Advocates: HIV prevention pill could save lives

By LINDSEY TANNER , AP Medical Writer
In this Thursday, May 10, 2012 photo, Dr. Lisa Sterman holds up a Truvada pill at her office in San Francisco. Sterman prescribes the drug off-label for about a dozen patients at high risk for developing AIDS. The pill, already used to treat people with HIV, also helps prevent the virus from infecting healthy people. The Food and Drug Administration is expected to decide by June 15 whether the pill’s maker Gilead Sciences should be allowed to formally market the drug for preventive use. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

(AP) -- A pill to prevent HIV infection is already being given to some healthy people, but without government approval, it remains out of reach and too costly for many who need it.

Doctors, patients and advocates say that would change if the takes a landmark step and allows the pill, Truvada, to be marketed for prevention. The drug has been used for some time as a treatment for those already infected with the .

"This is a pretty radical step, but I think it's a necessary step," said Dr. Lisa Sterman of San Francisco, who prescribes the drug for already infected patients and those who are healthy but at risk of getting the virus from their partners or through .

"We've come as far as we can with and strategies," Sterman said.

A panel of advisers to the Food and Drug Administration late Thursday endorsed using Truvada as a preventive.

In the 30-year battle against AIDS, "it's the first time we have talked about a medication for prevention of HIV," Sterman said.

Doctors are allowed to prescribe Truvada "off-label" for prevention, but would formally allow the pill's maker Gilead Sciences to market it for that use. It likely would lead many more insurance companies to pay for the costly drug. The FDA usually follows advisers' recommendations and a decision is expected by June 15.

The panel's action "is a huge step forward," said Nick Literski, a federal worker in Seattle who has been taking Truvada for for more than a year. His partner has the AIDS virus. Literski's insurance covers his . The pill's annual cost ranges from just under $11,000 up to $14,000.

Using the drug for prevention "is really allowing people to make educated choices about their health," Literski said.

An estimated 1.2 million Americans have HIV and many more worldwide. AIDS can develop unless the virus is treated with . The success of such medicines has helped make the disease more manageable and allows patients to live much longer than when the epidemic began 30 years ago.

About 50,000 new HIV infections are diagnosed in the U.S. each year - a number that has held steady for about 15 years.

"We're going to have to take some radical steps in order to stop this epidemic," Sterman said.

Truvada is marketed by Gilead Sciences Inc. of Foster City, Calif. Studies have shown daily use is highly effective at preventing HIV infections.

James Loduca, a spokesman for the San Francisco AIDS Foundation, praised the advisory panel's action.

"With this recommendation, we're nearing a watershed moment in our fight against HIV," Loduca said. "We know this isn't a magic bullet, and it's not going to be the right prevention strategy for everyone, but it could save thousands of lives in the United States and potentially millions around the world."

Not everyone in the HIV community is so gung-ho about using Truvada for prevention.

Michael Weinstein, president of AIDS Healthcare Foundation, is among the most vocal opponents. His Los Angeles-based group bills itself as the nation's largest provider of medical care for HIV and AIDS, and Weinstein's main concern is that patients won't take the drug as directed - a pill a day plus the use of condoms. Misuse could create drug-resistant HIV strains, and lead to more infections.

The FDA panelists acknowledged that concern, and said people should be tested to make sure they don't have HIV before starting Truvada. Patients who already have the virus and begin taking Truvada could develop a resistance to the drug, making their disease even more difficult to treat.

Justin Terry-Smith, a Washington, D.C.-area writer with HIV, has different concerns. He took Truvada for four years to suppress his infection. He said he has friends with the AIDS virus in other cities who can't find the drug, and he worries that making it widely available for prevention could result in shortages and pose problems for patients who need it for treatment.

"There has to much more production of this drug for this to actually go forward," he said.

His doctor recently put him on another drug regimen - switching medicines is a common tactic in HIV treatment. But unlike his other HIV medicines, Truvada had no side effects, and he said it needs to remain available for already infected patients.

Sterman said approval of Truvada for prevention would be unlikely to lead to shortages because the drug would only be recommended for people at high risk for getting the virus.

"I don't think demand for it is going to be that high," she said.

Truvada's costs are another concern. But supporters of the drug note that the lifetime cost of treating one person diagnosed with the AIDS virus has been estimated at more than $600,000.

"It's much more cost-effective to prevent a new infection than it is to treat someone for their lifetime," Loduca said. "Of course the ultimate goal is a vaccine and a cure but we're many years away from that."

Jim Pickett, director of prevention advocacy and gay men's health at the AIDS Foundation of Chicago, has had the AIDS virus since 1995. He says his medical costs, including medicine and doctor visits, have continually increased since then and now total about $20,000 a year, mostly covered by his health insurance.

He took Truvada for a while for HIV treatment and had no complications. Side effects from long-term use are uncertain, but some of the more serious complications linked with include kidney and liver problems.

The potential for those problems shouldn't be dismissed, but it's not a reason to reject using the for , said Pickett, whose group is not affiliated with the San Francisco foundation.

For some people, the risk for kidney problems "10 years down the line may be less than the risk for acquiring HIV, which is significantly more problematic and can be fatal," Pickett said.

"We need options for people. This is one option. It wouldn't be an option for everybody. It's not meant for everybody," Pickett said.

More information: FDA: http://www.fda.gov

AIDS: http://www.aids.gov

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

FDA panel backs first pill to block HIV infection

May 11, 2012

The first drug shown to prevent HIV infection won the endorsement of a panel of federal advisers Thursday, clearing the way for a landmark approval in the 30-year fight against the virus that causes AIDS.

AIDS prevention pill study halted; no benefit seen

Apr 18, 2011

Researchers are stopping a study that tests a daily pill to prevent infection with the AIDS virus in thousands of African women because partial results show no signs that the drug is doing any good.

Recommended for you

South Africa's life expectancy jumps to 61.2 years

9 hours ago

Life expectancy in AIDS-hit South Africa has shot up sharply over the past decade, thanks to life prolonging anti-retroviral (ARVs) treatment, latest estimates from the country's statistics agency showed Thursday.

User comments