NIH funds study of malpractice risk, cardiac testing incentives

NIH funds study of malpractice risk, cardiac testing incentives
The National Institutes of Health has granted $2 million to study the effect of malpractice risk and financial incentives on cardiac testing.

(HealthDay)—The National Institutes of Health has granted $2 million to study the effect of malpractice risk and financial incentives on cardiac testing.

Steven Farmer, M.D., Ph.D., from the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences in Washington, D.C., will use the funds over the next five years to study the effects of medical malpractice on physicians' practice of . A multi-disciplinary team made up of lawyers, clinicians, economists, and policy makers will conduct the work.

Specifically, Farmer will study interrelated motivations behind test orders, including patient benefit, , and malpractice liability. Findings from this research can help inform state malpractice reform and federal payment reform. Ultimately, Farmer says the goal is improving the value of the health care the system delivers.

"Physicians and have multiple motivations for testing, first and foremost for the patient benefit," Farmer said in a university news release. "However, there is a good deal of evidence to suggest that physicians also respond to financial incentives and frequently report they test patients because of concern for malpractice and lawsuits."

More information: More Information

Copyright © 2014 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: NIH funds study of malpractice risk, cardiac testing incentives (2014, September 29) retrieved 26 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-09-nih-funds-malpractice-cardiac-incentives.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Physicians' malpractice concerns predict more testing

 shares

Feedback to editors