Self-Paced Brain-Computer Interface Gets Closer to Reality

January 15, 2008 By Lisa Zyga, Medical Xpress feature
Self-Paced Brain-Computer Interface Gets Closer to Reality
Data from a sample EEG is measured from one second before to one second after a decision point. The data is used to classify the neurological phenomena when making a decision. Credit: Fatourechi, et al.

Using the human mind to control computers could lead to a wide range of applications, such as giving people with limited motion the ability to operate machines. However, translating thoughts into actions is a great challenge for researchers. How can a system determine which thoughts should be acted upon, and which thoughts are merely personal thoughts and therefore should be ignored by the system?

More importantly, asks Dr. Mehrdad Fatourechi, can the system provide the users with the ability to control a computer whenever they want? These are the questions that Fatourechi and other “self-paced” brain computer interface (BCI) researchers are trying to answer.

So far, no self-paced BCI system has performed well enough to be suitable for practical applications. But Fatourechi, along with Professors Dr. Rabab K. Ward and Dr. Gary E. Birch from the University of British Columbia, Canada, have recently made a significant improvement with the development of a self-paced, fully automated brain-computer interface. The group’s results are published in a recent issue of the Journal of Neural Engineering.

To test the abilities of a self-paced BCI, researchers often ask volunteers to perform a specific mental activity, such as to attempt to move their right index finger. The system then tries to detect the changes in the brain signals related to this mental activity (called neurological phenomenon) and map them into a control command for the device.

To researchers, confronting this problem means striving for a low false positive rate (when the system accidentally performs an action that the user did not intend) combined with a high true positive rate (when the system accurately identifies and acts upon a user’s mental commands). Researchers generally consider a true-positive rate of 70% to be acceptable for realistic situations. The false positive rate should ideally be zero, since a system that acts spontaneously would be very frustrating to users.

“The main reason [that it’s difficult to differentiate EEG signals] is that the signal-to-noise ratio of the neurological phenomena that the system tries to detect is very low,” Fatourechi told PhysOrg.com. “In other words, the level of noise is very high in a BCI system. Our system uses a rather complex feature classification method to achieve this task.”

Previously, the researchers had developed a self-paced BCI that could achieve a very low false positive rate (0.5%), but the true positive rate was also quite low, at 27.3%. The interface used three separate neurological phenomena: movement-related potentials, and changes in the power of Beta and Mu rhythms. All of these neurological phenomena are believed to be present in the EEG signals when a user attempts to perform a movement activity, so the researchers postulated that their simultaneous detection could improve the performance of the BCI systems.

This previous BCI system was considered to be semi-automated because some parts of the design were not automatic. In an attempt to improve the true-positive rate, the researchers changed the design to be fully automated in a few ways. First, they developed a “hybrid genetic algorithm” which automatically and simultaneously selects the parameters of different parts of the system that together yield the near-optimal performance. Also, the researchers employed more complex feature extraction and classification methods, and instead of using monopolar EEG signals, they used bipolar EEG signals to increase the number of the signals. The bipolar signals could also generate more discriminant features of different signals used for different thought processes.

“We believe the key factor is fully automating the structure of the system,” said Fatourechi. “Selecting a good ‘model’ for a BCI system is a delicate process, and if it is not done properly, it can decrease the performance significantly. By ‘fully’ automating the model selection process, we removed any subjectivity from the design of our BCI system and, as a result, improved the performance.”

Incorporating these improvements, the researchers’ new interface performed with a low false positive rate and “modest” true positive rate. On tests with four able-bodied subjects, the average false positive rate was 0.1%, and the average true positive rate was 56.2%, with one subject achieving rates as good as 0.0% and 64.2%, respectively. The researchers speculate that the ratio between the two rates is the best that has been reported for an EEG-based self-paced BCI system.

In the future, the researchers plan to study how to improve the distinct EEG pattern quality in the lower-performing subjects compared with the higher quality distinctions in the higher-performing subjects. They also want to explore methods to reduce interference caused by artifacts such as eye movements, which can significantly affect the movement-related potentials component of the system. Future studies will also investigate how individuals with limited motor abilities can work with the interface, as those individuals may benefit the most from brain-computer interfaces.

“With the low false positive rates that we have achieved, we believe implementing a self-paced EEG-based BCI system can be implemented for practical applications in the next couple of years,” said Fatourechi. “We have to further improve the performance during the presence of artifacts and carry out some online experiments using the proposed system.”

More information: Fatourechi, M, Ward, R K, and Birch, G E. “A self-paced brain-computer interface system with a low false positive rate.” J. Neural Eng. 5 (2008) 9-23.

Copyright 2007 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.

Explore further: Gene-expression-based biomarker predicts long-term risk of breast cancer recurrence

Related Stories

Gene-expression-based biomarker predicts long-term risk of breast cancer recurrence

September 11, 2013
A comparison of three methods of predicting the risk of recurrence in women treated for estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer finds that only the breast cancer index (BCI) – a biomarker based on the expression levels ...

Self-calibration enhances BrainGate brain computer interface ease, reliability

November 11, 2015
A new study in Science Translational Medicine describes three software innovations that substantially improved the user experience and performance of the BrainGate brain computer interface (BCI). Researchers said the gains ...

Brain-computer interface advance allows fast, accurate typing by people with paralysis

February 21, 2017
A clinical research publication led by Stanford University investigators has demonstrated that a brain-to-computer hookup can enable people with paralysis to type via direct brain control at the highest speeds and accuracy ...

If you can't beat them, join them: Grandmother cells revisited

May 10, 2013
(Medical Xpress)—In the absence of any real progress in defining neuronal codes for the brain, the simple idea of the grandmother cell continues to percolate through the scientific and popular literature. Many researchers ...

Recommended for you

Gene mutation found to cause macrocephaly and intellectual deficits

November 13, 2018
The absence of one copy of a single gene in the brain causes a rare, as-yet-unnamed neurological disorder, according to new research that builds on decades of work by a University at Buffalo biochemist and his colleagues.

Can scientists change mucus to make it easier to clear, limiting harm to lungs?

November 12, 2018
For healthy people, mucus is our friend. It traps potential pathogens so our airways can dispatch nasty bugs before they cause harm to our lungs. But for people with conditions such as cystic fibrosis (CF) and chronic obstructive ...

Mutations, CRISPR, and the biology behind movement disorders

November 12, 2018
Scientists at the RIKEN Center for Brain Science (CBS) in Japan have discovered how mutations related to a group of movement disorders produce their effects. Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the ...

Researchers explain how your muscles form

November 12, 2018
All vertebrates need muscles to function; they are the most abundant tissue in the human body and are integral to movement.

Salmonella found to be resistant to different classes of antibiotics

November 12, 2018
Brazil's Ministry of Health received reports of 11,524 outbreaks of foodborne diseases between 2000 and 2015, with 219,909 individuals falling sick and 167 dying from such diseases. Bacteria caused most outbreaks of such ...

High fat diet has lasting effects on the liver

November 9, 2018
Consuming a high-fat, high-sugar diet causes a harmful accumulation of fat in the liver that may not reverse even after switching to a healthier diet, according to a new study by scientists from Weill Cornell Medicine and ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nikola
3.6 / 5 (5) Jan 15, 2008
I'll be glad when I no longer have to use a mouse and keyboard. In the future, we'll be able to imagine 3D objects and a CAD-like program will generate the virtural representation. Universal assemblers will then build the physical object. Don't think so? 10-15 years ago the Internet did not really exist as it does now. What will the next 50-100 years bring? An end to disease, energy shortages, etc. At least I'm hoping.
out7x
2 / 5 (2) Jan 17, 2008
A fMRI would be much more accurate than an EEG.
KB6
2.5 / 5 (2) Jan 20, 2008
"A fMRI would be much more accurate than an EEG."
---
Perhaps, but not nearly as portable. If we could squeeze the functionality of fMRI into something the size and weight of an EEG cap that would be very cool. But I have no idea how that could be done or if it's even physically possible.
I also wonder if some kind of guided imagery by the users could increase the accuracy of EEG based BCI. For example, telling them to imagine a big, bright red circle, square or other vivid or evocative sight when trying to perform a specific task. This might bring into play enough added cortical electrical activity from other parts of the brain to help raise the signal above the noise. It may not be the most convenient way to go about things but it just might work.
BrianH
1 / 5 (1) Jan 27, 2008
KB6;
I agree, but complex and rapid sequences of actions like mouse movements and reactions would need much less than 1 sec. responsiveness and would be unbearable with a 30% false negative (dropped action) rate.
bkas
1 / 5 (1) Jan 03, 2009
We track research and development efforts in this field, and you can find the latest brain-computer innovations at www.thegoalmine.com

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.