Hard fight ahead: Experts hope for rapid progress against Alzheimer's

By Alvin Powell
A Harvard School of Public Health and Alzheimer’s Europe survey was the focus of a forum that included Matthew Baumgart (from left), senior director of government affairs for the Alzheimer's Association, Adrian Ivinson, founding director of the Harvard NeuroDiscovery Center, and Robert Blendon, professor of health policy and political analysis at HSPH. Credit: Aubrey LaMedica/Harvard School of Public Health

Experts on Alzheimer’s disease expressed hope of rapid progress against the condition Friday (July 22) even as they acknowledged that there’s little medical science can do today to help patients.

The panel, which appeared online in a presentation of The Forum at Harvard School of Public Health, also discussed a new Harvard School of Public Health and Alzheimer’s Europe survey showing Alzheimer’s to be the number two health fear — behind cancer — in four countries. The survey, led by Robert Blendon, professor of health policy and political analysis, also showed that the vast majority of respondents would want to know they had the disease even though there is nothing physicians can do to treat it.

Blendon, who appeared at the event with Adrian Ivinson, founding director of the Harvard NeuroDiscovery Center, and Matthew Baumgart, senior director of government affairs for the Alzheimer’s Association, said the survey also showed that most people mistakenly believe that there is a definitive test to determine whether one has the disease and that there are things physicians can do to slow the disease’s course.

In fact, panelists said, there is no single test to definitively identify the disease, especially before symptoms appear, and little doctors can do once a patient is diagnosed with it.

Alzheimer’s disease afflicts more than 5 million people in the United States alone, half of whom are undiagnosed. Getting older is the primary risk factor, with the disease usually beginning after age 60 and affecting the parts of the brain controlling thought, memory, and language. The number of Americans with the disease has doubled since 1980 and could reach 13.5 million by 2050, according the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The survey, released July 20, sampled the knowledge and attitudes of 2,678 people in five countries, the United States, France, Germany, Spain, and Poland. Though it showed that Alzheimer’s was the number two health fear in four countries, respondents in the fifth, Poland, ranked it third, behind cancer and heart disease.

Overall, respondents were acutely aware of the condition. More than 85 percent said they’d see a doctor if they were experiencing memory loss and confusion to determine if the cause was Alzheimer’s. The survey showed the disease’s reach: majorities in all countries know or have known someone with it and three in 10 had family members with the condition.

The survey showed that there is room for additional education, since just 40 percent were aware that Alzheimer’s is fatal.

Panelists discussed the usefulness of early testing, should a test become available. Baumgart said that even without treatment available, it has been shown that earlier diagnosis is helpful for patients, giving them time to get their affairs in order and participate in the decisions about their care. Early diagnosis also lessens stress on caregivers. In addition, Baumgart said, about a fourth of patients with memory problems and cognitive dysfunction don’t have Alzheimer’s, but instead a treatable condition, such as depression or a vitamin deficit.

By 2050, Baumgart said, Alzheimer’s spending in the United States is expected to rise from $183 billion today to $1 trillion, most of which will be paid through government Medicare and Medicaid programs. Given public concern, rising incidence, and growing cost, governments will be under increasing pressure to devote funding to Alzheimer’s research, panelists said.

Ivinson said significant progress has been made in the past decade and several avenues of research are waiting for funding to move ahead. Though recent research has been promising, the public’s expectation of results within five years — as shown by the survey — may be too optimistic, he said.

“There’s real reason for optimism today compared with 10 years ago. There are lots of avenues of inquiry wanting funding,” he said.

As treatments become available, the need for a reliable test that can detect the disease in its early stages will increase, Ivinson said. Alzheimer’s can damage the brain for 10 years before symptoms appear.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Falls may be early sign of Alzheimer's

Jul 18, 2011

Falls and balance problems may be early indicators of Alzheimer’s disease, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis report July 17, 2011, at the Alzheimer’s Association International ...

Recommended for you

UN says Syria vaccine deaths was an NGO 'mistake'

4 hours ago

The recent deaths of Syrian children after receiving measles vaccinations was the result of a "mistake" by a non-governmental partner who mixed in a muscle relaxant meant for anesthesia, a spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general ...

First US child dies from enterovirus D68

5 hours ago

A child in the northeastern US state of Rhode Island has become the first to die from an ongoing outbreak of a respiratory virus, enterovirus D68, health officials said Wednesday.

US Ebola patient had contact with kids: governor

5 hours ago

A man who was diagnosed with Ebola in virus in Texas came in contact with young children, and experts are monitoring them for any signs of disease, governor Rick Perry said Wednesday.

UN worker dies of suspected Ebola in Liberia

5 hours ago

The United Nations mission in Liberia announced on Wednesday the first suspected victim among its employees of the deadly Ebola epidemic ravaging the impoverished west African nation.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

hush1
not rated yet Jul 26, 2011
Get rid of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security first. Those avenues of inquiry want funding. That's a cure that pays for the future cure found. No more patients to cure with those cuts? Preemptive 'medicine'.