May 1, 2023

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread

Expert calls for reforms to address the overdose crisis

Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain
× close
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

At the end of 2022, the federal government eliminated the "X waiver," a major hurdle to providing addiction treatment, but progress needs to be continued, according to the authors of a new Perspective piece published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The X waiver required a special license and uncompensated training for physicians and other prescribers, creating a regulatory barrier to offering lifesaving buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. Ending the X, the authors write, is necessary but not sufficient to achieve overdose-prevention goals.

Sarah Wakeman, MD, Medical Director for Substance Use Disorder at Mass General Brigham, and her co-author Leo Beletsky, JD, MPH, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, call for several additional measures to expand access. These include:

"The X waiver was one example of an onerous and unnecessary barrier to a lifesaving intervention, but there are many others, including methadone regulations and policies obstructing access to harm-reduction services," said Wakeman. "We believe the should continue its important progress in expanding access to medication for by rethinking methadone regulations."

More information: Sarah E. Wakeman et al, Beyond the X—Next Steps in Policy Reforms to Address the Overdose Crisis, New England Journal of Medicine (2023). DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2301479

Journal information: New England Journal of Medicine

Load comments (0)