Compulsory treatment orders for mental illness need reviewing

March 27, 2013, Oxford University
Community treatment orders may not benefit psychiatric patients but involve significant periods of compulsory treatment.

(Medical Xpress)—Discharging mental health patients on community treatment orders after they have been involuntarily hospitalised may require them to be on long periods of compulsory treatment without any benefit for the patient, a new study has found.

Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) have been controversial since their introduction in the UK in 2008. An Oxford University study has now found they do not alter the likelihood of being hospitalised again, compared with an older and less restrictive type of supervised discharge called Section 17 leave.

'This is the largest of CTOs, and we did not find any evidence that they achieve their intended purpose of reducing in so-called "revolving door" patients with a diagnosis of ,' says Professor Tom Burns of the Department of Psychiatry at Oxford University, who led the study.

He says: 'The evidence is now strong that the use of CTOs does not confer early patient benefits despite substantial curtailment of individual freedoms. Their current high usage should be urgently reviewed.'

The findings are published in the medical journal The Lancet.

CTOs were introduced for that are often repeatedly involuntarily hospitalised, leading to the idea of 'revolving door syndrome'. This group of patients are likely to have diagnoses of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, are often men, lead unstable lives, and experience and unemployment.

The measure was intended to address growing rates of involuntary due to in the UK. CTOs allow clinicians and mental health practitioners to monitor a patient's condition when leaving hospital after an involuntary admission, with the aim of providing a period of stability when relapse is considered likely.

Currently, around 4,000 people annually are made subject to a CTO in the UK, with perhaps 10,000 people on a CTO at any point.

Similar legislation has also been introduced in the USA, Australasia, some parts of Canada, and several other European countries.

However, several organisations have expressed concerns that CTOs are an unacceptable infringement on patients' civil liberties, as they allow specific conditions to be imposed on the patient, and that there is insufficient evidence to show that they are effective.

CTOs can include requirements that the patient takes certain medication, attends regular assessments, or lives in a certain place. If a patient breaks any of these conditions, the responsible clinician has the ability to recall them to hospital for up to 72 hours without formally readmitting them.

This is unlike the older provision of Section 17 leave, a period of leave from a hospital's inpatient unit which, if it goes well, is followed by discharge and voluntary treatment.

The OCTET study looked at whether 166 patients on CTOs experienced fewer hospital admissions compared with 167 patients released under Section 17 leave.

The Oxford University researchers found that the number of patients readmitted to hospital over 12 months did not differ between the groups. Just over a third (36%) of patients in each group were readmitted at some point.

Nor were there any significant differences in the time to readmission, or the number or duration of hospital admissions. The use of CTOs was not found to affect any of the patients' clinical or social outcomes.

But there was a great difference in the length of compulsory supervision of patients. Although the patients received equivalent levels of clinical contact, the patients on CTOs received compulsory treatment for an average of around 6 months. Those in the Section 17 group received compulsory treatment for an average of just over a week.

Professor Sonia Johnson of University College London, who was not involved in the study, comments in the Lancet: 'A strong respect for civil liberties is imperative for professionals entrusted with coercive powers, and arguments that CTOs infringe human rights seem persuasive if benefits cannot be shown.'

Explore further: Fewer mental illness beds linked with increase in involuntary hospital detentions

More information: www.thelancet.com/journals/lan … (13)60107-5/abstract

Related Stories

Fewer mental illness beds linked with increase in involuntary hospital detentions

July 7, 2011
The number of patients compulsorily detained in hospitals for mental illness in England has risen sharply as the numbers of beds have been cut back.

HF patients treated by a cardiologist, rather than hospitalist, have fewer readmissions

November 6, 2012
When a cardiologist attends to heart failure patients, even when the severity of illness is higher, patients have reduced rates of hospital readmissions, compared with those patients who are treated by a hospitalist, according ...

Emergency room redux for many patients after hospitalization

January 22, 2013
Following a hospitalization, patients face many challenges as they transition home. A new study of this vulnerable period published by Yale School of Medicine researchers in JAMA found that a substantial number of patients ...

Referral to talking therapies may cut use of health services and sick leave

October 3, 2011
Referring patients with mental health problems to talking therapies seems to cut their use of healthcare services and the amount of sick leave they take, suggests research published online in the Journal of Epidemiology and ...

Electronic discharge tool reduces hospital readmissions in heart failure patients

March 7, 2013
The use of electronic discharge orders aimed at providing evidence-based decision support and clear instructions to heart failure patients helped increase compliance with quality care measures and lowered hospital readmission ...

Readmissions frequent in month after hospital discharge

January 22, 2013
Following hospitalization for heart attacks, heart failure, or pneumonia, patients are at high risk of being readmitted for a broad spectrum of medical conditions in the month following hospital discharge, research at Yale ...

Recommended for you

Intensive behavior therapy no better than conventional support in treating teenagers with antisocial behavior

January 19, 2018
Research led by UCL has found that intensive and costly multisystemic therapy is no better than conventional therapy in treating teenagers with moderate to severe antisocial behaviour.

Babies' babbling betters brains, language

January 18, 2018
Babies are adept at getting what they need - including an education. New research shows that babies organize mothers' verbal responses, which promotes more effective language instruction, and infant babbling is the key.

College branding makes beer more salient to underage students

January 18, 2018
In recent years, major beer companies have tried to capitalize on the salience of students' university affiliations, unveiling marketing campaigns and products—such as "fan cans," store displays, and billboard ads—that ...

Inherited IQ can increase in early childhood

January 18, 2018
When it comes to intelligence, environment and education matter – more than we think.

Modulating molecules: Study shows oxytocin helps the brain to modulate social signals

January 17, 2018
Between sights, sounds, smells and other senses, the brain is flooded with stimuli on a moment-to-moment basis. How can it sort through the flood of information to decide what is important and what can be relegated to the ...

Baby brains help infants figure it out before they try it out

January 17, 2018
Babies often amaze their parents when they seemingly learn new skills overnight—how to walk, for example. But their brains were probably prepping for those tasks long before their first steps occurred, according to researchers.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Cjm1
not rated yet Mar 27, 2013
As far as research goes, this doesn't appear to be a stellar design. We already know that about 30% of people who present with psychosis cannot gain relief with current treatments. Medication and therapy don't keep them stable, so about 30% will be rehospitalized no matter what you do. Now, for the 70% of people who benefit from treatment, does a week of followup work better or worse than 6 months of followup? Does the that segment of the treatable population who receives a longer-duration care plan do better? The research isn't designed to address that at all, and that is the key metric needed to determine if too much care is being provided.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.