US experts urge focus on ethics in brain research (Update)

May 14, 2014 by Kerry Sheridan
Credit: Rice University

Ethics must be considered early and often as the field of modern neuroscience forges ahead, to avoid repeating a dark period in history when lobotomies were common, experts said Wednesday.

President Barack Obama sought the recommendations of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, as part of his $100 million Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative announced last year.

It is "absolutely critical... to integrate ethics from the get-go into neuroscience research," and not "for the first time after something has gone wrong," said Amy Gutmann, Bioethics Commission Chair.

However, the first of two reports due from the commission stopped short of establishing guidelines for research, saying that ethical issues "will not be extensively analyzed or resolved in this report."

Instead, it called for institutions and individuals engaged in neuroscience research, as well as government agencies and other funders, to integrate ethics early in research.

It also urged innovative approaches to integrating ethics, making sure ethics is introduced at all levels of education, and explicitly including ethical perspectives on advisory and review bodies.

Dark history

Gutmann said it was important to learn from the practices of the 1940s and 50s, when thousands of lobotomies were performed in the United States as enthusiasm swept the media and the medical field and the dangers were largely ignored.

The surgery involved poking holes in the skull and brain in an effort to alleviate symptoms of mental illness. The procedure often left patients incapacitated, and lobotomy was eventually discredited in the 1950s.

"In the case of the history of lobotomy, there was great hype and great damage done, so it is very important that we learn from this history," Gutmann told reporters.

Contemporary neuroscience is a relatively new field that includes research on Alzheimer's, traumatic brain injury, depression, Parkinson's disease and more.

All told, neurological conditions affect more than one billion people globally, the commission said in its report.

Science is moving fast on improvements in brain imaging, dementia research, deep brain stimulation to alleviate symptoms of Parkinson's disease, as well as electrical implants that could boost memory and brain function.

But each of these areas raises ethical concerns, including at what point people with dementia can truly give informed consent to researchers, and whether cognitive enhancements could be unfairly distributed in society, Gutmann said.

Advances in brain imaging could also lead to questions about privacy, amid fears that doctors and researchers could garner more information than intended about a patient.

The use of deep brain stimulation, a risky and sometimes controversial procedure that aims to cut back on tremors associated with Parkison's and is being explored for use in depression and obsessive compulsive disorder, should be rigorously studied "to separate hope from hype," Gutmann said.

Technology outpaces ethics

Commission member and neuroimmunologist Stephen Hauser said the field is poised to accelerate rapidly in the coming years, and that means all neuroscientists must be aware of the ethical questions involved.

"Not all neuroscientists are equally attuned," Hauser said.

Miguel Faria, a neurosurgeon and author who has written extensively on the history of brain research, agreed.

"Technology has outpaced ethical considerations and many young medical scientists have not been properly introduced to medical ethics," said Faria, who was not involved in the commission's work.

Faria said any ethics approach must be based upon respect for the individual, as doctors pledge according to the Hippocratic oath which includes vows be humble, respect privacy, and avoid harm.

On the other hand, pursuing a path based on population ethics is just as dangerous as having no medical ethics at all, he said.

"Why? Because it is centered on utilitarianism and monetary considerations rather than committed to placing the interest of the individual patient or experimental subject above all other considerations," he told AFP in an email.

Gutmann said the next phase of the commission's work is to examine more deeply the ethical implications of neuroscience research and its effects on society.

Explore further: Bioethics Commission on incidental findings: Anticipate and communicate

Related Stories

Bioethics Commission on incidental findings: Anticipate and communicate

December 12, 2013
Researchers conduct a memory study, scan a participant's brain, and find more than they bargain for: a tumor. What do the researchers owe the participant? What does the participant want to know? This is an increasingly common ...

Coming soon: A brain implant to restore memory

May 1, 2014
In the next few months, highly secretive US military researchers say they will unveil new advances toward developing a brain implant that could one day restore a wounded soldier's memory.

Considering the ethics of sex-work research

May 2, 2014
The increase of research focusing on sex work and health is not without its ethical concerns. Researchers have sometimes struggled with challenges related to consent, inclusion, privacy and confidentiality, especially working ...

Ethics of peds countermeasure research discussed

March 20, 2013
(HealthDay)—Pediatric research on medical countermeasures should present no more than minimal risk to participants, and should follow a specific framework if there is a minor increase over minimal risk, according to a perspective ...

Brain stimulation shows early promise against Alzheimer's

May 6, 2014
(HealthDay)—Four of six Alzheimer's patients responded to deep brain stimulation in a pilot study, German researchers report.

Alzheimer's prevention trial to evaluate, monitor participants' reactions to learning of higher disease risk status

March 19, 2014
A new clinical trial will soon begin testing whether early medical intervention in people at risk for Alzheimer's can slow down progression of disease pathology before symptoms emerge, as outlined in Science Translational ...

Recommended for you

Faulty support cells disrupt communication in brains of people with schizophrenia

July 20, 2017
New research has identified the culprit behind the wiring problems in the brains of people with schizophrenia. When researchers transplanted human brain cells generated from individuals diagnosed with childhood-onset schizophrenia ...

Scientists reveal how patterns of brain activity direct specific body movements

July 20, 2017
New research by Columbia scientists offers fresh insight into how the brain tells the body to move, from simple behaviors like walking, to trained movements that may take years to master. The discovery in mice advances knowledge ...

Team traces masculinization in mice to estrogen receptor in inhibitory neurons

July 20, 2017
Researchers at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) have opened a black box in the brain whose contents explain one of the remarkable yet mysterious facts of life.

Scientists discover combined sensory map for heat, humidity in fly brain

July 20, 2017
Northwestern University neuroscientists now can visualize how fruit flies sense and process humidity and temperature together through a "sensory map" within their brains, according to new research.

New study reveals contrasts in how groups of neurons function during decision making

July 19, 2017
By training mice to perform a sound identification task in a virtual reality maze, researchers at Harvard Medical School and the Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT) have identified striking contrasts in how groups of neurons ...

Healthy heart in 20s, better brain in 40s?

July 19, 2017
Folks with heart-healthy habits in their 20s tend to have larger, healthier brains in their 40s—brains that may be better prepared to withstand the ravages of aging, a new study reports.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet May 14, 2014
Who decides what is or isn't ethical? And on what basis? Why should anyone be entrusted with those decisions?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.