This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

proofread

Study shows effectiveness of updated COVID-19 vaccines wanes moderately over time, is lower against current variants

Study shows effectiveness of updated COVID-19 vaccines wanes moderately over time, is lower against current variants
Effectiveness of the XBB.1.5 vaccines against omicron subvariants as a function of time since vaccination. Credit: New England Journal of Medicine (2024). DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2402779

Boosters that target the omicron subvariants of SARS-CoV-2 are still providing reasonably durable protection against infection, hospitalization and death from COVID-19, according to new data from a study led by researchers at the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health.

Published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the study found that COVID-19 boosters targeting the XBB.1.5 subvariants were most effective one month after receiving one. After four weeks, the vaccines were 52.2% effective at preventing and 66.8% effective at preventing hospitalization.

The vaccines were also highly effective at preventing death, but exact certainty was hard to quantify given the small number of deaths reported during the study period.

After peaking at four weeks, booster effectiveness waned over time. Effectiveness at preventing infection decreased to 32.6% after 10 weeks and 20.4% after 20 weeks, while effectiveness at preventing hospitalization decreased to 57.1% after 10 weeks.

Danyu Lin, Ph.D., Dennis Gillings Distinguished Professor in the Department of Biostatistics at the Gillings School, is lead author on the study. Using data from the Nebraska Electronic Disease Surveillance System and the Nebraska State Immunization Information System, the research team studied the efficacy of vaccination before and after Oct. 25, 2023, when the JN.1 variant began to emerge.

Vaccine effectiveness was lower in the second group, suggesting that the was less protective against the now-dominant JN.1 strain.

"The JN.1 subvariant has been the dominant strain in the United States this year," said Lin. "The relatively low effectiveness of the XBB.1.5 vaccines against the JN.1 subvariant, together with the waning effectiveness over time, underscores the need for new vaccines targeting the JN.1 strain."

Lin says the Food and Drug Administration's general strategy is to deploy new COVID-19 vaccines annually in the fall that target the circulating strains in the spring, and that the findings in this study may contribute to this decision.

"It would be worthwhile to deploy new vaccines this fall that target the JN.1. strain," he said.

More information: Dan-Yu Lin et al, Durability of XBB.1.5 Vaccines against Omicron Subvariants, New England Journal of Medicine (2024). DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2402779

Journal information: New England Journal of Medicine
Provided by UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health
Citation: Study shows effectiveness of updated COVID-19 vaccines wanes moderately over time, is lower against current variants (2024, May 30) retrieved 12 June 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-05-effectiveness-covid-vaccines-wanes-moderately.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Durability of bivalent boosters against omicron subvariants

0 shares

Feedback to editors