Could brain size determine whether you are good at maintaining friendships?

February 2, 2012
Brain size bigger if you have more friends
Being popular is linked to an ability to 'mind-read'

(Medical Xpress) -- Researchers are suggesting that there is a link between the number of friends you have and the size of the region of the brain – known as the orbital prefrontal cortex – that is found just above the eyes.

A new study, published today in the journal , shows that this brain region is bigger in people who have a larger number of .

The research was carried out as part of the British Academy Centenary ‘Lucy to Language’ project, led by Professor Robin Dunbar of the University of Oxford in a collaboration with Dr Penny Lewis at The University of Manchester, Dr Joanne Powell and Dr Marta Garcia-Finana at Liverpool University, and Professor Neil Roberts at Edinburgh University.

The study suggests that we need to employ a set of cognitive skills to maintain a number of friends (and the keyword is ‘friends’ as opposed to just the total number of people we know). These skills are described by social scientists as ‘mentalising’ or ‘mind-reading’– a capacity to understand what another person is thinking, which is crucial to our ability to handle our complex social world, including the ability to hold conversations with one another. This study, for the first time, suggests that our competency in these skills is determined by the size of key regions of our brains (in particular, the frontal lobe).

Professor Dunbar, from the Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, explained: “’Mentalising’ is where one individual is able to follow a natural hierarchy involving other individuals’ mind states. For example, in the play ‘Othello’, Shakespeare manages to keep track of five separate mental states: he intended that his audience believes that Iago wants Othello to suppose that Desdemona loves Cassio [the italics signify the different mind states]. Being able to maintain five separate individuals’ mental states is the natural upper limit for most adults.”

The researchers took anatomical MR images of the brains of 40 volunteers at the Magnetic Resonance and Image Analysis Research Centre at the University of Liverpool to measure the size of the prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain used in high-level thinking. Participants were asked to make a list of everyone they had had social, as opposed to professional, contact with over the previous seven days. They also took a test to determine their competency in mentalising.

Professor Dunbar said: “We found that individuals who had more friends did better on mentalising tasks and had more neural volume in the orbital frontal cortex, the part of the forebrain immediately above the eyes. Understanding this link between an individual’s brain size and the number of friends they have helps us understand the mechanisms that have led to humans developing bigger brains than other primate species. The frontal lobes of the brain, in particular, have enlarged dramatically in humans over the last half million years.”

Dr Penny Lewis, from the School of Psychological Sciences at The University of Manchester, said: “Both the number of friends people had and their ability to think about other people’s feelings predicted the size of this same small brain area. This not only suggests that we’ve found a region which is critical for sociality, it also shows that the link between brain anatomy and social success is much more direct than previously believed.”

Dr Joanne Powell, from the Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, said: “Perhaps the most important finding of our study is that we have been able to show that the relationship between and social network size is mediated by mentalising skills. What this tells us is that the size of your brain determines your social skills, and it is these that allow you to have many friends.”

Dr Lewis added: “This research is particularly important because it provides the strongest support to date for the social brain hypothesis – that is, the idea that human brains evolved to accommodate the social demands of living in a big group. Cross-species comparisons between various monkey brains have already supported this, but our work is some of the first to show that people with larger social groups actually have more neural matter in this particular bit of cortex. It looks as though size really does matter when it comes to social success.”

Explore further: Monkeys with larger friend networks have more gray matter

More information: ‘Orbital Prefrontal cortex volume predicts social network size: an imaging study of individual differences in humans,’ is by Joanne Powell of the University of Liverpool; Penny Lewis of The University of Manchester; Neil Roberts of the University of Edinburgh; Marta Garcia-Finana of the University of Liverpool, and Robin Dunbar of the University of Oxford. It will be published on 1 February 2012 by the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

Related Stories

Monkeys with larger friend networks have more gray matter

November 4, 2011

New research in the UK on rhesus macaque monkeys has found for the first time that if they live in larger groups they develop more gray matter in parts of the brain involved in processing information on social interactions.

Managers have bigger brains

September 8, 2011

(Medical Xpress) -- Managing other people at work triggers structural changes in the brain, protecting its memory and learning centre well into old age.

Come here often?

August 5, 2011

To date, most social networking sites like Facebook and LinkedIn have relied upon the ‘friend-of-a-friend’ approach to try and determine which people may have connections with one another.

Recommended for you

A turbo engine for tracing neurons

April 27, 2017

Putting a turbo engine into an old car gives it an entirely new life—suddenly it can go further, faster. That same idea is now being applied to neuroscience, with a software wrapper that can be used on existing neuron tracing ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Feb 02, 2012
What this study omits is that in order to have many friends you need, first and foremost, a highly developed empathetic nature. Friends will constantly barrage you with complaints, problems, insecurities, perceived slights, and generally distorted perspectives that you will have to spend valuable time helping them straighten out- thanklessly. So go ahead- become everybody's friend with your big forebrain.
not rated yet Feb 02, 2012
Friends will constantly barrage you with complaints, problems, insecurities, perceived slights, and generally distorted perspectives

Dang. What kind of friends are those?
I just drink beer with mine.
5 / 5 (1) Feb 02, 2012
"Dang. What kind of friends are those?"

Why, they're my best friends.
not rated yet Feb 02, 2012
Being able to understand, what the people don't like could make you extremely unpopular.
1 / 5 (1) Feb 02, 2012
So Charles Manson has a big forebrain?
1 / 5 (1) Feb 02, 2012
Phrenology lives, thanks to the PRS peer review protocols.
1 / 5 (1) Feb 02, 2012
Friends will constantly barrage you with complaints, problems, insecurities, perceived slights, and generally distorted perspectives

Dang. What kind of friends are those?
I just drink beer with mine.

Women. And girly-men.
Feb 02, 2012
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
1 / 5 (1) Feb 03, 2012
This article is absurd. Who cares. I thought this site was about science, not trying to find out why people want friends, or do not want friends. Who cares. Stupid. Friends, in general, are supposedly a source of social pleasure, or something. I don't really know. But I do know that having friends is mind-numbing and exhausting in most cases. I do have one friend, who is interesting to share ideas with (also like me considered "crazy" or "weird"), but otherwise I find most people to be quite boring. I have zero friends in my own age group. Elders I do find occasionally interesting, and valuable as sources of knowledge. Otherwise, I perceive humans in the general populace as quite stupid (socially or otherwise).
not rated yet Feb 05, 2012
Don't take it so personally. Even if you have a small or underdeveloped orbital prefrontal cortex, you it still may be compensated in a different area(s) of your brain.
Robert Dole
not rated yet Feb 15, 2012
tadchem has no idea what he's talking about and Smashin_Z_1885 is in denial.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.