The drugs don't work

December 20, 2012, University of Cambridge

(Medical Xpress)—Drugs that do not represent value for money or are medically unproven may be increasingly reaching one of Europe's largest pharmaceutical markets, according to research undertaken by Cambridge sociologist Professor Lawrence King.

Professor King and colleagues Dr Piotr Ozieranski (University of Leicester) and Professor Martin McKee (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) found that multinational companies are deploying their massive financial resources to capture stakeholders at every stage of the process for the scientific recommendation of drugs in Poland.

Through direct and indirect methods, many of which remain hidden from public view, some of the world's biggest pharmaceutical companies, as well as politicians, are exercising influence over the programme in Poland – which is overseen by the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AHTAPol).

Their ground-breaking findings are published in the December issue of Health Policy.

Professor King and his colleagues conducted more than 100 interviews with people on all sides of the process, as well drawing data from more than 270 scientific recommendations on drugs issued by the AHTAPol, which Poland's Minister for Health recently announced is in line to be replaced.

King said: "HTA (Health Technology Assessment) has traditionally been portrayed as a sophisticated scientific process providing quantifiable evidence-based recommendations for decision-makers, but our have found that HTA is not 'pure science'; the drug industry is a key actor in the process of issuing recommendations.

"Our research is the first to look at HTA in Poland, the country with the largest in and one which faces huge popular pressure at reimbursing – as well as suffering from an underfinanced .

"The influence exerted by multinational drug companies calls into question the validity of Poland's HTA, given some of these conflicts of interest we've uncovered."

Among the conflicts of interest were conferences, paid for and sponsored by pharmaceutical firms, in exotic locations such as Dubai. Drug companies also paid state experts to lecture, offered research grants and employed other incentives to win their hearts and minds. Other methods of interference included co-opting clinical experts, patient organisations and politicians to advocate drugs under consideration by the state authority.

The research showed that an increasing number of drugs were being recommended for reimbursement, even though more than 50% of the drugs were not deemed cost-effective at their current pricing. Furthermore, the AHTAPol found that for drugs positively recommended, the evidence supporting their cost-effectiveness was "not credible" in more than 25% of the cases, and was missing or lacking in more than 50% of the cases.

But perhaps one of the most worrying aspects of the team's findings was the scale of the brain drain from the AHTAPol to the private pharmaceutical sector, seen by King and his colleagues as one of the driving forces behind the ever-increasing number of recommendations for expensive and potentially ineffective drugs.

Dr Ozieranski said: "The most troubling finding from our research is the extent of privatisation of state expertise by the pharmaceutical sector. Our interviews and official data show the excellent experts, educated with public money, are almost immediately captured by the pharmaceutical industry – able to offer them a much better deal than the AHTAPol."

This loss of state expertise, coupled with the potential for 'insider knowledge' and personal connections being passed directly on to the biggest pharmaceutical companies, could be rectified by the installation of a 'cooling-off' period before state experts can jump ship to private jobs in the same sector, says King.

King and his colleagues were also concerned by examples of behind-the-scenes political interference, a problem not helped by the short institutional distance between AHTAPol and the Polish Government's Ministry of Health.

One interviewee, an AHTAPol official, said: "Sometimes there is political pressure on certain decisions, say, from various patient groups (often backed or created by the pharmaceutical companies) which accessed some places or organised media campaigns."

Another interviewee spoke of a Minister asking for a change in the legal status of a sizeable group of highly expensive reimbursed drugs – without any analysis or research.

Added Ozieranski: "Our research shows that political elites universally strive to retain control over the policy process while minimising their own accountability for controversial decisions."

However, despite the inherent problems in the HTA system in Poland, King and his colleagues maintain there is hope for the future, and hope their research can add to current debates around the provision of state-sanctioned drugs in Poland.

The authors highlight a few promising regulations introduced by the new reimbursement legislation in 2012. However, they note that not all improved standards for disclosure of conflicts of interests have not been implemented rigorously.

Drawing their conclusions, King and his colleagues suggest the following measures to improve transparency and increase the efficacy of new drugs reaching the marketplace:

  • Broader use of professional codes of conduct for experts performing HTA
  • Tighter regulation of job seeking and employment after leaving the public sector
  • Comprehensive disclosure and management of experts' conflicts of interest
  • Increased state support for patient and public involvement in HTA
  • Well-defined institutional separation between HTA and political decision-makers
Added King: "We have offered a comprehensive set of recommendations aimed at improving the transparency of the HTA system in Poland, focusing on the effective disclosure and management of conflicts of interest – only very few of which seem to be ever reported, recorded or captured.

"Our research talks about the dilemmas that can be identified in any country using HTA to assist decisions about the reimbursement of new drugs, in particular the role of the drug industry in HTA."

Explore further: Drug pushing in the New Europe

Related Stories

Drug pushing in the New Europe

September 23, 2011
An investigation by academic researchers has revealed how backroom deals and discreet pressure by pharmaceutical corporations are determining which drugs are delivered to hospital patients in Poland.

Leading European experts call for more rigorous scientific evidence for healthcare interventions

October 23, 2012
(Medical Xpress)—Leading clinicians and health researchers from across Europe say much greater emphasis must be placed on the scientific evidence for the effectiveness of treatments and other healthcare interventions to ...

Impact of Canada's Common Drug Review on drug listing

October 24, 2011
The number of drugs covered by public drug plans decreased substantially after Canada's Common Drug Review was introduced in 2003, and new drugs were listed more quickly in several of the smaller provinces, found a study ...

The respective roles of the public and private sectors in pharmaceutical innovation

December 15, 2011
The study identifies the respective contributions of direct and indirect government support in research and development of new pharmaceutical drugs.

Disclosure of financial conflicts of interest may worsen medical bias

April 24, 2012
"Journals, professional associations, clinical guideline developers, and others need to worry not just that disclosure provides a band-aid to the real problem of the [conflict of interest] itself, but that any attempt to ...

Recommended for you

In most surgery patients, length of opioid prescription, number of refills spell highest risk for misuse

January 17, 2018
The possible link between physicians' opioid prescription patterns and subsequent abuse has occupied the attention of a nation in the throes of an opioid crisis looking for ways to stem what experts have dubbed an epidemic. ...

Patients receive most opioids at the doctor's office, not the ER

January 16, 2018
Around the country, state legislatures and hospitals have tightened emergency room prescribing guidelines for opioids to curb the addiction epidemic, but a new USC study shows that approach diverts attention from the main ...

FDA bans use of opioid-containing cough meds by kids

January 12, 2018
(HealthDay)—Trying to put a dent in the ongoing opioid addiction crisis, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Thursday slapped strict new restrictions on the use of opioid-containing cold and cough products by kids.

Taking ibuprofen for long periods found to alter human testicular physiology

January 9, 2018
A team of researchers from Denmark and France has found that taking regular doses of the pain reliever ibuprofen over a long period of time can lead to a disorder in men called compensated hypogonadism. In their paper published ...

Nearly one-third of Canadians have used opioids: study

January 9, 2018
Nearly one in three Canadians (29 percent) have used "some form of opioids" in the past five years, according to data released Tuesday as widespread fentanyl overdoses continue to kill.

Growing opioid epidemic forcing more children into foster care

January 8, 2018
The opioid epidemic has become so severe it's considered a national public health emergency. Addiction to prescription painkillers, such as oxycodone and morphine, has contributed to a dramatic rise in overdose deaths and ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.