Nonadherent MRIs up subsequent medical costs

August 14, 2014
Nonadherent MRIs up subsequent medical costs

(HealthDay)—Nonadherent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization is tied to a cascade of higher medical costs and potentially unnecessary and unhelpful medical services following the MRI, according to research published in the Aug. 1 issue of Spine.

Barbara S. Webster, from the Liberty Mutual Research Institute for
Safety in Hopkinton, Mass., and colleagues used data from a longitudinal workers' compensation administrative data source to identify low back claims filed in 2006. Health care utilization was evaluated by classification of MRI timing (early, timely, or no MRI) and by severity (more or less severe) at three, six, nine, and 12 months post-MRI.

The researchers found that adjusted relative risks for receipt of electromyography, nerve conduction testing, advanced imaging, injections, and surgery within six months post-MRI ranged from 6.5- to 54.9-times the rate for the reference group (no MRI, less severe). The adjusted relative risks to receive most services were similar for the timely and early MRI less severe subgroups. The adjusted relative risks were higher for the early MRI more severe subgroup than timely MRI more severe subgroup cases. Both early MRI subgroups had the highest , and these costs increased the most over time.

"Study results provide evidence to promote provider and patient conversations to help patients choose care that is based on evidence, free from harm, less costly, and truly necessary," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to insurance companies, including Liberty Mutual, which sponsored the study.

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Related Stories

Magnetic resonance imaging with side effects

April 30, 2012

Great care should be taken when performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a cardiac pacemaker. Henning Bovenschulte and his co-authors review recent findings in the latest issue of Deutsches Ärzteblatt ...

Low back pain outcomes not improved by early imaging

August 22, 2012

(HealthDay) -- For workers with low back pain, early magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not associated with better health outcomes at one year, according to a study published in the Aug. 15 issue of Spine.

Surgery consultation common after MRI of the spine

January 2, 2013

(HealthDay)—Almost half of patients whose primary care physicians recommend a lumbosacral or cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan go on to receive a surgical consultation, but few end up undergoing spinal ...

Self-referral spurs unnecessary MRI exams for patients

September 17, 2013

Patients having knee MRI examinations are significantly more likely to receive a negative finding if referred by physicians who have a financial interest in the imaging equipment being used, according to a study published ...

Pre-op MRI of margins predicts rectal cancer outcomes

December 8, 2013

(HealthDay)—Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of circumferential resection margin (CRM) status predicts survival and other disease progression outcomes in patients with rectal cancer, ...

Recommended for you

Can four fish oil pills a day keep the doctor away?

July 7, 2015

Fish oil is one of the most popular dietary supplements in the U.S. because of the perceived cardiovascular benefits of the omega-3 it contains. However, scientific findings on its effectiveness have been conflicting. New ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jim4321
not rated yet Aug 14, 2014
The over all tone of this article is that money is being wasted by doctors that do not adhere to the guidelines for imaging -- since in these cases more money is spent in follow up care. Just the opposite can be argued. Namely, guidelines are guidelines. They are not a rote prescription for how to treat a patient. When doctors ignore guidelines, its often because its clear that the injury in a particular case is both acute and severe and in need of immediate treatment. Since doctors are selecting out the most severe cases for immediate imaging, its not surprising that more extensive care is needed later. Basically, the article is special pleading for the insurance industry -- as indicated by the fact that several of the authors are affiliated with that industry.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.