Distracted doctoring - is it really a concern?

February 8, 2012 By Dr. Runjhun Misra

Q: Facebook? Twitter? Gmail? A: None of the above.

Recently, there has been an increased discussion in hospitals and medical schools on “distracted doctoring,” a practice where patient care might be compromised due to the frivolous use of for non-medical purposes.

When physicians take the Hippocratic Oath at the beginning of their training, they are sworn to always do good and never knowingly do harm to a patient. To adhere to that oath, it is critical to be mentally present during all clinical encounters or you may miss a critical, life-impacting piece of information.

It is with that mindset that physicians always strive to pay the utmost attention during any patient-physician contact. Sure, smart devices might be used during that encounter, but always with the intention of furthering medical care giving. For instance, using an application on the smart phone to figure out the dose of a medication, or searching Pubmed to look up a study that the patient heard about.

For this article, I conducted my own informal poll among the dozens of clinicians I know and asked them whether they were ever distracted by a device for their own personal use. Responding to the survey, 100 percent of local physicians answered that during active times of patient care delivery, they were never on a smart device surfing non-medical websites.

As with anything, technology is a double-edged sword. On one side, it has the ability to advance medical care and provide data instantaneously – often leading to better . On the other, it does have the potential to distract physicians while they directly interact with patients. What physicians choose to do with new mobile technology is solely at their discretion, although it’s vital to stress that most don’t allow themselves the privilege of getting distracted. Distraction, in this profession, wouldn’t just mean an erasable mistake, it could cost a life.

Like the Sirens were to Odysseus, smart devices are to physicians. They might lure the weak, but with each patient they see, ward off the advances of , , and Gmail and push forward to UpToDate, where better medical judgments can be attained. Even though thousands of years have passed, bringing with them greater and more alluring distractions, I think Hippocrates would be pleased with most of his disciples today.

Explore further: Referral decisions differ between primary care physicians and specialists

Related Stories

Referral decisions differ between primary care physicians and specialists

September 19, 2011
How do physicians decide which colleague to refer their patient to? It differs depending on whether you ask primary care or specialist physicians, according to research from Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, ...

Breast cancer patients more satisfied when specialists share care management

December 15, 2011
Patients with breast cancer report greater satisfaction with care when their cancer doctor co-manages their care with other specialists. However, some specialists are more likely than others to share decision-making with ...

Study shows racial differences in doctors' unspoken language

January 18, 2012
(Medical Xpress) -- When communicating with white patients, black physicians may face greater challenges than their white counterparts, according to a University of South Carolina study.

Most cancer physicians reach out to bereaved family, caregivers

October 3, 2011
While the majority (70 percent) of surveyed cancer care physicians initiate contact with the bereaved family and caregivers of their patients who have died, over two-thirds do not feel they have received adequate training ...

Recommended for you

Exploring the potential of human echolocation

June 25, 2017
People who are visually impaired will often use a cane to feel out their surroundings. With training and practice, people can learn to use the pitch, loudness and timbre of echoes from the cane or other sounds to navigate ...

Team eradicates hepatitis C in 10 patients following lifesaving transplants from infected donors

April 30, 2017
Ten patients at Penn Medicine have been cured of the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) following lifesaving kidney transplants from deceased donors who were infected with the disease. The findings point to new strategies for increasing ...

'bench to bedside to bench': Scientists call for closer basic-clinical collaborations

March 24, 2017
In the era of genome sequencing, it's time to update the old "bench-to-bedside" shorthand for how basic research discoveries inform clinical practice, researchers from The Jackson Laboratory (JAX), National Human Genome Research ...

The ethics of tracking athletes' biometric data

January 18, 2017
(Medical Xpress)—Whether it is a FitBit or a heart rate monitor, biometric technologies have become household devices. Professional sports leagues use some of the most technologically advanced biodata tracking systems to ...

Financial ties between researchers and drug industry linked to positive trial results

January 18, 2017
Financial ties between researchers and companies that make the drugs they are studying are independently associated with positive trial results, suggesting bias in the evidence base, concludes a study published by The BMJ ...

Best of Last Year – The top Medical Xpress articles of 2016

December 23, 2016
(Medical Xpress)—It was a big year for research involving overall health issues, starting with a team led by researchers at the UNC School of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health who unearthed more evidence that ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.