Standard ultrasound criteria needed in carotid artery stenosis

Standard ultrasound criteria needed in carotid artery stenosis

(HealthDay)—Standardization of the diagnostic criteria defining the degree of carotid artery stenosis is needed for carotid duplex ultrasonography, according to research published online April 15 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.

Edward J. Arous, M.D., of the University of Massachusetts in Worcester, and colleagues applied diagnostic criteria from 10 medical centers to interpret the carotid duplex ultrasounds of 31,025 arteries from patients with .

The researchers found that applying different sets of criteria from 10 institutions to interpretation of carotid duplex ultrasounds resulted in marked variation in the number classified as 70 to 99 percent asymptomatic (range, 186 to 2,201), 80 to 99 percent asymptomatic (range, 78 to 426), and 50 to 99 percent symptomatic (range, 157 to 781). If the decision to treat with revascularization was based on these interpretations, the costs of care would range from $2.2 to $26 million, $0.9 to $5.0 million, and $1.9 to $9.2 million, respectively.

"Differences in to interpret carotid ultrasound result in significant variation in classification of stenosis, likely leading to differences in the number and subsequent costs of revascularizations," the authors write. "This theoretical model highlights the need for standardization of carotid duplex criteria."


Explore further

CAS, CEA equally effective for long-term stroke prevention

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2014 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Standard ultrasound criteria needed in carotid artery stenosis (2014, April 18) retrieved 4 July 2020 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-04-standard-ultrasound-criteria-carotid-artery.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments