Why do we need prescriptions for contraception?

December 5, 2013 by Jayne Lucke, The Conversation
Why should women not be in charge of their own contraception if it’s safe for them to do so? Credit: anoldent/Flickr

Women using the contraceptive pill currently require a prescription from a doctor and to return once a year to renew it. But recent research suggests the relative safety of this oral contraceptive means we should consider making it more freely available.

For many women, the current model can involve a fair bit of effort – significant forward planning to get an appointment before the prescription runs out, an often lengthy wait to see the doctor and a hefty consultation fee – for a few minutes in the doctor's surgery to have a prescription renewed.

A recent research article has stimulated debate about the value of providing women with , without having to go through all this.

While the position is supported by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Australian Medical Association has spoken out against the suggestion, even for experienced pill users.

But why shouldn't women be in charge of their own contraception if it's safe for them to do so? Let's consider some of the arguments for and against providing oral contraceptive pills over the counter.

Why it's a good idea – access

The requirement to keep returning to the doctor for repeat prescriptions can be expensive, and time consuming.

For young women, those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, and others who find it difficult to access the health system, these barriers can be considerable. Both doctors and patients can be embarrassed about discussing sexual matters.

Without easy access to effective hormonal contraception women may not use any birth control at all, or they may rely on less effective methods (such as condoms or the withdrawal method).

And anyway, the emergency contraceptive pill is already available over the counter at pharmacies in Australia, so why not include other oral contraceptives as well?

In the United States, up to 30% of women who don't currently use contraception, or use a less effective method say they would probably start taking the pill if they could get it without a prescription.

For some women, the doctor's visit is a significant barrier to using hormonal contraception, so making it available in pharmacies will lead to more, and more effective, contraceptive use, and fewer unintended pregnancies.

Why it's a bad idea – health risks

Taking combined oral contraceptive pills has potentially serious health consequences.

The most dangerous of these is blood clots. Although rare, the sudden death of a healthy young woman because of a blood clot is shocking. Sadly this can happen even with the current requirement for a doctor's prescription.

Although many doctors thoroughly screen women and inform them about oral contraceptive use, the quality of consultations is variable. Reasons why a woman shouldn't take the pill can be missed, or simply be unknown, particularly for young women.

Thorough Medical Eligibility Criteria have been developed to minimise the risk of serious adverse events from using oral contraceptives. Women with hypertension, migraines with aura, a history of venous thromboembolism, or smokers at age 35 years or older, for instance, are at higher risk of adverse events and should not take the combined .

Without proper screening by a doctor, there's a risk that factors that should stop women from taking the pill will be missed.

Why it's good – availability

Many women wish they could purchase their contraceptive pills over the counter.

In the United Kingdom, a pilot program evaluated the feasibility of community pharmacy providing combined oral contraceptives, progesterone-only ("mini") pills as well as information on and referral to long-acting reversible contraception.

Women participating in the study said they valued the convenience, anonymity, drop-in system, long opening hours and lack of waiting time.

Appropriately trained health-care professionals, including nurses and pharmacists, could effectively assist women with contraception. And they could do this using current eligibility criteria, just as doctors do.

Could concern about maintaining professional territories be denying women better access to contraception?

There's no reason why women couldn't get advice about their contraceptive options from pharmacies or other community settings. This advice could include referral to see a doctor or specialist as required

Why it's bad - sexual health screening

Doctors argue that having women visit them for a new pill prescription ensures they have a regular Pap test, breast examination and sexual health check.

While all these checks are undoubtedly important, there are many women who don't take the oral , so the logic of this argument is not entirely satisfying. It's akin to the suggestion that condoms or aspirin should be provided by prescription so men visit a doctor for prostate examinations!

What's more, in Australia, women are advised to have a Pap test every two years and those guidelines are currently under review in light of the effectiveness of the HPV vaccination program on cervical abnormalities. And we have evidence that rates of sexual health screening remain high among women who get oral contraceptive pills over the counter.

It's also worth noting that the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists states screening for cervical cancer or sexually-transmitted infections is not medically required to provide hormonal contraception.

There's more

The uptake of the very effective long-acting reversible contraceptives (such as IUDs and implants) is low in Australia. Evidence from the CHOICE project indicates women choose long-acting methods when offered good information and cost-effective access.

The low uptake in Australia may be an indicator that doctors are not able to spend time with women discussing all the contraceptive options available.

We need to provide easy access to contraception and contraceptive information, while balancing the potential risk for side effects and adverse events.

Perhaps the way forward is to trial providing the progesterone only pill over the counter for a start because most can take it with little risk.

What do you think?

Explore further: EU drug agency rejects French request on birth pills

Related Stories

EU drug agency rejects French request on birth pills

October 11, 2013
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) on Friday rejected a French request to tighten prescription guidelines on types of birth-control pills linked with a relatively higher risk of blood clots.

Contraception in women over 40

March 4, 2013
Despite declining fertility, women over age 40 still require effective contraception if they wish to avoid pregnancy. A review article outlines the risks and benefits of various contraceptive options for these women. The ...

Lack of birth control information poses danger for women on common acne drug, study finds

November 25, 2013
Women taking a widely prescribed treatment for acne, known to cause birth defects, are often not fully aware of their contraceptive choices, according to a new study from researchers at the University of Pittsburgh School ...

GPs' knowledge gap hinders uptake of long-term contraception

July 17, 2012
(Medical Xpress) -- General practitioners (GPs) lack the knowledge and ability to adequately provide long-term contraceptive care to women in their practices, according to new research.

Study adds to evidence on clot risks of non-oral contraceptives

May 10, 2012
A study published on BMJ website today adds to the evidence that certain non-oral hormonal contraceptives (e.g. skin patches, implants and vaginal rings) carry a higher risk of serious blood clots (known as venous thromboembolism) ...

Recommended for you

Mind-body therapies immediately reduce unmanageable pain in hospital patients

July 25, 2017
Mindfulness training and hypnotic suggestion significantly reduced acute pain experienced by hospital patients, according to a new study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Study suggests ending opioid epidemic will take years

July 20, 2017
The question of how to stem the nation's opioid epidemic now has a major detailed response. A new study chaired by University of Virginia School of Law Professor Richard Bonnie provides extensive recommendations for curbing ...

Team-based model reduces prescription opioid use among patients with chronic pain by 40 percent

July 17, 2017
A new, team-based, primary care model is decreasing prescription opioid use among patients with chronic pain by 40 percent, according to a new study out of Boston Medical Center's Grayken Center for Addiction Medicine, which ...

Private clinics' peddling of unproven stem cell treatments is unsafe and unethical

July 7, 2017
Stem cell science is an area of medical research that continues to offer great promise. But as this week's paper in Science Translational Medicine highlights, a growing number of clinics around the globe, including in Australia, ...

Popular heartburn drugs linked to higher death risk

July 4, 2017
Popular heartburn drugs called proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been linked to a variety of health problems, including serious kidney damage, bone fractures and dementia. Now, a new study from Washington University School ...

Most reproductive-age women using opioids also use another substance

June 30, 2017
The majority of reproductive-age and pregnant women who use opioids for non-medical purposes also use at least one other substance, ranging from nicotine or alcohol to cocaine, according to a University of Pittsburgh Graduate ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.