vaccines: inactivated vaccines (including component vaccines) and live attenuated vaccines. Live vaccines offer broader protection against variants than inactivated vaccines, but they are also more likely to give rise to side effects such as fevers and headaches and as a result they have yet to be approved in some countries such as Japan. Live vaccines induce the production of broadly reactive antibodies, but until now, scientists didn't know why.

Now, in a study on mice, Masato Kubo of the RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences and his co-workers have discovered two processes that live vaccines induce in mice that together account for their broader protection.

They found that, like the virus itself, the live virus causes the virus to replicate deep in the lungs, which in turn induces a structural change in the virus hemagglutinin—a mushroom-shaped protein on the surface of the that plays a major role in infecting . This structural change exposes regions of antigens that are recognizable by the immune system but are usually hidden from it. This is the first process.

The second process is the activation of germinal cells by interleukin 4 (IL-4), a cytokine that plays a major role in regulating antibody production. IL-4 is derived from special T cells known as follicular helper T cells. This activation causes a minor population of B cells to proliferate and it is these B cells that are responsible for generating broadly protective antibodies.

The role of IL-4 in inducing the broad immune response came as a surprise. "Until now there had been no direct evidence to show the importance of IL-4," says Kubo. "That was one of the surprises of this study for me."

"We believe both processes are needed for generating broadly active antibodies: viral duplication in the lungs and expansion of the minor population of B cells," says Kubo. "These two processes mostly likely occur when a person is infected by the itself."

The team now plans to investigate if a similar mechanism operates for other viral infections, including COVID-19.

Explore further

Q And A: How different types of COVID-19 vaccines work

More information: Kosuke Miyauchi et al, Influenza virus infection expands the breadth of antibody responses through IL-4 signalling in B cells, Nature Communications (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24090-z

Masato Kubo et al, Breadth of Antibody Responses during Influenza Virus Infection and Vaccination, Trends in Immunology (2020). DOI: 10.1016/

Journal information: Nature Communications

Provided by RIKEN
Citation: Live attenuated vaccines offer more protection against influenza than inactivated vaccines (2021, September 16) retrieved 18 January 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors