Little progress on reducing pharmacare coverage disparities over past decade: research

October 6, 2011

Changes to provincial drug plans over the past decade did little to address the wide disparities among provinces in prescription drug coverage, according to an analysis by University of British Columbia researchers.

In an article published today in , researchers from UBC’s Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (CHSPR) assessed changes in provincial coverage policies over the past decade. They found that “catastrophic” programs – which require households to spend certain proportions of their income on prescription drugs before qualifying for coverage – are emerging across Canada with very different levels of coverage.

Under catastrophic drug plans, a two-adult household earning the median income in Canada ($75,880) would be required to spend $1,704 in B.C. before benefits kicked in; a similar couple in Manitoba would have to spend $3,564; and one in Nova Scotia would spend $8,746.

Several official panels, most notably the 2002 Romanow Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, have criticized the interprovincial variability of drug benefits. The First Ministers’ Meeting on the Future of Health Care in 2004 said “no Canadians should suffer undue financial hardship in accessing needed drug therapies” and decreed that “affordable access to drugs is fundamental to equitable health outcomes for all our citizens.”

Catastrophic drug plans are now offered in six provinces and appear to have become an implicit national standard for pharmacare. In addition to their widely varying out-of-pocket requirements, such plans – as opposed to complete, “first-dollar coverage” – limit the government’s financial obligations at the expense of people with chronic illnesses, says co-author Steve Morgan, an associate director at CHSPR and an associate professor in the School of Population and Public Health.

“Even the most generous of catastrophic drug program may represent a step backward in pharmacare policy because many households face high out-of-pocket costs year after year,” says Morgan, a pharmaceutical policy expert. He adds, “The limited public role in paying for drugs also restricts our ability to control rising drug costs.”

“Our findings reflect what appears to be a paradigm shift in drug benefit design that is not necessarily based on principles articulated by Canadians,” says co-author Jamie Daw, a policy analyst at CHSPR.

The researchers found more national consistency in the area of drug coverage for people receiving social assistance: four provinces provide first-dollar coverage and five others required only a small co-payment for such recipients. Drug coverage for seniors was more varied: Alberta and Prince Edward Island offer universal, premium-free, no-deductible plans for seniors, while all of the others use some kind of income-testing.

Given the high financial stakes involved (Canadians spent $30 billion on drugs in 2010) and persistence of wide provincial variations in coverage, the authors recommend greater cooperation between the federal government and the provinces in setting national standards for public drug benefits – something that could be taken up in the 2014 renewal of the 10-Year Plan to Strengthen .

Explore further: Canadians should demand commitments for pharmacare program, says CMAJ

Related Stories

Canadians should demand commitments for pharmacare program, says CMAJ

April 26, 2011
Canada needs a national pharmacare program and federal leaders must commit adequate funding, states an editorial in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

Health insurance doesn't always protect people from medical debt

July 1, 2011
In 2010, about 40 percent of Americans -- or 73 million people -- had trouble paying medical bills, up from 34 percent in 2005. Now, a new study confirms that having health insurance coverage is no guarantee against accumulating ...

Reducing drug funding to Medicare patients will lead many to stop taking their medications

August 16, 2011
The lack of financial assistance to cover the cost of drugs to Medicare beneficiaries (the US government's health insurance program for people aged 65 or over, which currently covers 50 million US citizens) could result in ...

Recommended for you

Despite benefits, half of parents against later school start times

August 18, 2017
Leading pediatrics and sleep associations agree: Teens shouldn't start school so early.

Doctors exploring how to prescribe income security

August 18, 2017
Physicians at St. Michael's Hospital are studying how full-time income support workers hired by health-care clinics can help vulnerable patients or those living in poverty improve their finances and their health.

Schoolchildren who use e-cigarettes are more likely to try tobacco

August 17, 2017
Vaping - or the use of e-cigarettes - is widely accepted as a safer option for people who are already smoking.

Study shows cigarette makers shifted stance on nicotine patches, gum

August 17, 2017
The use of nicotine patches, gum, lozenges, inhalers or nasal sprays—together called "nicotine replacement therapy," or NRT—came into play in 1984 as prescription medicine, which when combined with counseling, helped ...

In a nutshell: Walnuts activate brain region involved in appetite control

August 17, 2017
Packed with nutrients linked to better health, walnuts are also thought to discourage overeating by promoting feelings of fullness. Now, in a new brain imaging study, researchers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) ...

Federal snack program does not yield expected impacts, researchers find

August 17, 2017
A well-intentioned government regulation designed to offer healthier options in school vending machines has failed to instill better snacking habits in a sample of schools in Appalachian Virginia, according to a study by ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.