Report: Food labels need Energy Star-like ratings

October 20, 2011 By LAURAN NEERGAARD , AP Medical Writer

Just like that Energy Star tag helps you choose your appliances, a new report says a rating symbol on the front of every soup can, cereal box and yogurt container could help hurried shoppers go home with the healthiest foods.

Thursday's report urges the to adopt new food labeling that clears the confusing clutter off today's packages and gives consumers a fast way to compare their choices.

It wouldn't replace the in-depth Nutrition Facts panel that's now on the back or side of food packages. But few shoppers stop to read or heed that fine print in the middle of the grocery aisle.

The Institute of Medicine says it's time to put right upfront the most important information for health: how many calories per serving - and just how big that serving is - along with stars or some other symbol to show at a glance how the food rates for certain fats, sodium and added sugars.

"American shoppers are busy shoppers," said Ellen Wartella, a psychology professor at Northwestern University who chaired the IOM committee that studied the issue at the government's request.

"We want a really simple system that says if you have three marks, that product is healthier than one with two marks."

How to get Americans to eat more wisely is a huge problem as obesity and diet-related diseases are skyrocketing. The FDA already was working to change the food-labeling system to make it more user-friendly. The agency didn't say if it would adopt a ratings approach but called Thursday's report a thoughtful analysis that would help it decide next steps.

"FDA agrees consumers can benefit from a front-of-pack labeling system that conveys in a manner that is simple and consistent with the Nutrition Facts panel," said spokeswoman Siobhan DeLancey.

But the IOM's recommendation would face an uphill battle with who are pushing their own version of on-the-front and don't like the idea of ranking one food as healthier than a competitor's.

"We believe the most effective programs are those that trust consumers and not ones that tell consumers what they should and should not eat," said Scott Faber, a lobbyist for the Grocery Manufacturers Association.

Explore further: Organic food label imparts 'health halo,' study finds

shares

Related Stories

Organic food label imparts 'health halo,' study finds

April 27, 2011
Don't judge food by its organic label because "organic" doesn't necessarily mean good it's for you. Yet a new study by Jenny Wan-Chen Lee, a graduate student in Cornell's Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, ...

Recommended for you

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

Teens likely to crave junk food after watching TV ads

January 15, 2018
Teenagers who watch more than three hours of commercial TV a day are more likely to eat hundreds of extra junk food snacks, according to a report by Cancer Research UK.

Can muesli help against arthritis?

January 15, 2018
It is well known that healthy eating increases a general sense of wellbeing. Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) have now discovered that a fibre-rich diet can have a positive influence ...

Your dishwasher is not as sterile as you think

January 13, 2018
(HealthDay)—Your dishwasher may get those plates spotless, but it is also probably teeming with bacteria and fungus, a new study suggests.

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JRDarby
5 / 5 (1) Oct 20, 2011
The problem with the reductionist approach is that nutrition and physiology are complex. You can't reduce nutrition to "good and bad," and you certainly can't reduce it to "three out of three nutrition stars."

- You have to balance calories: you can't have too many or too few, and it's still not that easy; you have to measure caloric intake based on numerous factors from age and sex to activity level and periodicity of meals
- You have to balance the sources of calories: too many carbohydrates at one time promotes insulin resistance but too few can cause ketosis; too much fat at one time, especially repeatedly, can also cause problems; even too much protein can be bad.
- You have to balance vitamin and amino acid intake: you can eat a balanced number of carbs, fats, proteins, and calories and still be missing essential nutrients your body needs to accomplish its myriad physiological processes.

In short, if people want to be healthy they need to take the time to be healthy.
JRDarby
not rated yet Oct 20, 2011
If you disagree, please explain to me how a rating system like that proposed above would adequately ensure people are getting their FORTY TO EIGHTY essential nutrients in proper supply.

http://en.wikiped...nutrient

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.