This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication


Understanding the role gut microbiome–brain interactions play in social decision-making

Sensitivity to fairness and the gut microbiome
(A) Study flow and randomization. (B) Sample trial of an unfair offer in the ultimatum game. (C) Distribution of rejection rates of all offers for each group and each session. (D) Change in rejection rates of unfair offers across sessions for each group (to improve visibility, points are jittered). Credit: Plassmann et al

Taking pro- and prebiotics could make people more sensitive to fairness, even at the cost of earning less money, according to a study published in the journal PNAS Nexus.

The role of the human in shaping is only beginning to be explored. Hilke Plassmann and colleagues tested whether taking pro- and prebiotics could affect levels of altruistic punishment.

Fifty-one participants took a supplement containing Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium for seven weeks. Fifty additional participants acted as controls and took placebos.

Before and after the seven-week intake of the dietary supplement, participants were asked to play the "," in which one player controls a pot of money and can offer a share or "split" to a second player. The second player can accept the offer and take the money or can reject the offer—in which case neither player receives any money. Rejecting an unfair offer is interpreted as "altruistic punishment," as the rejecter sacrifices whatever small share is on offer to punish the first player for being ungenerous.

Players who had taken the dietary supplements were more likely to reject offers. In particular, players who had taken the were more likely to reject 30%–40% splits. (All players tended to reject very unequal splits.)

Players who had a high ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes at the beginning of the study saw the greatest changes in both gut makeup and rates of altruistic punishment. The supplements reduced plasma levels of the dopamine precursor tyrosine in some participants, and players who experienced this reduction were the group who saw the most significant increase in altruistic .

According to the authors, people who changed their gut microbiome to a state regarded as healthier became less rational and more sensitive to social considerations.

More information: Marie Falkenstein et al, Impact of the gut microbiome composition on social decision-making, PNAS Nexus (2024). DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae166

Journal information: PNAS Nexus
Provided by PNAS Nexus
Citation: Understanding the role gut microbiome–brain interactions play in social decision-making (2024, May 15) retrieved 20 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Study: People expect others to mirror their own selfishness, generosity


Feedback to editors