Blindness more than a pain in the neck

April 5, 2013
Blindness more than a pain in the neck
Credit: Shutterstock

(Medical Xpress)—Surveys regularly reveal that, when asked about their greatest fear, people nominate blindness as one of the two things they dread most (cancer being the other).

And yet, the "disability weighting" – a measure of the severity of a disease on a scale from 0 (perfect health) to 1 (equivalent to death) – which appears in the 's most recent Global Burden of Disease (GBD) register puts blindness (0.195) at less than the pain of the neck (0.221).

Flinders University's Head of and , Professor Konrad Pesudovs, together with Professor Hugh Taylor from the University of Melbourne and a group of international colleagues, are leading a campaign to have the weighting reassessed.

They have taken their fight to one of the world's leading , The Lancet.

Professor Taylor, who is Harold Mitchell Chair of Indigenous , told Flinders Indaily on a recent visit to Flinders that the weighting "didn't pass the common sense test".

"The impact of blindness is much more than (0.292) or having a once a month (0.259). It doesn't stand to reason with anything we've know from the past or what we feel ourselves," Professor Taylor said.

While likening the efforts of the many hundreds of researchers around the world who contributed to the GBD to "putting man on the moon", Professor Taylor and his colleagues believe the questions put to survey participants need to be further validated.

"We would like to see some further studies done to try to test the wording of those different questions to see how susceptible the method is to the questions that were asked," he said.

"In the past, people have calculated weights for disability by asking doctors or experts about how they think different diseases affect different people; the next method was to ask focus groups of patients. This time, the researchers just went out to people in the street.

"I'm not questioning the integrity of the researchers or the way the research was done, because both are outstanding. But I think the little building blocks might need a bit more work."

Explore further: $70 million to close the gap on treatable Australian Indigenous eye health

More information: www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2812%2962081-9/fulltext

Related Stories

Telemedicine vision for remote eye care

April 30, 2012

(Medical Xpress) -- Optometrists from Flinders University will soon be able to diagnose and manage eye diseases in rural and remote communities – all from the comfort of their computer chair.

Recommended for you

Can nicotine protect the aging brain?

September 20, 2016

Everyone knows that tobacco products are bad for your health, and even the new e-cigarettes may have harmful toxins. However, according to research at Texas A&M, it turns out the nicotine itself—when given independently ...

Science can shape healthy city planning

September 23, 2016

Previous studies have shown a correlation between the design of cities and growing epidemics of injuries and non-communicable diseases such as heart disease, diabetes and cancer. A three-part series published in The Lancet ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.