High doses of antidepressants appear to increase risk of self-harm in children young adult

Antidepressant
Fluoxetine (Prozac). Image: Wikimedia Commons

Children and young adults who start antidepressant therapy at high doses, rather than the "modal" [average or typical] prescribed doses, appear to be at greater risk for suicidal behavior during the first 90 days of treatment.

A previous meta-analysis by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of antidepressant trials suggested that children who received antidepressants had twice the rate of suicidal ideation and behavior than children who were given a placebo. The authors of the current study sought to examine suicidal behavior and antidepressant dose, and whether risk depended on a patient's age.

The study used data from 162,625 people (between the ages of 10 to 64 years) with depression who started antidepressant treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor at modal (the most prescribed doses on average) or at higher than modal doses from 1998 through 2010.

The rate of suicidal behavior (deliberate self-harm or DSH) among children and adults (24 years or younger) who started antidepressant therapy at high doses was about twice as high compared with a matched group of patients who received generally prescribed doses. The authors suggest this corresponds to about one additional event of DSH for every 150 patients treated with high-dose therapy. For adults 25 to 64 years old, the difference in risk for suicidal behavior was null. The study does not address why higher doses might lead to higher suicide risk.

Follow Medical Xpress updates on Facebook: facebook.com/medicalxpress

"Considered in light of recent meta-analyses concluding that the efficacy of antidepressant therapy for youth seems to be modest, and separate evidence that dose is generally unrelated to the therapeutic efficacy of antidepressants, our findings offer clinicians an additional incentive to avoid initiating pharmacotherapy at high-therapeutic doses and to monitor all patients starting antidepressants, especially youth, for several months and regardless of history of DSH." Matthew Miller, M.D., Sc.D., of the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, and colleagues wrote in their JAMA Internal Medicine article.

In a related commentary, David A. Brent, M.D., of the University of Pittsburgh, and Robert Gibbons, Ph.D., of the University of Chicago, write: "In summary Miller et al are to be commended on a thoughtful and careful analysis of the effects of initiating antidepressants at higher than modal doses."

"Their findings suggest that higher than modal initial dosing leads to an increased risk for DSH and adds further support to current clinical recommendations to begin treatment with lower antidepressant doses. While initiation at higher than modal doses of antidepressants may be deleterious, this study does not address the effect of dose escalation," they continue.

"Moreover, while definitive studies on the impact of dose escalation in the face of nonresponse remain to be done, there are promising studies that suggest in certain subgroups, dose escalation can be of benefit. Finally it should be noted that in this study, there was no pre-exposure to post-exposure increase in after the initiation of antidepressants in youth treated at the modal dosage," they conclude.

More information: JAMA Intern Med. Published online April 28, 2014. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1053
JAMA Intern Med. Published online April 28, 2014. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14016

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Antidepressant-suicide link in youths absent in new analysis

Feb 06, 2012

In 2004, concerns about antidepressant drugs increasing suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young patients prompted the FDA to issue a rare "black box warning." Now, a new analysis of clinical trial data finds that treatment ...

Recommended for you

Declining loneliness among American teenagers

11 hours ago

There has been a growing concern that modern society is increasingly lonely. In 2006, a New York Times article "The Lonely American Just Got a Bit Lonelier" highlighted research that shows a decline in soc ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

allowmetopost
5 / 5 (2) Apr 28, 2014
Let alone the 99% of mass shooters are all on some sort of anti-depressant. But it's the guns fault.
blow vee ate
5 / 5 (2) Apr 28, 2014
This is amazing news. The warning labels warn of suicidal and violent behavior in the test groups made up of adults, then you pump a bunch of kids (who have even less psychological foundational experience) up on it with manly man sized dosages and you get......
Extremely violent and suicidal behavior!

Im astounded. Floored. I need to pick my jaw back up.

Really, there needs to be some liability suits or some kind of AMA sanctioning on all these "professionals" who think doping our children up on massive doses of psycho drugs is a great idea and the parents need to be slapped everlasting silly.
majorjohnson
3 / 5 (2) Apr 28, 2014
Once again we end up with scientists telling us they know the deal and government using that as justification for pushing an agenda. It's gotten to where I trust a scientist as far as I can throw a politician.
hunsakers5225
5 / 5 (2) Apr 28, 2014
Surprise, surprise! You need anti-depressant - smoke some pot..... oh...wait.... it might cause to feel better.... can't do that because big drug companies can't make big bucks and give large amounts to politicians! Wake up America.
JamesWebbsSpaceScope
not rated yet Apr 29, 2014
Once again we end up with scientists telling us they know the deal and government using that as justification for pushing an agenda. It's gotten to where I trust a scientist as far as I can throw a politician.


Science "bad" !

Just because the big pharma "Scientits" are garbage, that doesn't mean all scientists are like that. Quire the opposite is true.

This study shows an example of why the actual scientists are not important however. The only thing that matters is the actual Science. There are no authorities in science.

Your stance of not trusting scientists is highly illogical. Look to the science itself.

Politicians on the other hand are generally terrible people.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.