December 20, 2023

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
reputable news agency
proofread

Assisted reproductive technology not tied to higher BMI in childhood, finds study

Credit: CC0 Public Domain
× close
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Being born after assisted reproductive technology (ART) is not associated with higher body mass index (BMI) at age 5 to 8 years, according to a study published online Dec. 19 in PLOS Medicine.

Kristina Laugesen, M.D., Ph.D., from Aarhus University in Denmark, and colleagues examined associations between different fertility treatments and BMI in children at age 5 to 8 years. The analysis included 327,301 Danish children born between 2007 and 2012 (13,675 born after ART and 7,728 born after ovulation induction with or without [OI/IUI]).

The researchers found that the crude prevalence of obesity was 1.9% in children born after ART, 2.0% in those born after OI/IUI, and 2.7% in those born after no fertility treatment. Children born after ART and OI/IUI had the same prevalence of being overweight (11%; prevalence odds ratio [POR], 1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91 to 1.11]; P = 0.95) or obese (1.9%; POR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.29]; P = 0.94) in adjusted analyses.

A similar pattern was seen when comparing with conventional in vitro fertilization (overweight: POR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.07]; P = 0.39; obesity: POR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.61]; P = 0.36). After frozen-thawed (2.7%) , obesity was more prevalent than after fresh embryo transfer (1.8%; POR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.09 to 2.17]; P = 0.01).

"Our overall null results provide reassuring results for couples with infertility seeking help," the authors write.

More information: Kristina Laugesen et al, Overweight or obesity in children born after assisted reproductive technologies in Denmark: A population-based cohort study, PLOS Medicine (2023). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004324

Journal information: PLoS Medicine

Load comments (0)