People know more than they think they do, study finds

March 28, 2012, University of Utah
Group of Utah business students involved in problem solving exercise. Credit: David Eccles School of Business.

(Medical Xpress) -- The process of melding individuals into effective, problem-solving groups should involve empowering individuals to realize they have important ideas to share.

Dr. Bryan Bonner, an associate professor at the University of Utah’s David Eccles School of Business, believes the first step to building successful organizations is deceptively simple: self-realization by each participant of his or her unique knowledge and experience.

Bonner co-authored “Leveraging Member Expertise to Improve Knowledge Transfer and Demonstrability in Groups” with Dr. Michael Baumann, an associate professor of Psychology at the University of Texas in San Antonio. The study, published in February’s edition of the , concludes that “for groups to be successful, they must exploit the knowledge of their (individual) members effectively.”

“It doesn’t take much. All you have to do is have people sit there for a while and think, ‘What is it I already know about this, and how can that help find the solution?’” Bonner says. “People find they often know more than they think they do; they realize that they might not know the whole answer to the problem, but there are a couple things they do know that might help the group come to a solution.”

The researchers used 540 University of Utah undergraduate students, assigning half to three-member groups on one hand, with the remaining 270 participants working as individuals. Their task: arriving at estimates closest to the correct answers to such questions as the elevation of Utah’s King’s Peak; the weight of the heaviest man in history; the population of Utah; and the minimum driving distance between Salt Lake City and New York City.

“We solve problems by using the many examples, good and bad, we’ve gathered through hard-won experience throughout our lives. The problem is that we’re not nearly as good at applying old knowledge to new problems as you’d think,” Bonner says. “Research over more than a century has tried, without much success, to figure out how we can do a better job.”

Bonner and Baumann, however, are convinced their study shows that “although the sheer amount of brainpower it takes to consistently and effectively transfer learning from old to new is beyond many individuals, groups of people working together can actually be very good at it.”

The answers to those study questions? Kings Peak, the highest point in Utah, is 13,528 feet above sea level; the heaviest man of all time was 1,400 pounds; Utah’s population, at the time of the study, was 2,389,039; and the shortest route between Salt Lake City and New York City is 2,174.41 miles.

Explore further: Is there a hidden bias against creativity?

More information: To read the paper, visit:

Related Stories

Is there a hidden bias against creativity?

November 18, 2011
CEOs, teachers, and leaders claim they want creative ideas to solve problems. But creative ideas are rejected all the time. A new study, which will be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of ...

Research states that prejudice comes from a basic human need and way of thinking

December 20, 2011
(Medical Xpress) -- Where does prejudice come from? Not from ideology, say the authors of a new paper. Instead, prejudice stems from a deeper psychological need, associated with a particular way of thinking. People who aren’t ...

Men get ahead for being 'disagreeable' in the workplace; women don't

August 4, 2011
In the workplace they do, according to new research co-authored by University of Notre Dame Management Professor Timothy Judge. But there also is a double standard for women and, yes, a pay gap.

Recommended for you

Study listens in on speech development in early childhood

January 15, 2018
If you've ever listened in on two toddlers at play, you might have wondered how much of their babbling might get lost in translation. A new study from the University of Toronto provides surprising insights into how much children ...

Study suggests people dislike you more for humblebragging than for regular boasting

January 12, 2018
A team of researchers from Harvard University and UNC-Chapel Hill has conducted a study regarding humblebragging—in which a person boasts about an achievement but tries to make it sound less boastful by minimizing it—and ...

Can writing your 'to-do's' help you to doze? Study suggests jotting down tasks can speed the trip to dreamland

January 11, 2018
Writing a "to-do" list at bedtime may aid in falling asleep, according to a Baylor University study. Research compared sleep patterns of participants who took five minutes to write down upcoming duties versus participants ...

Study identifies brain circuit controlling social behavior

January 11, 2018
A new study by researchers at Roche in Basel, Switzerland has identified a key brain region of the neural circuit that controls social behavior. Increasing the activity of this region, called the habenula, led to social problems ...

Tamper-resistant oxycodone tablets have no impact on overall opioid use

January 11, 2018
The introduction of tamper-resistant opioid tablets does not have an effect on rates of opioid use or harms at a population level, according to a new study led by the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC) at UNSW ...

Suicides by drugs in U.S. are undercounted, new study suggests

January 11, 2018
The rate of suicides by drug intoxication in the United States may be vastly underreported and misclassified, according to a new study co-written by Mark Kaplan, professor of social welfare at the UCLA Luskin School of Public ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Mar 28, 2012
I guess...if you define "knowledge" as estimating weights and distances...kind like the circus...
not rated yet Mar 28, 2012
You can always rely on a committee to find the lowest common denominator.
1 / 5 (2) Mar 28, 2012
Again, an "experiment" designed to "prove" what the "researchers" want to "prove". Basically, what they really want to do is convey the idea of corporate assigned teams respecting everyone's opinion and inevitably arriving at the most intelligent solution. So they provide a task for the teams that has nothing to do what what real teams usually do, namely, frame a strategy in a novel situation! When you're guessing at already established facts, one form of interaction takes place, emphasizing the impression of knowledge on the part of every member. In most cases, though, such teams operate by the most conniving smarming their way around at least most others to the position of "head" and "only" member, then proceeds to promote the most underhanded way to success, taking sole credit for any acxtual thinking demonstrated.
not rated yet Mar 28, 2012
In most cases, though, such teams operate by the most conniving smarming their way around at least most others to the position of "head" and "only" member, then proceeds to promote the most underhanded way to success, taking sole credit for any acxtual thinking demonstrated.

Oh, you're talking about lawyers!!!
1 / 5 (2) Mar 28, 2012
In fact, the description doesn't apply just to lawyers, it's fairly epidemic throughout the corporate world today, from accountant firms to advertising to product design to tasked groups within individual industries. The "team player" mentality in corporations today is overtly designed to eliminate individual thought, even if they are the one with the unalterably right answer, and encourages the emergence of a team leader, ordering his underlings around. The fact that, frankly, products today are horrendous compared to years ago shows quality is not as important in the corporate world as just developing a powerful collection of cronies and this permits those already in power to isolate those who are craven enough fo them to work with. It identifies them, displays their character and gives them an extra layer to work through before being accepted.
1 / 5 (2) Apr 01, 2012
I find that generally there are two types of people - those who know little, but are constantly bragging about how much they know, and then there are those who know a lot, but refuse to admit how much they know.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.