February 15, 2013

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

British-Chinese adoption study

× close

Research by Professor Alan Rushton, King's College London and the British Association for Adoption & Fostering (BAAF) gives new insight into the long-term effects and outcomes for children adopted from abroad.

During the 1960s, just over a hundred girls were sent to the UK via the International Social Services UK Hong Kong Project and placed for adoption. Funded by the Nuffield Foundation, the study reports how 72 women have fared in life.

The key findings of the study were:


Professor Alan Rushton, King's College London's Institute of Psychiatry and co-author of the study says: "We have increasing amounts of information about the childhood and adolescent outcomes of orphanage care but are still in the dark about the longer-term consequences. This study is perhaps a unique example of testing the links between early deprivation, international adoption and outcomes in midlife. Contrary to expectations, the psychological outcomes were found to be commensurate with matched groups of adopted and non-adopted women born in the UK. Such findings need to be taken into account in theories of lifespan development."

Julia Feast, from BAAF and co-author of the project says: "This study clearly identifies the adaptability, resilience and strength of human beings when faced with significant early adversity. It attests to the importance of family life in providing nurture, care, stimulation and opportunity even when children have had a poor start in life.

"Whilst the findings are in the main very positive.... the challenges and complexities of inter-country adoption should not be underestimated."

The women were mostly abandoned as infants (and left to be found) and spent between 8 and 72 months in one of 4 orphanages in Hong Kong. Whilst they appear to have experienced a reasonable quality of physical and medical care and nutrition in comparison to the globally depriving environments reported in other adoption studies, they lacked the consistent one-to-one care and stimulation that infants typically need for their proper development.

There have been longstanding questions about how the extent to which early adversity in childhood, especially lack of individualised psycho-social care, creates problems developmentally and also how it effects the life choices people take in later life. This unique study gives a rare opportunity to explore the impact of adverse early experience, modified by adoption in creating both opportunities and risks through both child and adulthood over 50 years.

The report presents the main findings of the study, combining an in-depth analysis of some of the key outcome findings with a qualitative analysis of face-to-face interviews with the women. These interviews provide evocative and compelling stories of different aspects of their lives. The use of standardised measures has also enabled important comparisons to be made with other studies, particularly the National Childhood Study of 1958. These comparisons are particularly important in the understanding of how these women's experiences are similar to or different from those of other adopted and non-adopted raised in the UK.

More information: A summary of the findings is available here.

Load comments (0)