US Supreme Court to hear challenge to Obama health care

November 14, 2011 by Chantal Valery

The US Supreme Court Monday agreed to take up the case of President Barack Obama's landmark health care reform, which has come under fire from rival Republicans, in a move which could weigh on next year's elections.

The nation's nine top justices will "likely" hear the case in March, a court spokesman said, and are expected to rule on whether the reforms are constitutional by June, just months before the November presidential polls.

The court said they would consider a request by the Obama administration to declare the measure constitutional, as well as two cases challenging the law, including one brought by 26 US states and small businesses that want to strike down the totality of the reform.

Opponents say the most controversial feature of the law -- mandating that people buy health insurance or face a tax penalty -- violates individual rights as set out under the US Constitution.

A ruling against the legislation could be a major blow for Obama as he battles to win a second term.

But the White House said it was satisfied that the legislation, a key plank of Obama's 2008 White House campaign which passed into law amid much fanfare in 2010, was being taken up by the nation's top bench.

"We are pleased the court has agreed to hear this case," said a White House spokesman, Dan Pfeiffer, of the law which extended health coverage to an extra 32 million people and was the long-held dream of Democrats for social reform.

"We know the Affordable Care Act is constitutional and are confident the Supreme Court will agree."

The hearing on the case will last about five and a half hours, apparently "the longest in modern history," the court spokesman told AFP.

Republican opponents argue the government has no power to compel people to buy health insurance and Republican House Speaker John Boehner on Monday renewed his pledge to repeal the law.

"The American people did not support this law when it was rushed through Congress and they do not support it now that they've seen what's in it," he said in a statement.

Republican presidential hopeful Rick Perry also welcomed the court's decision to examine the legislation, calling it "an unprecedented overreach and an unconstitutional infringement upon individual liberties."

Analyst Ilya Shapiro said the case would be the most important examined by the court since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision which legalized abortion in America.

"Both ways, it will not be good for the president. If it is struck down, his major accomplishment of his first term is gone," Shapiro told AFP.

"If it's upheld, it would energize not only the Tea Party and the Republican base but independents that overwhelmingly don't like this law."

Another expert said the decision could be almost as significant as the Supreme Court's ruling in 2000 which handed the presidency to George W. Bush over his Democratic rival Al Gore.

"But I don't think it could have a direct effect on the election result," Elizabeth Papez said, adding the vote of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has been involved in many swing votes, could be key in the final decision.

Despite Obama's nominations to the Supreme Court of justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, the nine-strong bench, which acts as the nation's arbiter on the toughest legal and moral issues facing the country, has been viewed as one of the most conservative in decades.

Last year a controversial Supreme Court ruling lifted curbs on corporations, lobbyists, and special interest groups spending millions of dollars to back election candidates and influence outcome of US elections.

Lower court rulings have conflicted on the constitutionality of the health care law, and the top US court turned down two other requests to review the landmark legislation.

On November 8, a US appeals court upheld the constitutionality of health care overhaul, ruling that mandating that people buy health insurance or face a tax was not a violation of individual rights.

In August a federal appeals court in Georgia ruled that the individual mandate exceeded the powers of Congress, but also ruled that the remainder of the health care law was within the bounds of the constitution.

Explore further: US Supreme Court to decide Nov 10 on health care case

Related Stories

US Supreme Court to decide Nov 10 on health care case

October 26, 2011
The US Supreme Court will decide on November 10 whether or not to take up the case of President Barack Obama's historic health care law, court sources said Wednesday.

US appeals panel upholds Obama health care law

November 8, 2011
A US appeals court panel Tuesday upheld the constitutionality of President Barack Obama's landmark health care overhaul, in the latest legal challenge to the law which is expected to end up at the Supreme Court.

Obama asks Supreme Court to rule on health care

September 28, 2011
President Barack Obama's administration Wednesday asked the US Supreme Court to uphold his historic health care law, likely sparking an explosive legal showdown in the heat of the 2012 election.

US court deals blow to Obama health care law

August 12, 2011
A US court has dealt a new blow to the health care reform law seen as President Barack Obama's proudest domestic achievement, declaring its centerpiece provision unconstitutional.

US healthcare battle edges nearer Supreme Court (Update)

September 8, 2011
A second US appeals court upheld President Barack Obama's health care overhaul Thursday, but an earlier ruling against the plan means his signature reform is destined for the Supreme Court.

Recommended for you

Blowing smoke? E-cigarettes might help smokers quit

July 26, 2017
People who used e-cigarettes were more likely to kick the habit than those who didn't, a new study found.

Brain disease seen in most football players in large report

July 25, 2017
Research on 202 former football players found evidence of a brain disease linked to repeated head blows in nearly all of them, from athletes in the National Football League, college and even high school.

Safety of medical devices not often evaluated by sex, age, or race

July 25, 2017
Researchers at Yale and the University of California-San Francisco have found that few medical devices are analyzed to consider the influence of their users' sex, age, or race on safety and effectiveness.

Why you should consider more than looks when choosing a fitness tracker

July 25, 2017
A UNSW study of five popular physical activity monitors, including Fitbit and Jawbone models, has found their accuracy differs with the speed of activity, and where they are worn.

Dog walking could be key to ensuring activity in later life

July 24, 2017
A new study has shown that regularly walking a dog boosts levels of physical activity in older people, especially during the winter.

Study finds 275,000 calls to poison control centers for dietary supplement exposures from 2000 through 2012

July 24, 2017
U.S. Poison Control Centers receive a call every 24 minutes, on average, regarding dietary supplement exposures, according to a new study from the Center for Injury Research and Policy and the Central Ohio Poison Center, ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.