Substantial Increase in the Price of Soda is a Successful Strategy To Decrease Purchases of Sugary Soft Drinks

June 18, 2010

( -- Imposing a bit of sticker shock may prove to be the most effective way to encourage Americans to cool off their love affair with sugary soft drinks -- possibly helping to trim the nation’s growing waistlines, according a Harvard study appearing in the American Journal of Public Health.

The study finds that a significant increase in the price of regular can change buying habits. Sales of sugary soft drinks declined by 26 percent following a price increase of 45 cents -- or 35 percent of the baseline price. For the study, regular (sugary) soft drinks were defined as carbonated beverages with calories. “Soft drinks have been increasingly recognized as a major contributor to the country’s growing obesity epidemic. A very aggressive response—such as a notable increase in the price of soda—may be needed to steer people toward healthier options,” said lead author Jason Block, M.D. of Harvard Medical School. Block also practices internal medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, where the study was conducted.

“Obesity is an important determinant of the rise in healthcare spending. More spending means higher taxes, larger deficits, and less money for other more valuable government programs. Our study suggests that higher taxes on such beverages would reduce the growth of our waistlines and the Federal deficit. And if people have commitment problems with reducing their consumption of these drinks, such taxes may even make them better off ” said Amitabh Chandra, an author of the study and a Professor at the Harvard Kennedy School.

Most prior studies on the impact of higher soft drink on purchasing habits were observational studies that analyzed trends in prices and purchases from large sales databases. These could not control for other possible factors that simultaneously influenced soda prices and soda-buying habits. This study isolated the effect of higher soft drink prices by introducing the increase, independent of other factors.

An educational campaign, which included posting messages about the potential weight loss that could result from cutting back on regular soda, was not enough to encourage soda drinkers to consider a healthier option. However, when the price increase and educational campaign were combined, there was an additional 18 percent decline in purchases of regular soda, according to the study.

Over the past 25 years, consumption of sugary soft drinks has risen substantially. Soft drinks are the single largest contributor to caloric intake in the United States. They accounted for 7 percent of all calories consumed daily from 1999 to 2001, compared to 2.8 percent from 1977 to1978. Research has shown that consumption of soft drinks not only increases rates of obesity but is associated with poor diet and a greater risk for diabetes. These links are especially strong for children.

More states and localities are considering increasing the price of soft drinks and candy through a tax or by removing an existing tax exemption. As of May 2010, 17 states, Baltimore, Philadelphia and the District of Columbia were considering soft drink tax legislation, according to the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University.

In addition to decreasing sugary soft drink sales, the 45-cent price increase on regular soda was associated with an increase in the sales of diet soft drinks. Coffee sales also increased. Consumers did not increase their purchases of juices and sugary snacks—such as cakes and cookies—when they slowed their purchases of sugar-sweetened soft drinks.

The study was conducted at the cafeteria of the 700-bed Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. Investigators imposed a 35-percent price increase on regular soft drinks sold in the cafeteria and compared sales during this period to sales during an educational campaign and during a baseline period. Researchers compared data from the neighboring Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, where no interventions, such as an educational campaign and price changes, were in place.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Experts devise plan to slash unnecessary medical testing

October 17, 2017
Researchers at top hospitals in the U.S. and Canada have developed an ambitious plan to eliminate unnecessary medical testing, with the goal of reducing medical bills while improving patient outcomes, safety and satisfaction.

New study: Nearly half of US medical care comes from emergency rooms

October 17, 2017
Nearly half of all US medical care is delivered by emergency departments, according to a new study by researchers at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM). And in recent years, the percentage of care delivered ...

No evidence that widely marketed technique to treat leaky bladder/prolapse works

October 16, 2017
There is no scientific evidence that a workout widely marketed to manage the symptoms of a leaky bladder and/or womb prolapse actually works, conclude experts in an editorial published online in the British Journal of Sports ...

Ten pence restaurant chain levy on sugary drinks linked to fall in sales

October 16, 2017
The introduction of a 10 pence levy on sugar sweetened drinks across the 'Jamie's Italian' chain of restaurants in the UK was associated with a relatively large fall in sales of these beverages of between 9 and 11 per cent, ...

New exercises help athletes manage dangerous breathing disorder

October 16, 2017
A novel set of breathing techniques developed at National Jewish Health help athletes overcome vocal cord dysfunction and improve performance during high-intensity exercise. Vocal cord dysfunction, now also referred to as ...

Learning and staying in shape key to longer lifespan, study finds

October 13, 2017
People who are overweight cut their life expectancy by two months for every extra kilogramme of weight they carry, research suggests.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (1) Jun 18, 2010
Increases in price will lead to charges of 'windfall profits' and demands to increase the price via taxation - like cigarettes.

And like alternatives to tobacco, a minute adulteration of water makes it even more irresistible - bottled water and bottled infused water.
5 / 5 (1) Jun 18, 2010
Alcoholic beverages are taxed to raise revenues toward offsetting their cost to society. High time to consider that for junk food.
5 / 5 (1) Jun 18, 2010
If the government would stop subsidizing corn maybe the price of soda would stabilize at a "natural" economic level. Damn corn drinks are terrible anyway.
2 / 5 (1) Jun 18, 2010
With a strong background in fitness and food I believe this initiative is the first step in tackling our country's obesity. Of course, what major effects will we see from this? Probably not major but it is a minor step and soon we can impose greater taxes on sugary sweets and other so called junk food.
5 / 5 (1) Jun 18, 2010
I don't think that foodstamps should be able to purchase sugary drinks, snacks, and the likes. Maybe I can start an initiative here in Smalltown Florida to stop the purchase of Soda with foodstamps. Less would be consumed if this were the case. Wallet content/power seems to limit free will (freewill, sp.?). I wonder how much of my will is controlled by my addiction to sugar. I also wonder if the lobbyists in Tallahassee would take to heart my suggestions or if they'd hear the plight of the big companies that are supported by the welfare that is spent on Soda. Thank you for this article. It makes me wonder whether profits are more important than health. I can see the sense in saving money by keeping people healthier but I don't like the suggestion that money is the only motivator. Guess that's capitalism though.
1.8 / 5 (4) Jun 18, 2010
Yes- well, as is pointed out in the article, the cost of the ill effects of sugary(primarily HFCS) snack foods and beverages is, to a great extent, passed on to taxpayers in terms of the cost to treat those effects, whether with private or public healthcare dollars.

Therefore, it seems imminently logical and proper to me that these products be taxed to offset the cost to the public generated by their indiscriminate consumption.

Additionally, as they become less attractive due to price increases, perhaps people will make at least marginally more informed food-purchasing decisions, and thereby we all benefit.

I see no reason whatsoever why private profits should be derived at (ultimately) public expense. Tax the hell out of them. AND bottled-water products.
1 / 5 (1) Jun 20, 2010
Alcoholic beverages are taxed to raise revenues toward offsetting their cost to society. High time to consider that for junk food.

"The human race divides itself politically into those who want control, and those who have no such desire." Robert A. Heinlein
1 / 5 (2) Jun 20, 2010

I wonder if Bob would have been in favor of the installation of Soda and Snack machines in schools.
Your thoughts?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.