UQ research finds alcopops tax ineffective

A University of Queensland research team have evaluated the effectiveness of the 'alcopops' tax by studying binge drinking-related admissions at the Gold Coast Hospital.

The 70% tax was introduced by the Federal Government in April 2008 in an attempt to reduce binge drinking in young people.

The team's findings, published today in The , demonstrate the tax did not affect the number of alcohol-related harms observed on the Gold Coast.

Methodology and key findings:

- The research team studied whether the number of people aged 15 to 29 who presented at hospital with conditions related to binge drinking fell following the increase in alcopops tax

- The research team looked at presentation to the Gold Coast two years prior to the tax increase in April 2008, and two years thereafter. They compared the number of younger and older people presenting with the same of , in addition to the number of young people presenting with other conditions

- The team found no reduction in alcohol-related health consequences following the tax

- Raising the price of just one type of drink may not reduce alcohol-related harms

- Without question, taxation is one of the most effective approaches to reduce . Our findings provide further evidence for a more comprehensive approach to alcohol control that includes taxing all drinks equally by alcoholic content .


Explore further

Think before you drink, says research

More information: "Effect of the increase in 'alcopops' tax on alcohol-related harms in young people: a controlled interrupted time series." The Medical Journal of Australia. (DOI) 10.5694/mja10.10865
Citation: UQ research finds alcopops tax ineffective (2011, December 12) retrieved 5 August 2020 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-12-uq-alcopops-tax-ineffective.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments