Reusable Grocery Bags Contaminated With E. Coli, Other Bacteria

June 24, 2010, University of Arizona
Reusable Grocery Bags Contaminated With E. Coli, Other Bacteria
Salmonella, shown here growing in a culture dish, is one of the contaminants found in some of the reusable grocery bags studied.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists at the UA and Loma Linda University found that reusable grocery bags carry more than just groceries. Samples taken from dozens of bags, which almost never get washed, showed half contained E. coli and other bacteria that could pose health risks.

Reusable grocery bags can be a breeding ground for dangerous food-borne bacteria and pose a serious risk to public health, according to a joint food-safety research report issued today by the University of Arizona and Loma Linda University in California.

The research study - which randomly tested reusable grocery bags carried by shoppers in Tucson, Los Angeles and San Francisco - also found consumers were almost completely unaware of the need to regularly wash their bags.

"Our findings suggest a serious threat to public health, especially from coliform bacteria including E. coli, which were detected in half of the bags sampled," said Charles Gerba, a UA professor of soil, water and environmental science and co-author of the study. "Furthermore, consumers are alarmingly unaware of these risks and the critical need to sanitize their bags on a weekly basis."

Bacteria levels found in reusable bags were significant enough to cause a wide range of serious health problems and even death. They are a particular danger for young children, who are especially vulnerable to food-borne illnesses, Gerba said.

The study also found that awareness of potential risks was very low. A full 97 percent of those interviewed never washed or bleached their reusable bags, said Gerba, adding that thorough washing kills nearly all bacteria that accumulate in reusable bags.

The report comes at a time when some members of the California Legislature, through Assembly Bill 1998, are seeking to promote increased consumer use of reusable bags by banning plastic bags from California stores.

"If this is the direction California wants to go, our policymakers should be prepared to address the ramifications for public health," said co-author Ryan Sinclair, a professor at Loma Linda University's School of Public Health.

The report noted that "a sudden or significant increase in use of reusable bags without a major public education campaign on how to reduce cross contamination would create the risk of significant adverse public health impact."

Geographic factors also play a role, said Sinclair, who noted that contamination rates appeared to be higher in Los Angeles than in the two other locations - a phenomenon likely due to that region's weather being more conducive to growth of bacteria in reusable bags.

The report, "Assessment of the Potential for Cross Contamination of Food Products by Reusable Shopping Bags," offered the following policy recommendations for lawmakers, as well as tips for consumers who use reusable grocery bags:

• States should consider requiring printed instructions on reusable bags indicating they need to cleaned or bleached between uses.

• State and local governments should invest in a public education campaign to alert the public about risk and prevention.

• When using reusable bags, consumers should be careful to separate raw foods from other food products.

• Consumers should not use reusable food bags for other purposes such as carrying books or gym clothes.

• Consumers should not store meat or produce in the trunks of their cars because the higher temperature promotes growth of , which can contaminate reusable bags.

"As scientists, our focus was not on the relative merits of paper, plastic or reusable grocery bags," Gerba said. "Our intent was purely to provide relevant data to better inform consumers and lawmakers about the dimensions that could arise from increased use of reusable bags. With this knowledge, people will be in a better position to protect their health and that of their children."

About the report:

Field research for "Assessment of the Potential for Cross Contamination of Food Products by Reusable Shopping Bags" was conducted according to established scientific methodologies and best practices.

The samples tested included 84 actual consumer reusable bags (25 in Los Angeles, 25 in San Francisco, 34 in Tucson). All but four of those bags were made of woven polypropylene. New reusable bags and plastic bags were tested; none contained any contamination.

The American Chemistry Council underwrote the research project, which was conducted independently of the organization.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Women run faster after taking newly developed supplement, study finds

January 19, 2018
A new study found that women who took a specially prepared blend of minerals and nutrients for a month saw their 3-mile run times drop by almost a minute.

Americans are getting more sleep

January 19, 2018
Although more than one in three Americans still don't get enough sleep, a new analysis shows first signs of success in the fight for more shut eye. According to data from 181,335 respondents aged 15 and older who participated ...

Wine is good for you—to a point

January 18, 2018
The Mediterranean diet has become synonymous with healthy eating, but there's one thing in it that stands out: It's cool to drink wine.

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

barakn
1 / 5 (2) Jun 24, 2010
The study also found that awareness of potential risks was very low. A full 97 percent of those interviewed never washed or bleached their reusable bags,

... making the stupid assumption that 100% of the people aware of the "risk" would wash their bags.
Shootist
1 / 5 (3) Jun 24, 2010
New reusable bags and plastic bags were tested; none contained any contamination.


caveat emptor
Skepticus
1 / 5 (1) Jun 24, 2010
This article just points out the (un)hygenic habits of adults who should have known better. After all this is NOT the Middle Ages. Anyone who is not aware of contamination, germs, etc, are morons.
barakn
not rated yet Jun 25, 2010
Of note is the underwriting by the American Chemistry Council. What they do not explicitly state (intentionally?) is that the Council represents some disposable plastic bag manufacturers. Just how independent can research like this be when the researchers know who is buttering their bread? Also worrisome is the failure to identify which strains of E. coli were found (most are not dangerous). No mention is made of the lack of reusable-bag epidemics in cities where disposables have already been banned. And finally there is the suspicious timing of the report when a bill in California has just been introduced to ban disposables.
TJ_alberta
not rated yet Jun 26, 2010
At the supermarkets where I shop all the meat and vegs go into thin film PE bags before they go into the re-usable shopping bags. Other food products come in cardboard boxes, sealed bags, jars, or cans. How many people buy a hunk of raw meat and chuck it into their shopping bag?
Skweek
not rated yet Jul 04, 2010
This is interesting information and gave me pause to think - even though this information is logical how many of us wash our reusable bags? Yes I agree that in this day and age we should be aware of the risk of contamination - but how many act on this information? Thank you for enlightening us!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.