Children born after unplanned pregnancy are slower to develop

July 26, 2011 in Health

Children born after unplanned pregnancies tend to have a more limited vocabulary and poorer non-verbal and spatial abilities; however this is almost entirely explained by their disadvantaged circumstances, according to a new study published in the British Medical Journal today. The same study reported no adverse effects of infertility treatment on the children.

In the UK, as many as 30-40% of pregnancies that end in childbirth are unplanned, while the number of children born after assisted reproductive technologies is growing every year.

It is already known that children born after a prolonged time to conception or are at greater risk of poor , such as preterm birth, , and congenital anomalies, and some researchers have reported lower cognitive (mental) scores in such children.

Unplanned pregnancies also have poorer outcomes, but there has been little research to assess whether child development is associated with pregnancy planning.

So a team of UK researchers set out to investigate how pregnancy planning, time to conception, and infertility treatment influence a child's cognitive development at three and five years old.

They analysed data from approximately 12,000 children from the Millennium Cohort Study, a large UK study of families and infants born in 2000-2. Parents who took part were interviewed when their child was nine months old and then revisited when the child was three and five years old.

Mothers reported whether the pregnancy was planned, their feelings when first pregnant, time to conception, and details of any .

Each child's verbal, non-verbal and spatial abilities were tested at age three and five using the British Ability Scales.

Initial analyses showed that children born after an were four to five months behind planned children in verbal abilities, while children born after assisted reproduction were three to four months ahead.

However, these differences all but disappeared when the researchers took into account the socioeconomic circumstances of each child.

The authors conclude: "These differences are almost entirely explained by socioeconomic factors, providing further evidence of the influence of socioeconomic inequalities on the lives of children in the UK. To help children achieve their full potential, policy makers should continue to target social inequalities."

Provided by British Medical Journal search and more info website

5 /5 (2 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Bonkers
Jul 27, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
But, hang on, socio-economic status is also fairly strongly correlated with parental primary intelligence, and with what they then get from their education. Is there not a recursion here? i.e. its not riches that produce brains, but brains that produce riches that produce brains.
Bonkers
Jul 27, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
This is dangerous territory of course, but i would be cautious of "throwing money" at the problem, hoping that increased socio-economic status will be a wonder-cure. Here in Britain the champions of the S-E disadvantaged looked longingly at the apparent advantages of a university education, but graduates did well because they were already the top 5-10% of their generation. Suddenly opening universities to 50% of the population didn't put those 50% into the top 5-10%, of course it didn't. Actually it has made the government finance model - which worked when it subsidised only 5% of the population, untenable. Now we have university affordable only by the very rich or the very poor.
Shelgeyr
Jul 27, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Children born after unplanned pregnancies tend to have a more limited vocabulary and poorer non-verbal and spatial abilities; however this is almost entirely explained by their disadvantaged circumstances...


I find it somewhat odd that they don't include children who were unplanned but given up for adoption. I'm willing to bet they don't fit this pattern, precisely because they aren't being (or haven't been) raised in "disadvantaged circumstances".

It is always pointless to generalize from a very small number of examples, but I'm going to anyways because the two children I know of who were both (A) unplanned, and (B) adopted, are actually ahead of the game and have been developing abilities and skills a bit earlier than normal. I'm pretty sure this also holds true for the adults I know who were adopted as children.
bottomlesssoul
Jul 27, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The researchers looked at this backwards. Children whose parents plan and anticipate their future might be healthier than children whose parents 'wing it'.
Rank 5 /5 (2 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

In Spain, 70 percent of women use contraceptives during their first sexual encounter

Contraceptive use in Spain during the first sexual encounter is similar to other European countries. However, there are some geographical differences between Spanish regions: women in Murcia use contraceptives ...

Health created 35 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

WHO target to cut early chronic illness deaths

The World Health Organization announced on Friday it was set to approve a new target to reduce premature deaths from chronic illnesses such as heart disease by a quarter by 2025.

Health created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Better response plans needed for children exposed to domestic violence

(Medical Xpress) -- Each year, millions of children are exposed to domestic violence, a traumatic experience that has been associated with cognitive, behavioral, social and emotional problems in childhood ...

Health created 3 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Australia defiant on WTO cigarette challenge

Australia said Friday it would "vigorously defend" itself against complaints about its plan for plain cigarette packaging made by Honduras and Ukraine to the World Trade Organisation.

Health created 3 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

World 'no tobacco day' puts spotlight on dangers of smoking

It’s not just smokers who are at-risk when it comes to tobacco smoke exposure—and the health concerns of smoking cigarettes are not limited to the most known consequence: lung cancer. 

Health created 5 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


Inherited DNA change explains overactive leukemia gene

A small inherited change in DNA is largely responsible for overactivating a gene linked to poor treatment response in people with acute leukemia.

Cancer may require simpler genetic mutations than previously thought

Chromosomal deletions in DNA often involve just one of two gene copies inherited from either parent. But scientists haven't known how a deletion in one gene from one parent, called a "hemizygous" deletion, can contribute ...

Implantable pain disk may help those with cancer

An estimated 3.5 million cancer patients around the globe are in severe pain from their disease, but many get no relief.

World Health Assembly endorses new plan to increase global access to vaccines

Ministers of Health from 194 countries at the Sixty-fifth World Health Assembly today endorsed a landmark Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP), a roadmap to prevent millions of deaths by 2020 through more equitable access to ...

Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse

(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...

First study to suggest that the immune system may protect against Alzheimer's changes in humans

Recent work in mice suggested that the immune system is involved in removing beta-amyloid, the main Alzheimer's-causing substance in the brain. Researchers have now shown for the first time that this may apply in humans.