July 13, 2022

New study updates evidence on rare heart condition after COVID vaccination

Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

A study published by The BMJ today provides an up-to-date summary of evidence on the risk of heart inflammation (myocarditis and pericarditis) after mRNA vaccination against the COVID-19 virus.

The review of more than 8,000 reported cases from 46 studies by researchers in Canada confirms previous reports that myocarditis is rare, but cases are highest among young males shortly after a second dose, and are probably higher after Moderna's mRNA vaccine than after Pfizer's vaccine.

It also shows that while cases are predominantly mild, the risk of myocarditis or pericarditis might be lower when the second dose is given more than 30 days after the first dose.

However, the researchers warn that in general, the evidence is of low certainty and say these findings must be considered alongside the overall benefits of vaccination.

Myocarditis (inflammation of the ) and pericarditis ( of the fluid-filled sac surrounding the heart) are rare but serious conditions, usually triggered by a viral infection. Reports of these conditions after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination have prompted ongoing surveillance and research.

The results show that rates of myocarditis after mRNA vaccines were highest in male adolescents and young male adults (50-139 cases per million in 12-17 year-olds and 28-147 cases per million in 18-29 year-olds).

For girls and boys aged 5-11 years and females aged 18-29 years, rates of myocarditis after vaccination with Pfizer might be fewer than 20 cases per million.

For individuals aged 18-29 years, myocarditis is probably higher after vaccination with Moderna than with Pfizer, and for 12-39 year-olds, myocarditis or pericarditis might be lower when the second dose is given more than 30 days after the first dose.

Data specific to males aged 18-29 years indicates that the dosing interval might need to increase to more than 56 days to substantially drop rates of these conditions.

As such, the researchers say giving Pfizer over Moderna and extending dosing intervals might be beneficial for younger people.

But they point out that the clinical course of myocarditis in children 5-11 years, after a third dose, and for those with previous myocarditis after mRNA vaccination is largely unknown. And although the short term course has consistently shown to be quite mild and self-limiting, they say more data for longer term prognosis is needed.

They also acknowledge some limitations of their review, including the rapidly evolving COVID-19 literature base and the potential for misdiagnosis. However, their comprehensive, peer-reviewed search strategy and use of a range of information sources enabled them to capture the latest data.

As such they conclude, "As the COVID-19 pandemic enters its third year, continued surveillance of myocarditis after mRNA vaccines, especially in younger ages, after dose three (and subsequent doses) and in previous cases is needed to support continued decision making for COVID-19 boosters."

And they call for additional monitoring of people with relevant underlying conditions, long term follow-up of patients with myocarditis, and further studies to "enhance understanding of the mechanism or mechanisms of myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination."

This large body of reviewed studies continues to suggest that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a rare but heightened risk of acute myocarditis and pericarditis, say U.S. researchers in a linked editorial.

They point out that key uncertainties remain, including risks associated with boosters, risks associated with primary vaccination of young children, and the long-term outcomes of those who experience .

"But these uncertainties must be placed in the context of the substantial and widely accepted benefits of vaccination," they conclude.

More information: Incidence, risk factors, natural history, and hypothesised mechanisms of myocarditis and pericarditis following covid-19 vaccination: living evidence syntheses and review, The BMJ (2022). DOI: 10.1136/bmj‑2021-069445

Journal information: British Medical Journal (BMJ)

Load comments (0)