Studies confirm shorter radiotherapy course best option for women with breast cancer

September 18, 2013

The long-term results of the landmark START trials conclusively confirm that giving radiotherapy as a lower overall dose in fewer, higher doses over a shorter treatment time (hypofractionated) is at least as effective and safe as the current international standard for most women with early breast cancer.

"These 10-year results reassure us that 3 weeks of is as good as the 5 weeks still used in many countries, with less damage to nearby healthy tissue, as well as being more convenient for women (shorter waiting lists and fewer hospital visits) and cheaper for health services", explains study leader Professor John Yarnold from The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK, in The Lancet Oncology.

Between 1999 and 2002, the UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials recruited 4451 women from 35 radiotherapy centres across the UK. START A compared the international standard, a total dose of 50 Gy delivered in 25 small doses of 2 Gy over 5 weeks, with 41.6 Gy of 3.2 Gy and 39 Gy of 3.0 Gy given in 13 treatments over 5 weeks. START B compared the standard (50 Gy given in 25 doses of 2 Gy over 5 weeks) with 40 Gy delivered in 15 doses of 2.67 Gy over 3 weeks (hypofractionated).

Even after 10 years, tumour control rates in START A were similar between the three schedules, with very few women experiencing a relapse of their cancer—7.4% after 50 Gy, 6.3% after 41.6 Gy, and 8.8% after 39 Gy—and with much the same damage to surrounding normal (healthy) .

Likewise, in START B, the number of women whose cancer had returned in the breast remained similar in both schedules at 10 years (5.5% after 50Gy and 4.3% after 40 Gy). Moreover, with the shorter 40 Gy 15-dose schedule there was significantly less harm to healthy tissue, while the unexpected seen at 5 years persisted.

These outcomes were much the same irrespective of age, tumour grade, stage, chemotherapy use, or use of tumour bed boost.

According to Yarnold, "The upshot is that—contrary to conventional thinking—cancer cells are just as sensitive to the size of daily radiotherapy dose as the normal tissues responsible for late onset side effects, meaning that the continued use of traditional lower (2 Gy) doses spares the cancer as much as the healthy tissue, offering no benefit to patients. Our results support the continued use of 40 Gy in 15 fractions, which has already been adopted as the standard of care by most UK centres."

Explore further: Hypofractionated radiotherapy was safe, effective for early breast cancer treatment at 10-year follow-up

More information: www.thelancet.com/journals/lan … (13)70386-3/abstract

Related Stories

Hypofractionated radiotherapy was safe, effective for early breast cancer treatment at 10-year follow-up

December 7, 2012
Appropriately dosed hypofractionated radiotherapy was gentle on healthy tissues and effective in controlling local-regional early breast cancer, according to 10-year follow-up results from the U.K. Standardization of Breast ...

Fewer, larger radiotherapy doses prove safe for prostate cancer patients

December 13, 2011
(Medical Xpress) -- Less overall radiotherapy, delivered in fewer but higher doses, is as safe as standard, lower doses for treating prostate cancer, according to new research published in the Lancet Oncology today (Tuesday).

Chemotherapy before radiotherapy for testicular cancer could reduce long-term side-effects

August 16, 2013
Giving men with testicular cancer a single dose of chemotherapy alongside radiotherapy could improve the effectiveness of treatment and reduce the risk of long-term side-effects, a new study reports. As many as 96% of men ...

Higher radiation dose does not help lung cancer patients live longer

October 3, 2011
A higher dose of radiation (74 Gy) does not improve overall survival for non-small cell lung cancer that has spread to the lymph nodes, compared to the standard radiation dose (60 Gy), according to an interim analysis of ...

Spinal radiosurgery ups risk of vertebral fracture

August 20, 2013
(HealthDay)—Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a common adverse effect in patients receiving spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), according to research published online Aug. 19 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Study confirms fewer, bigger doses of radiotherapy benefit breast cancer patients

December 7, 2012
A lower total dose of radiotherapy, delivered in fewer, larger treatments, is as safe and effective at treating early breast cancer as the international standard dose, according to the 10-year follow-up results of a major ...

Recommended for you

Breaking the genetic resistance of lung cancer and melanoma

July 25, 2017
Researchers from Monash University and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC, New York) have discovered why some cancers – particularly lung cancer and melanoma – are able to quickly develop deadly resistance ...

New therapeutic approach for difficult-to-treat subtype of ovarian cancer identified

July 24, 2017
A potential new therapeutic strategy for a difficult-to-treat form of ovarian cancer has been discovered by Wistar scientists. The findings were published online in Nature Cell Biology.

Anti-cancer chemotherapeutic agent inhibits glioblastoma growth and radiation resistance

July 24, 2017
Glioblastoma is a primary brain tumor with dismal survival rates, even after treatment with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. A small subpopulation of tumor cells—glioma stem cells—is responsible for glioblastoma's ...

Immune cells the missing ingredient in new bladder cancer treatment

July 24, 2017
New research offers a possible explanation for why a new type of cancer treatment hasn't been working as expected against bladder cancer.

No dye: Cancer patients' gray hair darkened on immune drugs

July 21, 2017
Cancer patients' gray hair unexpectedly turned youthfully dark while taking novel drugs, and it has doctors scratching their heads.

Shooting the achilles heel of nervous system cancers

July 20, 2017
Virtually all cancer treatments used today also damage normal cells, causing the toxic side effects associated with cancer treatment. A cooperative research team led by researchers at Dartmouth's Norris Cotton Cancer Center ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.