Some patients may benefit from hip resurfacing over replacement

February 28, 2014 by Jim Dryden, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Some patients may benefit from hip resurfacing over replacement
Hip resurfacing (left) preserves more of a patient’s thigh bone than a traditional total hip replacement (right). In hip replacement, a metal stem is run down the middle of the femur. Young, active patients were more likely to return to activities following hip resurfacing surgery than total hip replacement.

When a person loses mobility because of arthritis, surgeons can replace the faulty hip joint with a new one. A new study led by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis suggests that a different procedure called hip resurfacing may be a better option for some patients, particularly those who are young and active.

Hip resurfacing preserves more of a patient's thigh bone than a traditional total . The resurfacing implant also tends to be made completely of metal, unlike the implants often used in total , which are made of plastic and metal.

In a study of 806 active patients aged 60 and younger who had hip replacement or hip resurfacing surgery, researchers found that a year after the operations, those who had the resurfacing procedure reported that they were less likely to limp, experience thigh pain or perceive a discrepancy in the length of their legs. Those who had resurfacing surgery also were more likely to return to the activities that were the most important to them. These included distance running, walking for long distances and even high-impact sports like martial arts.

The study was published in the journal Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

"Hip resurfacing wasn't approved by the Food and Drug Administration until 2006," said first author Robert L. Barrack, MD. "The implants cost a bit more, the procedure is technically more challenging for the surgeon, and there potentially are some complications unique to the procedure, such as allergy or tissue reaction to metal particles, but these are very uncommon in properly implanted, FDA-approved devices.

Barrack is the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Distinguished Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery and co-chief of Adult Reconstructive Surgery at Washington University School of Medicine. He's also the chief of service for orthopaedic surgery at Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

He said for doctors to recommend hip resurfacing, it's important to demonstrate that a patient stands to benefit over traditional hip replacement. Earlier studies in Europe, Canada and Australia made claims that patients could be more active with fewer limitations, but other studies recommended against resurfacing, particularly in women and men of small stature.

Hip resurfacing only reshapes the surface of the hip joint, which is where the head of the thigh bone, or femur, plugs into the cup-shaped surface of the pelvis. In a total hip replacement operation, the entire femoral head and a portion of the femoral neck is removed and discarded, and a stem is inserted several inches into the middle of the femur (thigh bone) to connect it with the 's "ball and socket," where the head of the femur connects to the pelvis.

Some patients may benefit from hip resurfacing over replacement
The study found that total hip replacement (done in both hips in the top X-ray) was less likely to allow young, active patients to return to their previous levels of activity than hip resurfacing (bottom X-ray).

Working with surgeons from other leading centers, Barrack and his colleagues compared outcomes from total hip replacement to hip resurfacing. The operations were performed using several different types of hip replacement devices and the most commonly used hip resurfacing device.

The researchers surveyed patients who had received traditional plastic-and-metal hip replacement devices. But the study also looked at total hip replacement components that were metal-on-metal, devices that were ceramic-on-ceramic, replacement devices with large heads to fit into the hip socket, and others with smaller heads.

The surgeries were performed at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, the Anderson Orthopaedic Clinic in Virginia, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush in Chicago and the Center for Hip and Knee Surgery in Indiana.

The University of Wisconsin Survey Center collected data from telephone surveys of the more than 800 patients involved in the study. Those conducting the surveys didn't know which procedure a patient had undergone, helping to eliminate bias in the study's results.

Barrack and his colleagues compared people of about the same age with similar activity levels, using a scoring metric developed at UCLA. All of the patients who took part in the study had a UCLA activity score of at least 6 on a scale of 1 (least active) to 10 (most active).

"We wanted to ensure that every patient enrolled in the study had a very high activity score before being limited by hip problems," Barrack said. "When patients spoke to the surveyors a year after their operations, the vast majority of resurfacing patients had attempted to return to a high level of activity, but that wasn't true for hip replacement patients."

More than 70 percent of hip resurfacing patients reported that they hadn't limped in the past 30 days, compared with about half of patients who had total hip replacements. And only slightly more than half of hip replacement patients had attempted to walk for more than an hour during the past month, versus 68 percent of the resurfacing patients.

More than 90 percent of resurfacing patients reported that they had attempted to run in the months after surgery compared with about 70 percent of hip replacement patients. A quarter of those hip resurfacing patients reported successfully running more than a mile. The number was closer to 10 percent in the hip replacement group.

The resurfacing patients also reported less thigh pain. In a subsequent study presented in the fall at the annual meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, Barrack's colleague, Ryan M. Nunley, MD, assistant professor of orthopaedic surgery, reported that total hip replacement patients were more than three times as likely to have thigh pain than hip resurfacing patients.

"With a hip replacement, you have a stem that goes down the middle of the femur," Barrack said. "So it makes sense that if you're very active and you have a stem in the middle of your femur, you also may be more likely to limp or to have thigh pain."

Another recent publication from the Washington University group that followed hip resurfacing and hip replacement patients of similar ages and activity levels showed that hip resurfacing results in less bone loss over time.

Many of Barrack's patients come to him because they want rather than a replacement procedure, but he said that not everyone is a candidate.

"Surface replacement isn't for everyone," he said. "Only about 10 percent of patients are ideal candidates, and a study in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery recently recommended that most women and men of small stature avoid surface replacement, but if a person has arthritis without complications, is young and active and wants to return to a high level of activity after surgery, the data suggest there may be advantages to surface replacement over total replacement."

Explore further: Excessive sporting activity may impair long-term success of hip resurfacing

More information: Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Berend ME, Della Valle CJ, Engh CA, Parvizi J, Clohisy JC, Nunley RM. "Do young, active patients perceive advantages after surface replacement compared to cementless total hip arthroplasty?" Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. (2013) 461, pp.3803-3813, December 2013.

Related Stories

Excessive sporting activity may impair long-term success of hip resurfacing

February 8, 2012
In hip resurfacing the femoral ball in the hip joint is not removed, but instead is trimmed and capped with a smooth metal covering. Young and active patients with arthritis often choose hip resurfacing over total hip replacement ...

Study reveals 'unacceptably high' hip resurfacing failure rates

October 1, 2012
an alternative to hip replacement often recommended to younger patients – is prone to early failure in many instances, and should not be used in women, according to an Article published Online First in The Lancet.

Not all patients benefit equally from hip or knee replacement, study finds

April 4, 2013
Only half of people with arthritis who had a hip or knee replacement reported a significant improvement in pain and mobility after surgery, according to a new study led by Women's College Hospital and the Institute for Clinical ...

Study shows cost-effectiveness and benefits to patients of early hip replacement

February 21, 2013
Early access to hip replacement is cost-effective and provides significant benefits for patients' quality of life, a study has shown.

Hip implant patients with unexplained pain likely to have tissue damage

March 20, 2013
The cause of unexplained pain among metal-on-metal hip implant patients is more likely to be tissue damage than wear of the implant, Hospital for Special Surgery researchers have found. The study, performed by Dr. Danyal ...

Recommended for you

Best of Last Year—The top Medical Xpress articles of 2017

December 20, 2017
It was a good year for medical research as a team at the German center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, found that dancing can reverse the signs of aging in the brain. Any exercise helps, the team found, but dancing ...

Pickled in 'cognac', Chopin's heart gives up its secrets

November 26, 2017
The heart of Frederic Chopin, among the world's most cherished musical virtuosos, may finally have given up the cause of his untimely death.

Sugar industry withheld evidence of sucrose's health effects nearly 50 years ago

November 21, 2017
A U.S. sugar industry trade group appears to have pulled the plug on a study that was producing animal evidence linking sucrose to disease nearly 50 years ago, researchers argue in a paper publishing on November 21 in the ...

Female researchers pay more attention to sex and gender in medicine

November 7, 2017
When women participate in a medical research paper, that research is more likely to take into account the differences between the way men and women react to diseases and treatments, according to a new study by Stanford researchers.

Drug therapy from lethal bacteria could reduce kidney transplant rejection

August 3, 2017
An experimental treatment derived from a potentially deadly microorganism may provide lifesaving help for kidney transplant patients, according to an international study led by investigators at Cedars-Sinai.

Exploring the potential of human echolocation

June 25, 2017
People who are visually impaired will often use a cane to feel out their surroundings. With training and practice, people can learn to use the pitch, loudness and timbre of echoes from the cane or other sounds to navigate ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.