Journal retracts controversial GMO cancer study

December 1, 2013 by Monte Morin

The journal Food and Chemical Toxicology is retracting a highly controversial French study it published last year linking genetically modified maize to cancerous tumors in rats.

In a statement released from its Cambridge, Mass., offices on Thursday, publisher Elsevier said that upon closer review of the paper, editors determined that the experimental sample was too small to allow for clear conclusions.

Also, the type of rat involved in the experiment is known for high incidence of tumors, it said.

"Unequivocally, the editor in chief found no evidence or fraud or intentional misrepresentation of the data," the statement read. "However, there is legitimate cause for concern regarding both the number of animals in each study group and the particular strain selected."

The paper, titled "Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize," was published on Sept. 19, 2012.

It was quickly embraced by opponents of genetically altered foods and stoked debate over California's failed Proposition 37, which sought to require labeling for foods.

The research was led by Gilles-Eric Seralini, a professor at the University of Caen and founder of the nonprofit Committee for Research and Independent Information on Genetic Engineering.

On Friday, study authors said they were standing by their findings. They called the publisher's criticisms "unacceptable" and accused the journal of exercising double standards.

The researchers had studied 200 Sprague-Dawley rats, which were divided into groups and given different diets. A number were fed Monsanto Co.'s Roundup-resistant corn.

At the time the study appeared, geneticists were quick to criticize its sampling size and other methodologies.

On Thursday, Elsevier said that because of the controversy surrounding the study's findings, the journal's top editor made the rare request to review the authors' raw data, and that the researchers willingly complied.

"The low number of animals had been identified as a cause for concern during the initial review process, but the peer review decision ultimately weighed that the work still had merit despite this limitation," the Elsevier statement sad.

"A more in-depth look at the revealed that no definitive conclusions can be reached with this small sample size regarding the role of either NK603 or glyphosate in regards to overall mortality or tumor incidence. Given the known high incidence of tumors in the Sprague-Dawley rat, normal variability cannot be excluded as the cause of the higher mortality and incidence observed in the treated groups," the statement read.

Explore further: Six French academies dismiss study linking GM corn to cancer (Update 2)

Related Stories

Six French academies dismiss study linking GM corn to cancer (Update 2)

October 19, 2012
A controversial study that linked genetically modified corn to cancer in lab rats is a "scientific non-event," six French scientific academies said on Friday.

EU rejects French scientist report linking GM corn to cancer

October 4, 2012
The European Food Safety Authority said Thursday it cannot accept an "inadequate" report by a French scientist on a link between cancer and genetically modified corn.

EU rejects French report linking GM corn to cancer (Update 2)

November 28, 2012
The EU's food safety agency definitively rejected Wednesday a bombshell French report linking genetically modified corn to cancer, saying it failed to meet "acceptable scientific standards."

France will push for GM ban if cancer threat confirmed (Update)

September 20, 2012
France will seek an immediate EU ban on imports of a genetically-modified corn made by Monsanto if a study linking it to cancer in rats is deemed credible, Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said Thursday.

Recommended for you

Scientists block the siren call of two aggressive cancers

January 23, 2018
Aggressive cancers like glioblastoma and metastatic breast cancer have in common a siren call that beckons the bone marrow to send along whatever the tumors need to survive and thrive.

Boosting cancer therapy with cross-dressed immune cells

January 22, 2018
Researchers at EPFL have created artificial molecules that can help the immune system to recognize and attack cancer tumors. The study is published in Nature Methods.

Workouts may boost life span after breast cancer

January 22, 2018
(HealthDay)—Longer survival after breast cancer may be as simple as staying fit, new research shows.

Cancer patients who tell their life story find more peace, less depression

January 22, 2018
Fifteen years ago, University of Wisconsin–Madison researcher Meg Wise began interviewing cancer patients nearing the end of life about how they were living with their diagnosis. She was surprised to find that many asked ...

Single blood test screens for eight cancer types

January 18, 2018
Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center researchers developed a single blood test that screens for eight common cancer types and helps identify the location of the cancer.

Researchers find a way to 'starve' cancer

January 18, 2018
Researchers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) have demonstrated for the first time that it is possible to starve a tumor and stop its growth with a newly discovered small compound that blocks uptake of the vital ...

9 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

____________
Dec 01, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
BikeToAustralia
1 / 5 (5) Dec 01, 2013
More data, call in the Pied Piper and don't tell the GMO creaters. Oh wait, these rats are genetically modified organisms, right?
goracle
1 / 5 (5) Dec 01, 2013
Did Michael Mann switch to genetics now? Ah, no it's not him, just his Greenpeace buddies. Alas, fraud is still rewarded in climate science, to his million dollar a year advantage.

We should listen to the fact-less opinion of someone who cannot stay even remotely on topic?
____________
Dec 02, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
____________
Dec 02, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
____________
Dec 02, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
goracle
1 / 5 (5) Dec 02, 2013
@ ______________ does more than underscore, he/she scrapes the bottom with more off-topic drivel siphoned from the anti-science denialsphere.
Anyone who actually believes that multiple comments about climate science on a a story about a specific study about Genetically Modified Organisms is somehow on-topic, is serious deluded. It's more likely that they will take any opportunity to smear, distort and hijack a thread.
This article is about a study of GMOs.
Your comments are NOT about that study or about GMOs.
____________
Dec 02, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
____________
Dec 02, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.