Multimodality approach needed to reengineer health care

February 20, 2013
Multimodality approach needed to reengineer health care
A multimodality approach focusing on reengineering the U.S. health care system may provide a way to improve quality and reduce costs, according to a viewpoint published in the Feb. 20 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

(HealthDay)—A multimodality approach focusing on reengineering the U.S. health care system may provide a way to improve quality and reduce costs, according to a viewpoint published in the Feb. 20 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Noting that changes to the existing health system are necessary, but have proved insufficient to both improve quality and reduce costs, Ari Hoffman, M.D., from the University of California in San Francisco, and Ezekiel J. Emanuel, M.D., Ph.D., from the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, discuss whether a single approach could improve the process while controlling costs, with a focus on reengineering the care delivery process.

According to the authors, and based on analysis of models from industry, a multimodality approach is needed to improve quality and reduce costs, which will rethink the overall process rather than focusing on individual tasks. Reengineering involves rethinking, redesign, and application of necessary tools, focusing on health outcomes. Rethinking will address issues such as who provides health services, how they are paid for, and how much should be paid for these services. Redesign could include radical change in the fields of education, research, infrastructure, and public health, as well as new systems of health care delivery and payment. Tools such as , decision support, reform of malpractice, and care coordination should be built on a solid foundation.

"No single change will solve the health care value problem," the authors write. "With a focus on reengineering, the nation may succeed not only in implementing systematic , but reform that actually improves the health of Americans while simultaneously controlling unsustainable costs."

Explore further: Can payment and other innovations improve the quality and value of health care?

More information: Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Related Stories

ERs need to focus on integration into new payment models

January 19, 2013

(HealthDay)—Emergency care systems need to focus on integrating into new payment models by promoting efficiency and coordinated care, according to an article published online Jan. 2 in the Annals of Emergency Medicine.

Recommended for you

Bacteria in smokeless tobacco products may be a health concern

August 26, 2016

Several species of bacteria found in smokeless tobacco products have been associated with opportunistic infections, according to a paper published August 26 in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, a journal of the American ...

Is tailgating toxic?

August 26, 2016

While tailgating this football season you may want to take a step back from the grill and generator—for your health.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Wolf358
not rated yet Feb 20, 2013
I suggest that costs can be reduced and care improved by removing from the equation the number-one source of waste: Insurance Company Profits. "Profits" are in this case the large fraction of resources which are _never_ applied to the actual health care of anyone, except that of the profiteers.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.