Mandatory helmet laws decrease head injuries among cyclists of all ages, study finds

by Kate Toogood
Mandatory helmet laws decrease head injuries among cyclists of all ages, study finds
UAlberta researchers found that head injuries among kids and adults dropped after helmet laws were introduced.

New research from the University of Alberta shows that bicycle helmet legislation is having the right kind of impact on head injuries.

Research from professors Donald Voaklander and Duncan Saunders and PhD candidate Mohammad Karkhaneh in the U of A's School of Public Health shows that mandatory helmet legislation decreases head injuries in multiple age groups.

For the study, recently published in the Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, the researchers scrutinized Alberta Health data on hospitalizations and emergency department visits before and after helmet legislation was introduced. They looked at data from February 1999 to March 2007 involving child, teen and adult cyclists. To control for general trends in , the researchers included data on pedestrian injuries.

"We found that the rate of head injuries for child cyclists for both hospitalizations and emergency department visits decreased significantly (by nine per cent and 30 per cent respectively), and head injuries in adolescents and adults decreased for hospitalizations (by 36 per cent and 24 per cent respectively)," said Voaklander.

"We found that the number of head injuries in emergency department visits increased marginally for adults after legislation was introduced, but that's probably attributable to the increased profile of and sensitivity to concussions in the past few years," he added.

"When an adult hits their head, they're more likely today to be concerned about concussions and get checked out, but less likely to be hospitalized."

Voaklander says this research is contrary to the results of other research—and to the views of helmet legislation critics who suggest enforcing helmet use doesn't reduce .

"The existing published research could reflect a cultural bias because it is published in journals from countries where the discussion on the importance of hasn't yet happened, and likely won't, given the "share the road" culture that exists between drivers and cyclists in these countries," he said. "It seems to be much safer to cycle in places such as Europe, so the need for people to wear helmets may not be as great."

According to Voaklander, critics (including bicycling groups in Edmonton) have argued that such laws actually contribute to obesity and global warming by deterring people from biking because they don't own a helmet or don't want to wear one. He adds that there is currently a lot of pressure on cities to add drop-off bike programs, allowing people to borrow and return bicycles at various locations throughout the city. According to advocates, these programs help combat obesity and reduce global warming, but Voaklander notes that the bikes available through these programs don't come with helmets. This results in a corporate interest in encouraging people to cycle, but not necessarily to cycle safely.

"The contention that people will cycle less if you make them wear helmets is unproven—in fact, cycling rates have gone up in Canada over the past few years," Voaklander explains. "Now, it seems that a public health intervention is being incorrectly blamed for causing other problems."

Voaklander says the research presents definitive evidence that helmets remain an important injury prevention strategy. He plans to conduct similar research in St. Albert, where a municipal law dictates that helmets must be worn by everyone, and compare the results with those from the rest of the province.

"In these situations, we need to put the desire for cycling-group membership or corporate investment aside and focus on the data. It's the data that will tell us what interventions are working and are helping people lead healthy, active lives."

More information: www.sciencedirect.com/science/… ii/S0001457513002261

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Bicycle helmets prevent fatal head injuries

Oct 15, 2012

Cyclists who died of a head injury were three times as likely to not be wearing a helmet compared with those who died of other injuries, according to a study in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

Cyclist's benefit from helmets clearly shown

May 06, 2013

Cyclists who don't wear a helmet are almost six times more likely to suffer a severe head injury than their helmeted counterparts, according University of Sydney research published in the latest issue of the Medical Journal of ...

Recommended for you

The hunt for botanicals

18 hours ago

Herbal medicine can be a double-edged sword and should be more rigorously investigated for both its beneficial and harmful effects, say researchers writing in a special supplement of Science.

Mozambique decriminalises abortion to stem maternal deaths

19 hours ago

Mozambique has passed a law permitting women to terminate unwanted pregnancies under specified conditions, a move hailed by activists in a country where clandestine abortions account for a large number of maternal deaths.

Infertility, surrogacy in India

19 hours ago

Infertility is a growing problem worldwide. A World Health Organization report estimates that 60-to-80 million couples worldwide currently suffer from infertility.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

NikDow
not rated yet Sep 14, 2013
Does the study present data on number of cycling trips by the target age-group? An equally plausible hypothesis is that the drop in injuries was caused by a drop in cycling rates - this has been the case in Australia and New Zealand for example.
richard_burton_5496
not rated yet Sep 14, 2013
With respect, this headline is not correct, and the research does not show a clear benefit from cycle helmets. What it shows is that there was a reduction in cyclists attending hospitals after helmet legislation was introduced, but, as the previous poste has already pointed out, without exposure data, the conclusions are not justified.

In every case which has been examined, of the effects of helmet legislation, the fall in the number of head injuries to cyclists is more than explained by the fall in the number of cyclists, so the risk goes up not down.

There are many examples of research showing massive benefits from cycle helmets, but in all of these, there are methodological shortcomings that make their conclusions untenable, and they have been disproved on peer review. The research showing no benefits is robust and has been proved so on peer review.

The only two proven effects of helmet laws are a fall in the number of cyclists and obscene profits for those selling helmets.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.