This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Genetic clues could predict leukemia patients' risk of treatment failure

Genetic clues could predict leukemia patients' risk of treatment failure
Treatment of T-ALL IF. (A) Swimmer plot displaying postinduction treatment of patients with IF split by trial. Standard chemotherapy indicates standard trial treatment. Nelarabine indicates nelarabine given either alone or in combination with other agents. High-dose chemotherapy indicates other non–nelarabine-containing regimens, most commonly FLA-IDA. (B) Kaplan-Meier plot showing OS of patients treated with nelarabine versus those not treated with nelarabine. (C) Kaplan-Meier plot showing OS of patients who received SCT versus those who did not. The SCT group included 33 patients (one excluded as underwent SCT when not in remission). The no SCT group included all 31 patients who remitted and were alive and in remission on day 91 (the date of the earliest SCT). (D) Kaplan-Meier plot showing OS of patients with end-of-consolidation MRD more than 1% versus MRD < 1%. CR, complete remission; FLA-IDA, fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin chemotherapy; HSCT, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation; IF, induction failure; MRD, minimal residual disease; OS, overall survival; SCT, stem-cell transplant; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Credit: Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023). DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02734

New research led by UCL and Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) to predict which childhood leukemia patients are at higher risk of not responding well to chemotherapy could allow clinicians to refine treatment strategies to give the best chance of success.

The study, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, combined U.K. trial data from 2003–2019 to see which patients had worse outcomes. They then used whole genome sequencing to look for that could be used to predict this risk in future patients.

The team hope that these genetic clues can be used to identify high-risk patients early, who may be eligible to take part in trials for the latest immunotherapies, such as CAR-T cell therapy.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the main type of childhood leukemia and is split into two subtypes, B-Cell ALL (B-ALL) and T-Cell ALL (T-ALL). The current conventional therapies for ALL include induction chemotherapy and bone marrow transplant. But patients are three times more likely to not respond well to therapy and suffer poor outcomes in T-ALL compared with B-ALL, and there are fewer treatment options available when patients relapse.

This may be about to change, with trials underway for highly promising immunotherapies such as CAR-T cell therapy. This technique was recently used by scientists at UCL and GOSH to treat a patient's "incurable" T-ALL leukemia after conventional treatments had failed. Though the trial continues, the patient is still cancer free almost a year after starting treatment.

In the new study, the team analyzed data from two that involved ALL patients treated in the U.K. between 2003 and 2019, to see what happened to the patients and identify the risk factors associated with conventional treatment failure.

Frozen cells from these trial patients were then whole genome sequenced in order to look for genetic markers associated with poor outcomes, and which might be used to predict the risk of conventional treatment failure in future patients.

The researchers found that one in five , in this case teenagers and , experienced poor outcomes compared to just one in ten younger patients.

Though the genetic profile of the cancers they studied was complex, with individual cancers often very different from one another, the researchers found that mutations in the TAL1, MYC and RAS molecular pathways could be used to quantify a patient's risk of treatment failure.

Dr. David O'Connor (UCL Cancer Institute and Great Ormond Street Hospital) said, "Genetic stratification, where you analyze a patient's genome to assess their risk of certain outcomes, has been successfully used to improve B-ALL treatment. But until now we haven't had the data to do this for T-ALL. Our results could identify a group of who are less likely to respond well to chemotherapy. All childhood leukemia patients in the U.K. undergo sequencing when they are diagnosed, so the should already be available to do this."

Genetic stratification of patients to identify those who are less likely to respond well to conventional treatments would mean that they could be considered for alternatives, such as the CAR-T cell therapies that are now available in clinical trials.

Professor Marc Mansour (UCL Cancer Institute and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health) said, "Around 10% of pediatric T-ALL patients do not respond to initial chemotherapy and the chance of relapse is twice as high as in B-ALL. This is compounded by the fact that there are fewer treatment options for relapsed T-ALL patients. So in T-ALL it's even more important to provide the treatment that will give the highest chances of remission. The that we've identified in this study will allow us to provide the best treatment strategy."

More information: David O'Connor et al, The Clinicogenomic Landscape of Induction Failure in Childhood and Young Adult T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Journal of Clinical Oncology (2023). DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02734

Journal information: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Citation: Genetic clues could predict leukemia patients' risk of treatment failure (2023, May 5) retrieved 25 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-05-genetic-clues-leukemia-patients-treatment.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Improving treatment for hairy cell leukemia

6 shares

Feedback to editors