Multiple procedure payment reduction policy needs work

Multiple procedure payment reduction policy needs work
Current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services multiple procedure payment reduction policy overestimated the work efficiencies in physician services when same-session, multiple imaging services are provided by different physicians in the same group practice, according to research published online April 9 in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

(HealthDay)—Current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) multiple procedure payment reduction (MPPR) policy overestimated the work efficiencies in physician services when same-session, multiple imaging services are provided by different physicians in the same group practice, according to research published online April 9 in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

Richard Duszak, Jr., M.D., of the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute in Reston, Va., and colleagues analyzed data from the Medicare Resource-Based Relative Value Scale to identify and quantify physician work efficiencies for different same-session diagnostic imaging studies interpreted by different physicians in the same practice.

According to the researchers, there were no potential intra-service duplications when different examination interpretations were provided by different physicians in the same group practice. The maximum potential duplicated pre- and post-service activities ranged from 5 percent for radiography, fluoroscopy, and to 13.6 percent for computed tomography (CT). The potential work reductions corresponds to maximum Medicare professional component physician fee reductions of 1.23 ± 0.38 percent, which is much less than the 25 percent reduction per MPPR policy implemented by CMS.

"In contrast to the single systematic 25 percent professional payment reduction implemented by CMS, our 's code-specific analysis supports MPPR discounts averaging only 1.23 percent when subsequent different services are rendered by different physicians in the same group," the authors write. "Greater CMS methodological rigor, transparency, and accountability in policy development are warranted."

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Medicare pay cut for doctors not in e-prescribing program

Jan 15, 2013

(HealthDay)—Medicare-participating physicians who failed to meet the requirements for Medicare's Electronic Prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program in 2012 are being informed of their penalty for 2013, according ...

Recommended for you

Obama offers new accommodations on birth control

2 hours ago

The Obama administration will offer a new accommodation to religious nonprofits that object to covering birth control for their employees. The measure allows those groups to notify the government, rather than their insurance ...

Use a rule of thumb to control how much you drink

2 hours ago

Sticking to a general rule of pouring just a half glass of wine limits the likelihood of overconsumption, even for men with a higher body mass index. That's the finding of a new Iowa State and Cornell University ...

Many patients are discharged without a diagnosis

6 hours ago

Chest pain, breathing difficulties, fainting. Each year approx. 265,000 Danes are acutely admitted to medical departments with symptoms of serious illness. New research from Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital ...

Wellness visits, physicals need different documentation

6 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Documentation rules for annual wellness visits (AWVs) for Medicare differ from those for preventive visits, which are not covered by Medicare, according to an article published Aug. 5 in Medical Ec ...

User comments