White House frames health care as economic problem

June 2, 2009 By ERICA WERNER , Associated Press Writer
FILE - In this March 31, 2009 file photo, Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., listens to remarks on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

(AP) -- A Senate chairman who will have a major role in writing health care legislation said Tuesday he hopes to convince President Barack Obama that taxing some employer-provided benefits will help control escalating costs.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., faces a hard sell. During his campaign for president, Obama ruled out taxing health benefits provided by employers.

"I know that's an issue we have to work out with the president, but I think it's an issue we will work out," said Baucus, who is among several Senate Democrats scheduled to meet with Obama Tuesday afternoon.

Baucus says the tax-free benefit packages Americans now enjoy are a big factor in the high costs of the country's , because they provide workers free or low-cost access to too many health care services.

The senator's recommendation came at a White House event where Obama advisers released a new economic report that links fixing the economy with overhauling the costly U.S. health care system.

Obama is pushing Congress to enact sweeping health legislation this year to hold down costs and provide health coverage for 50 million uninsured Americans.

White House officials argue that overhauling the health care system is key to turning around the economy.

The report by the White House Council of Economic Advisers says that health care costs - now about 18 percent of the gross domestic product - will rise to 34 percent in 30 years if left unchecked, wreaking havoc on the federal deficit, businesses and working Americans.

"Health care reform is incredibly important not just for the American people but for the American economy," said Christina Romer, chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers. "Good health care reform is essentially good economic policy."

Critics were quick to dismiss the report.

"Everyone agrees that reducing the cost of health care would benefit our economy, but the administration hasn't offered a credible plan to do so without raising taxes or rationing care," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Obama and his advisers have consistently sought to link health care and the economy, and they've begun turning up the volume as Congress returns from a weeklong recess.

On Monday, a coalition of industry groups submitted proposals to the White House they said would reduce the growth of their own costs by 1.5 percent a year, consistent with Obama's goals.

Obama wants legislation that would hold down costs, guarantee choice and extend coverage to the 50 million Americans who don't have it now.

Two Senate committees are crafting legislation: the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee led by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., and the Senate Finance Committee, chaired by Baucus.

The Democrats on Kennedy's committee were meeting Tuesday for a first look at an outline of Kennedy's plans. It wasn't clear if Kennedy, who has been diagnosed with brain cancer, would be present.

Neither committee has released a full bill yet. Both have circulated proposals and differences have emerged, leading Kennedy and Baucus to issue a joint statement over the weekend promising to work together.

Majority Democrats in the House and the Senate want to bring the legislation to the floor by August.

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Dog ownership linked to lower mortality

November 17, 2017
A team of Swedish scientists have used national registries of more than 3.4 million Swedes aged 40 to 80 to study the association between dog ownership and cardiovascular health. Their study shows that dog owners had a lower ...

New shoe makes running 4 percent easier, 2-hour marathon possible, study shows

November 17, 2017
Eleven days after Boulder-born Shalane Flanagan won the New York City Marathon in new state-of-the-art racing flats known as "4%s," University of Colorado Boulder researchers have published the study that inspired the shoes' ...

Vaping while pregnant could cause craniofacial birth defects, study shows

November 16, 2017
Using e-cigarettes during pregnancy could cause birth defects of the oral cavity and face, according to a recent Virginia Commonwealth University study.

Study: For older women, every movement matters

November 16, 2017
Folding your laundry or doing the dishes might not be the most enjoyable parts of your day. But simple activities like these may help prolong your life, according to the findings of a new study in older women led by the University ...

When vegetables are closer in price to chips, people eat healthier, study finds

November 16, 2017
When healthier food, like vegetables and dairy products, is pricier compared to unhealthy items, like salty snacks and sugary sweets, Americans are significantly less likely to have a high-quality diet, a new Drexel University ...

Children's exposure to secondhand smoke may be vastly underestimated by parents

November 15, 2017
Four out of 10 children in the US are exposed to secondhand smoke, according to the American Heart Association. A new Tel Aviv University study suggests that parents who smoke mistakenly rely on their own physical senses ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Jun 02, 2009
HR 676 written in 2007 had broad bi-partisan support and is supported by the majority of HANDS ON physicians, nurses and health care professionals. Why? Because it puts the care of the patient back in the hands of the providers rather than that of business/lobbyists/insurers who have had it ALL their way. By merely standardizing billing ALONE ~$300Billion would be saved ANNUALLY. To be certain, this wouldn't be the only savings or even the most savings from a single-payer system as written in this bill.

As TRILLIONS upon TRILLIONS are used to support a financial system that imploded under the weight of their own delusions, malfeasance and greed; it would be a mistake not to provide something in exchange for the tax dollars of this and future generations that is real, tangible and improves quality of life, not reduces it or marginalizes it even more than are now.

This administration's focus on IT spending to cut costs and 'preventative care" though programs and 'lifestyle choices" fails miserably to address the really wet/angry 1200 lb. gorilla in the room. The over 50 million uninsured, the tens of millions under insured and the rapidly increasing aging population whose nest eggs just got scrambled and served up on a silver platter. It is very, very disappointing considering the massive shifts being made elsewhere and going into a black-hole of 'illiquid assets' with relative swiftness and ease.

There is no substitute for hands on care of people, the facilities to provide that care and the TIME to provide it.
The free-market paradigm in health care was given every chance to perform over 25 years-it failed and failed miserably because it was never a free or competitive market, it was a captured one.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.