Men better at distance vision due to hunter-gatherer past: study

July 30, 2009
A man looks out at sea. Men are better at seeing things in the distance due to their hunter-gatherer past chasing animals, while women are better focusing on things at close range, a British study said Thursday.

Men are better at seeing things in the distance due to their hunter-gatherer past chasing animals, while women are better focusing on things at close range, a British study said Thursday.

In findings which reflect how men's and women's brains have evolved differently over thousands of years, they found that men are better at judging faraway targets.

Researchers tested their theory by asking a group of 48 men and women to use a laser pointer to mark the midpoint of lines on a piece of paper at different distances.

Men were more accurate than women when the paper was placed at a distance of 100 centimetres, while women were more accurate when the target was only 50 cms away, within arm's reach.

"Evidence already exists that separate pathways in the brain process from near and far space," said psychologist Helen Stancey from Hammersmith and West London College.

"Our results suggest that the near pathway is favoured in women and the far pathway is favoured in men," she said, in a study published online in the British Journal of Psychology.

And she said: "These in visual processing may be a result of our hunter-gatherer evolutionary legacy.

"As the predominant gatherers, women would have needed to work well in near space, whereas the for (predominantly male) hunters would have been in far space."

(c) 2009 AFP

Related Stories

Recommended for you

College students choose smartphones over food

November 16, 2018
University at Buffalo researchers have found that college students prefer food deprivation over smartphone deprivation, according to results from a paper in Addictive Behaviors.

Study finds mindfulness apps can improve mental health

November 15, 2018
A University of Otago study has found that using mindfulness meditation applications (apps) on phones is associated with improvements in people's mental health.

Social media is affecting the way we view our bodies—and not in a good way

November 15, 2018
Young women who actively engage with social media images of friends who they think are more attractive than themselves report feeling worse about their own appearance afterward, a York University study shows.

New research has revealed we are actually better at remembering names than faces

November 14, 2018
With the Christmas party season fast approaching, there will be plenty of opportunity to re-live the familiar, and excruciatingly-awkward, social situation of not being able to remember an acquaintance's name.

Older adults' abstract reasoning ability predicts depressive symptoms over time

November 14, 2018
Age-related declines in abstract reasoning ability predict increasing depressive symptoms in subsequent years, according to data from a longitudinal study of older adults in Scotland. The research is published in Psychological ...

The illusion of multitasking boosts performance

November 13, 2018
Our ability to do things well suffers when we try to complete several tasks at once, but a series of experiments suggests that merely believing that we're multitasking may boost our performance by making us more engaged in ...

9 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ArtflDgr
3 / 5 (2) Jul 30, 2009
[sarcasm]You mean that men have talents and qualities that women lack and that they are not the same? fancy that... different things are not the same[/sarcasm]
RayCherry
5 / 5 (1) Jul 30, 2009
Do you think that myopia might be the underlying cause of female partnership loyalty, and why men form men only clubs so that their women do not get to see other men at close range? mmm MMM mmm MMM

Was being ironic now; will do the ironing later.
ME_wwwing
2 / 5 (4) Jul 30, 2009
this report is not all correct.
men may look to an energy source at a greater distances.
but women can see a males eyes at greater distances.
ever look at a woman walking towards ya? they turn the heads because they can see your looking at them. yet a male never sees her eyes.

ps. men do NOT look at a womans a$$. they look to the Ovaries Energy. same with women they look to a males balls. this is true when ones eyes are turned from the looker.
queers just look to see.
david_42
not rated yet Jul 30, 2009
Very little hunting occurs at the distance of 100 cm. To be valid, the study needs to be conducted at 'a stone's throw'. If it holds up at 25-50 meters, the conclusion might be believable.
defunctdiety
5 / 5 (1) Jul 30, 2009
Very little hunting occurs at the distance of 100 cm. To be valid, the study needs to be conducted at 'a stone's throw'. If it holds up at 25-50 meters, the conclusion might be believable.

Actually, if you're an aqua-ape fan a lot of hunting would have taken place at close range (spear fishing). Furthermore, even attacks on large prey would not have taken place at 25-50 meters, even modern man doesn't hunt at that distance unless he has a rifle and probably scope.

Man was not a successful hunter because he was accurate and could kill from long distances, he was successful because he could use tactics, wound an animal and track it until it gives up or dies from exhaustion.

I do agree however that 100 cm seems to be a little close, plus the study seems to say as much about hand-eye coordination as eyesight.
ontheinternets
not rated yet Jul 30, 2009
... plus the study seems to say as much about hand-eye coordination as eyesight.


Ding! This is what I wanted to point out (pun not intended). They're pointing at something using a laser pointer from a distance. Assuming equal eyesight, I would be very surprised if guys did not fare better at such tasks. Guys tend to get more experience pointing, throwing and whatnot (and evolutionarily speaking, it may make sense if guys developed a bit of evolutionary advantage at tasks often performed by guys -- but you need evidence for that). It would also be expected that women on average would traditionally (in just about any culture) fare better at finer close-ranged tasks. There's no explanation of how they corrected for hand-eye coordination, if at all. I'd rather they had the dot wander around the midpoint and have them judge when it looks best (correcting for patience and such of course).
GaryB
5 / 5 (1) Jul 31, 2009
> 100 centimetres, while women were more accurate when
> the target was only 50 cms away, within arm's reach.

That's why us men are better at searching the horizon ... because we can point to something 3 feet away better than the chicks. I hope the study isn't actually as idiotic as this article.
defunctdiety
not rated yet Jul 31, 2009
We utilized throw weapons capable of up to a 40 yard throw with a good degree of accuracy.

I enjoy anthropology but I'm not much of a student of it, so I won't argue... too much. ;P

While atlatls had a great range and power (and I'm sure they had to take quite a few shots at 25m ), and were capable of wounding/killing beyond close range, I still can't imagine them being actually reliable beyond 25m.
fizzbliss
1.8 / 5 (5) Aug 01, 2009
This article makes a claim but provides no actual numbers to support the statements contained within it. To whomever wrote or posted this article, can you provide the percentages? I would like to know if there was the differences were statistically significant, or only if there were only slight differences. It would be easier to read it here than to try and find the paper. Thanks.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.