December 3, 2019

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

Sleep helps memory, right? Not for eyewitnesses

Credit: CC0 Public Domain
× close
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

New research investigating the effect of sleep on eyewitness memory has found that having a period of sleep, compared to a period of wake, does not improve eyewitness identification accuracy.

The research team, led by Ph.D. student, David Morgan at Royal Holloway, University of London, Professor Laura Mickes, senior author at the University of Bristol and including researchers from Royal Holloway, the Universities of California, USA and Birmingham, and funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is published today [4 December] in Royal Society Open Science.

Sleep has long thought to be involved in strengthening memories. Yet there is very little research on whether this is the case for eyewitness , such as when an eyewitness is asked to try to pick the perpetrator out of a line-up that includes the (who is either guilty or innocent) and other known-to-be innocent people.

The researchers conducted a large-scale online experiment on 4,000 participants to measure the impact of sleep on eyewitness identification accuracy on experimental eyewitnesses.

In the experiment, 2,000 participants watched a video of a mock crime, either slept (overnight) or remained awake (during the day) and were then tested on their memory for the perpetrator in the video on a line-up.

The research team also collected data from 2,000 control participants as a control for time of day confounds. Unlike the experimental participants who had 12 hours between the video and the line-up test, these participants were tested right after watching the video. While their ability to distinguish between innocent and guilty suspects was better than the participants in the experimental groups, the groups were just as reliable. That is, regardless if memory was tested 12 hours after first exposure, if a suspect was identified with high confidence, they were highly accurate.

Professor Laura Mickes in the School of Psychological Science, senior and corresponding author of the study, said: "Based on prior work that sleep improves memory, we predicted that it would in this case too. It did not. There was no difference in memory performance between the sleep and wake groups.

"There are two major implications from our research: sleep does not benefit eyewitness identification, nor does it impact reliability. The fact that reliability is not impacted by various factors—sleep vs. wake; short vs. long retention intervals—is in line with a growing body of evidence that eyewitness reliability holds across a host of factors.

"Our research suggests police should collect expressions of confidence in the initial identification because these are predictive of accuracy regardless if there was a delay between witnessing the event or not or if sleep took place. Additionally, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) should make use of this information in legal proceedings."

Three important findings from the research include:

The next steps for the researchers are to conduct large-scale replication of basic memory experiments that have shown a sleep benefit.

More information: The Impact of Sleep on Eyewitness Identifications, Royal Society Open Science, royalsocietypublishing.org/doi … /10.1098/rsos.170501

Journal information: Royal Society Open Science

Load comments (0)