Medical researchers recommend male circumcision

March 2, 2012

Penile cancer, HIV, HPV, syphilis and kidney inflammation are among a number of medical conditions whose risk can be lowered by the practice of infant male circumcision, says a study led by the University of Sydney.

The review of current international evidence for the benefits and risks of infant male circumcision is published today in the Open Journal of Preventive Medicine.

"This is the world's first evidence-based policy on infant circumcision and its authors include five Fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians," lead author, Professor Brian Morris, from Sydney Medical School at the University, said.

"The evidence in favor of infant circumcision is now so strong that advocating this simple, inexpensive procedure for baby boys is about as effective and safe as childhood vaccination".

The study points out that many common childhood conditions, including , will become rare if baby boys are circumcised in the first weeks of life.

Circumcision was found to protect men, and their sexual partners, from several common sexually transmitted infections, as well as cancers of the penis and cervix.

"The scientific evidence shows no adverse effects on sexual function, sensitivity, satisfaction or sensation - if anything the opposite," said Professor Morris.

The policy suggests that for maximum benefits, safety, convenience and cost savings, circumcision should be performed in infancy and with local anaesthesia. It claims that the risk-benefit analysis shows benefits outweigh minor risks by a factor of over 100 to 1.

"It is now up to state governments to ensure that bans on elective infant in are lifted without delay. And it is essential that the federal government revises the Medicare rebate so that this procedure is affordable for low-income families.

"The costs saved will be enormous, as this policy statement shows that half of uncircumcised males will suffer an adverse medical condition over their lifetime, and many will die as a result of diseases preventable by circumcision," Professor Morris said.

Explore further: Male circumcision lowers prevalence of penile precancerous lesions among African men

Related Stories

Male circumcision lowers prevalence of penile precancerous lesions among African men

July 28, 2011
A University of North Carolina-led international study shows that among Kenyan men, circumcision is associated with a lower prevalence of human papillomavirus-associated precancerous lesions of the penis. Human papillomavirus ...

Efforts to defund or ban infant male circumcision are unfounded and potentially harmful

October 4, 2011
Johns Hopkins infectious disease experts say the medical benefits for male circumcision are clear and that efforts in an increasing number of states (currently 18) to not provide Medicaid insurance coverage for male circumcision, ...

Calif. gov signs bill to prevent circumcision bans

October 3, 2011
(AP) -- California's governor has signed a bill that that will prevent local governments from banning male circumcision.

Recommended for you

Researchers see popular herbicide affecting health across generations

September 20, 2017
First, the good news. Washington State University researchers have found that a rat exposed to a popular herbicide while in the womb developed no diseases and showed no apparent health effects aside from lower weight.

Higher levels of fluoride in pregnant woman linked to lower intelligence in their children

September 20, 2017
Fluoride in the urine of pregnant women shows a correlation with lower measures of intelligence in their children, according to University of Toronto researchers who conducted the first study of its kind and size to examine ...

One e-cigarette with nicotine leads to adrenaline changes in nonsmokers' hearts

September 20, 2017
A new UCLA study found that healthy nonsmokers experienced increased adrenaline levels in their heart after one electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) with nicotine but there were no increased adrenaline levels when the study ...

India has avoided 1 million child deaths since 2005, new study concludes

September 19, 2017
India has avoided about 1 million deaths of children under age five since 2005, driven by significant reductions in mortality from pneumonia, diarrhea, tetanus and measles, according to new research published today.

Gulf spill oil dispersants associated with health symptoms in cleanup workers

September 19, 2017
Workers who were likely exposed to dispersants while cleaning up the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill experienced a range of health symptoms including cough and wheeze, and skin and eye irritation, according to scientists ...

Study suggests link between youth football and later-life emotional, behavioral impairment

September 19, 2017
A new study has found an association between participation in youth tackle football before age 12 and impaired mood and behavior later in life. The study appears in Nature's Translational Psychiatry.

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jackoper
5 / 5 (1) Mar 02, 2012
Why would anyone consider the statement "no adverse effects on sexual function, sensitivity, satisfaction or sensation - if anything the opposite" from someone that is missing the parts in question? I have the parts and they include stretch and touch sensors. One touches or is touched at these parts, one stretches or one is stretched at these parts and the result is pleasure. Remove the parts, the result is removal of pleasure from ones life for good. We now also know with certainty that the loss of nerves, the loss of the natural dynamics, the loss of all of that pen is tissue, all contribute to males having sexual dysfunction at a much younger age. This is harm and the STD data actually shows zero benefits.

Preventive medicine??? how about nerve damage and harm to the sensory system with a whole range of sensation and sexual and protective function lost. The lips, nipples and fingertips have similar touch sense. To take this away from a baby is creepy.
TLCTugger
5 / 5 (1) Mar 02, 2012
Most of the US men who have died of AIDS were circumcised at birth. NOT ONE national medical association on earth endorses routine infant circumcision.

Foreskin feels REALLY good. HIS body, HIS decision.
Sigismond
5 / 5 (1) Mar 03, 2012
Mutilation for preventive motive is undeontological and will always be.
JRi
not rated yet Mar 04, 2012
Circumcision is fine, as long as it is only carried out to adult males by their own will.
TomTobin
not rated yet Mar 09, 2012
How stupid can a person be, and still be called a researcher?
Morris is really pushing the envelope, in my opinion. I saw a presentation in which he recommended circumcision for bathroom splatter. I wasn't aware that bathroom splatter was a medical condition, or that it was unique to the uncircumcised. In his latest scintillating piece of research, he states that circumcision can prevent foreskin injuries. Um, isn't circumcision the ultimate in foreskin injuries? He also recommends it to prevent HIV, even though it doesn't prevent HIV. If it did, why do the US, Israel, and Ethiopia have circumcision rates above 80% in adults, and yet have among the highest HIV infection rates? Why do Finland, Japan, New Zealand, and Denmark not circumcise routinely, and yet have HIV infection rates which are one-tenth those of the US? Morris recommends circumcision to prevent HPV, penile cancer, and cancer of the cervix. He fails to mention there's a vaccine for HPV, which prevents those.
Mastoras
not rated yet Apr 04, 2012
Circumcision in the modern world. And a proposal and support of circumcision in US, a major western country????

Right. And then there's this terrifyingly high percentage of circumcised men in the US?????????

-.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.