ERA results: Medical research is Australia's best

December 6, 2012 by Megan Clement, The Conversation
A new report shows that medical research in Australia is world-leading. Credit: Shutterstock

Australia's medical and health sciences are leading the country in research quality, according to the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) report.

The report, conducted by the Australian Research Council, assessed universities on the quality of research conducted across individual disciplines.

These were given a score between one and five, indicating how they measured up to world standards. A score of one represents research that is "well below" world standard, three is at world standard, and five is "well above" world standard.

Medical and health sciences scored at well above world standard across eight universities.

, and history also scored highly, with six universities performing well above world standard.

International competition

Minister for Tertiary Education Chris Evans said the results show Australia is on track to achieve the goal of having ten universities in the world's top 100 by 2025, as set out by the government in the Asian Century White Paper.

But ARC chief Aidan Byrne, who presented the results in Melbourne today, said performance in ERA should not be equated with international .

"ERA is not a ranking, it's an evaluation of research and research quality across all institutions across all discipline areas," he said.

"There's a lot of detail and nuance that you have to understand [in research] and you make a if you just elevate that to one number."

"That's unfortunately what world rankings do; institutions criticise that but they use them anyway because there's nothing else."

But Byrne did say ERA could help universities work out what is holding them back internationally.

"The exercise universities have to do now is to ask, 'OK, where are we strong? Can we reinforce that? And where are we weak?'"

Strengths and weaknesses

Professor Alan Pettigrew from the University of Melbourne's LH Martin Institute said the results were promising for the sector overall.

"From a preliminary view of the data, between 9 and 28 universities have been judged to be at world standard or above in their research outputs encompassed by the 22 fields of research in the ARC's analysis," he said.

"This breadth of discipline strength across a wide range of our institutions, and beyond the Group of Eight, is to be welcomed."

But the results also show gaps in Australia's research profile in some areas such as commerce and technology.

Technology received the lowest score for research quality, and only two universities were considered to be well above world standard in commerce and management.

Pettigrew said this was disappointing for the sector.

"These data also imply that there are many universities that either do not sufficiently participate, or are below world standard in their current research activity, in these same discipline areas."

"Is this an appropriate position or situation for Australia's higher education sector?"

Byrne said technology's low score could be accounted for by universities classifying their research as part of engineering instead.

Meanwhile, he said commerce was dominated by teaching, not research.

"What we're seeing is a discipline that has got a lot of people in it, but a lot of those people are primarily focused on educational activities, which is actually very important."

"If you think about the impact that discipline might have in the broader community, training good accountants and training people in commerce and management at a high level has enormous direct impact into the economy."

"But their research activity may not be the dominant activity that they have."

Past mistakes

The first round of ERA evaluation in 2010 was met with a mixed reaction from the university sector.

The 2010 report was criticised for undervaluing the humanities, and using an approach to journal ranking that encouraged universities to "game the system".

This time, the journal rankings were abandoned, and the peer review process for rating the humanities was reformed.

Byrne said the approach to the humanities had improved in 2012.

"We've shown that there is quality research in the humanities in Australia," he said. "We've got better at it."

"I'm not going to boast that we're perfect, but we have got a lot better."

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Women run faster after taking newly developed supplement, study finds

January 19, 2018
A new study found that women who took a specially prepared blend of minerals and nutrients for a month saw their 3-mile run times drop by almost a minute.

Americans are getting more sleep

January 19, 2018
Although more than one in three Americans still don't get enough sleep, a new analysis shows first signs of success in the fight for more shut eye. According to data from 181,335 respondents aged 15 and older who participated ...

Wine is good for you—to a point

January 18, 2018
The Mediterranean diet has become synonymous with healthy eating, but there's one thing in it that stands out: It's cool to drink wine.

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.