AIDS: New evidence backs circumcision campaign

July 20, 2011 by Richard Ingham in HIV & AIDS

A campaign to encourage African men to get circumcised to prevent infection by HIV gained a powerful boost Wednesday by three new studies unveiled at the world AIDS forum in Rome.

New cases of HIV among fell by an astonishing 76 percent after a circumcision programme was launched in a South African township, researchers reported.

Had no circumcisions been carried out, the tally of new infections among the overall population, men and women combined, would have been 58 percent higher.

"This study is a fantastic result for a simple intervention which costs 40 euros (56 dollars), takes 20 minutes and has to be done only once in a lifetime," said David Lewis, of the Society for in Johannesburg and the University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.

In 2006, trials in Kenya, Uganda and South Africa found foreskin removal more than halved men's risk of infection by the (HIV).

Longer-term analysis found the benefit to be even greater than thought, with a risk reduction of around 60 percent.

After pondering risks and benefits, health watchdogs set in motion circumcision campaigns in 13 sub-Saharan countries that have been badly hit by the .

Advocates call it "surgical vaccine", describing it as a cheap yet effective form of prevention.

Sub-Saharan Africa is home to two-thirds of the 33 million people living with HIV. As of mid-2010, around 175,000 circumcisions had been carried out in the 13 countries considered priorities, according to UNAIDS.

The new study was conducted between 2007 and 2010 in Orange Farm, a township of 110,000 adults, where more than 20,000 circumcisons had been performed, especially in the 15-24 age group which is most sexually active.

Two other studies released in Rome added to the good news about circumcision:

-- say they experience greater after surgery, a finding that should help overcome unease about the operation.

Investigators at the University of Makerere interviewed 316 men, average age 22, who had been circumcised between February and September 2009.

A year after the operation, 220 of the volunteers said they were sexually active, of whom a quarter said they used condoms.

A total of 87.7 percent said they found it easier to reach an orgasm after being circumcised, and 92.3 percent said they experienced more sexual pleasure.

-- Newly-circumcised men are just as likely as uncircumcised men to practice safe sex, according to interviews conducted among 2,207 men in western Kenya, six months after they had had the operation.

This helps ease concerns that circumcised men are tempted to abandon condom use in the belief they are completely shielded from HIV.

France's 2008 Nobel laureate Francoise Barre-Sinoussi, who in 1983 co-identified HIV as the source of AIDS, said over-confidence in circumcision was a major anxiety.

"Nothing provides 100-percent protection, not even a vaccine," she told AFP. "Let's stop thinking that one preventative tool is enough. Circumcision has to be part of a combined approach."

The theory behind the benefits of circumcision is that the inner foreskin is an easy entry point for HIV. It is rich in so-called Langerhans cells, tissue that the AIDS virus easily latches on to and penetrates.

On the downside, male circumcision does not reduce the risk for women who have intercourse with an HIV-infected man, and the protective benefit does not seem to apply to homosexual intercourse.

There is an indirect advantage, though. The fewer men who are infected with HIV, the smaller the risk of infection for others.

"Science is proving that we are at the tipping point of the epidemic," said Michel Sidibe, executive director of UNAIDS.

Scaling up voluntary to young men in places with HIV prevalence will help reach the UN's 2015 goal of halving sexual transmission of the disease, he said.

(c) 2011 AFP

not rated yet  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Sigismond
Jul 21, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Breast ablation too is a weapon against breast cancer.
Sigismond
Jul 21, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
"87.7 percent said they found it easier to reach an orgasm after being circumcised, and 92.3 percent said they experienced more sexual pleasure." A BIG LIE!!!

THIRD BIG LIE: "On the downside, male circumcision does not reduce the risk for women who have intercourse with an HIV-infected man" - Sure, THEY DO NOT TELL that it does strengthen the risk by 55%!!! (Wawer's enquiry)
freethinking
Jul 21, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Something is fishy here. Slight reduction in risk is a possiblity (though I doubt it).
Sigismond
Jul 22, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Preaching both abstinence and the removal of the specific organ for manusexuality is utterly illogical.
Sigismond
Jul 22, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The 55% higher risk for women can be calculated from Dr Wawer enquiry: Wawer M., Makumbi F., Kigozi G., Serwadda D., Watya S., Nalugoda F. and others. Circumcision in HIV-infected men and its effect on HIV transmission to female partners in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009 (374-9685) : 229-237.

Indeed, the enquiry gives figures of declared infections by the HIV of:

17/92 = 18.48%, for the circumciseds' companions,

and 8/67 = 11.94% for the intacts' companions,

now 18.48 - 11.94 = 6.54, and 6.54/11.94 = 54.77% higher risk.
freethinking
Jul 22, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Sigismond, I'm with you and I'm against circumcising in general. I do however support the parents choice for infants, as there are pro's and conns to circumcision. I myself think the cons outweigh the pros. I don't mind factual information about circumsion, that said, when AIDS gets involved, politics and special interests get involved.

I think there is something wrong with this study, not sure if it is because of poor science, politics, or special interests.

First Big alert was when they said 92.3% experienced more sexual pleasure. Given that there is a large % of men who say the oposite, I think this is very likely the same thing as when a communist dictator wins an election by that margin.

2'nd big alert, such a high protection factor. 76%

I say follow the money. Who is getting the money and for what?
ml66uk
Jul 23, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
From the USAID report "LEVELS AND SPREAD OF HIV SEROPREVALENCE AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS: EVIDENCE FROM NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS"
"There appears no clear pattern of association between male circumcision and HIV prevalencein 8 of 18 countries with data, HIV prevalence is lower among circumcised men, while in the remaining 10 countries it is higher."
http://www.measur...CR22.pdf

The South African National Communication Survey on HIV/AIDS, 2009 found that 15% of adults across age groups "believe that circumcised men do not need to use condoms".
http://www.info.g...2009.htm

The one randomized controlled trial into male-to-female transmission showed a 54% higher rate in the group where the men had been circumcised btw.
http://www.thelan...abstract
Hugh7
Jul 24, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
76% sounds like a lot, but we need to know more about the actual figures. This was just a presentation at a conference, not a published peer-reviewed scientific paper yet.

The same researchers found in the same place in 2001 that customary circumcision showed no protective effect, sugggesting that it is something else that makes the difference.

The circumcised men were younger, more educated, and more aware of their HIV status than those who were not circumcised. That in itself may hold the answer for the lower HIV rate, and nothing to do with circumcision. Being younger, they have had less opportunity to be infected. Being more educated, they may be more careful (as also shown by their greater awareness of their status). They all volunteered for circumcision, so they might be more careful anyway.

We should be very careful about claims that circumcision itself is protective. It has a sorry history of being a "cure" in search of a disease, an act in search of an excuse.
Hugh7
Jul 24, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The study claiming to show that circumcised men enjoy sex more could not be double blinded; both interviewers and subjects knew what the "right" answers were.

All the subjects were volunteers for circumcision; men who valued their foreskins would have stayed away.

Therefore, as objective science, this study (not yet published in a peer-reviewed journal) is not worth a hill of beans.
Rank not rated yet
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Engineered cytomegalovirus protects monkeys from HIV equivalent

(Medical Xpress)—A new study by researchers in the US has shown that an ancient virus can be modified to help in the fight against the simian immunodeficiency virus SIV, which is the equivalent in monkeys ...

HIV & AIDS created May 24, 2013 | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 0 | with audio podcast report

New microsphere-based methods for detecting HIV antibodies

Detection of HIV antibodies is used to diagnose HIV infection and monitor trials of experimental HIV/AIDS vaccines. New, more sensitive detection systems being developed use microspheres to capture HIV antibodies ...

HIV & AIDS created May 23, 2013 | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Fecal microbiota tx feasible for recurrent C. difficile in HIV

(HealthDay)—For HIV-infected individuals with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, fecal microbiota therapy is feasible, according to a letter published in the May 21 issue of the Annals of Intern ...

HIV & AIDS created May 22, 2013 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Canada lifts ban on gay men donating blood

Canadian health authorities lifted Wednesday what was effectively a ban on gay men giving blood, announcing new rules making men who have not had sex with men in the past five years eligible.

HIV & AIDS created May 22, 2013 | popularity not rated yet | comments 1

AIDS scientists optimistic of AIDS cure, for some

Top AIDS scientists were optimistic Wednesday of finding a cure for the disease that has claimed 30 million lives—but said it might not work for all people.

HIV & AIDS created May 22, 2013 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


First drug to improve heart failure mortality in over a decade

Coenzyme Q10 decreases all cause mortality by half, according to the results of a multicentre randomised double blind trial presented today at Heart Failure 2013 congress. It is the first drug to improve heart failure mortality ...

Heart failure accelerates male 'menopause'

Heart failure accelerates the aging process and brings on early andropausal syndrome (AS), according to research presented today at the Heart Failure Congress 2013. AS, also referred to as male 'menopause', was four times ...

Death highest in heart failure patients admitted in January, on Friday, and overnight

Mortality and length of stay are highest in heart failure patients admitted in January, on Friday, and overnight, according to research presented today at the Heart Failure Congress 2013. The analysis of nearly 1 million ...

Feds fight morning-after pill age ruling in NY

(AP)—Department of Justice lawyers have again asked a federal appeals court in New York to delay lifting age restrictions and prescription requirements on an emergency contraceptive popularly known as the morning-after ...

Researchers identify first drug targets in childhood genetic tumor disorder

Two mutations central to the development of infantile myofibromatosis (IM)—a disorder characterized by multiple tumors involving the skin, bone, and soft tissue—may provide new therapeutic targets, according to researchers ...

Driving and hands-free talking lead to spike in errors, study shows

Talking on a hands-free device while behind the wheel can lead to a sharp increase in errors that could imperil other drivers on the road, according to new research from the University of Alberta.