Lie detectors and the lying liars who use them

July 18, 2014 by Hassan Ugail, The Conversation
No, I did not get a manicure before coming here today. Credit: Shutterstock

As society becomes more and more dependent on machines to make important decisions, the use of technology for lie detection is becoming increasingly popular. But as much as we would like to rely on technology to give us definitive answers, humans may well always be able to beat the lie detector.

Authorities have traditionally been cautious about using but they appear to be warming to the idea. Lie detectors are most readily associated with the police but other authorities have started to get in on the act. Around 20 councils in England are already using or plan to use detector tests to try to identify fraudulent benefits claimants, and UK prisons recently announced that around 1,000 of the UK's most high-risk sex offenders are to undergo mandatory lie detector tests.

This is all somewhat surprising given that some of the technologies that form the very foundation of these devices simply aren't reliable.

Lying to ourselves

There are currently several options to choose from when it comes to technology. The best known method is the traditional polygraph test, which involves monitoring your pulse, breathing, blood pressure and skin conductivity to measure your physiological responses to questions. Other non-invasive technologies include analysing with computer vision techniques and measuring facial temperature profiles with thermal imaging systems.

There have been technological advances in recent years but none are foolproof. Most modern systems based on automated facial analysis rely on computer vision technologies to identify and track a face in real time and machine intelligence techniques to make decisions.

The system will first look at the expressions a person uses under normal, unstressed conditions and uses those as a baseline when they take the lie detector test. Cues such as asymmetries in facial expressions, shifting gaze and a changed rate of blinking are often associated with strong emotion so if the machine detects unusual variations from the baseline then it is often assumed that the subject is lying.

Reliability can be increased by incorporating various other features, such as voice and facial temperature profile. However, at best, these systems can still only identify when subjects are lying or telling the truth roughly 80% of the time. Our own experiments under lab conditions confirm this.

Lie detection is incredibly difficult even for humans. In general, we can detect a lie only about 54% of the time. But that in itself tells us something interesting, if a little dispiriting. We may not be very good detectors of lies, but as a species we are incredibly good at lying.

Our ability to deceive may even be what has enabled us to dominate the planet. Humans and animals lie for their own gain – be it to avoid danger or gain some sort of advantage over competitors – and can be associated with survival.

The more intelligent an animal is, the more likely it is to lie, which puts us humans right at the top of the ladder. Research has also shown that the best liars are also the best at detecting lies. So are humans becoming better and better at deceit? As a species we're certainly becoming more intelligent. A phenomenon known as the Flynn effect bears this out. IQ test comparisons indicate that between the 1900s and today, Americans have gained three IQ points per decade. That's something that anyone hoping to make a working lie detector should consider.

Given our increasing intelligence and the fairly basic methods used in lie detection, it seems unlikely that we'll produce lie detectors that can pass muster in the near future. We have yet to fully understand the underlying psychological processes of lying so asking a machine to code it is ambitious, to say the least.

Many will argue that until lie detectors can be made 100% foolproof, they should not be accepted in courts or used in decision making processes. However, the important point to note here is that modern lie detectors, especially those that are non-invasive, can serve as very useful tools which will assist and work alongside with experienced human interrogators. Whatever their future, lie detectors have already made their mark and are here to stay.

Explore further: How's your poker face? Why it's so hard to sniff out a liar

Related Stories

How's your poker face? Why it's so hard to sniff out a liar

May 19, 2014
As the annual World Series of Poker gets rolling in Las Vegas later this month, hopeful competitors will be buying in and getting their poker faces on.

British group unveils facial reading lie-detector

September 14, 2011
( -- A British team of researchers led by Professor Hassan Ugail of Bradford University have demonstrated a new type of lie-detector at the annual British Science Festival in Bradford. Instead of hooking people ...

True story: Not everyone lies frequently

December 13, 2013
Does everybody lie? We are taught that this is common sense and that most people tell little white lies. But perhaps this isn't true. A recent paper published in Human Communication Research found that many people are honest ...

The unconscious mind can detect a liar—even when the conscious mind fails

March 24, 2014
When it comes to detecting deceit, your automatic associations may be more accurate than conscious thought in pegging truth-tellers and liars, according to research published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association ...

Recommended for you

People with prosthetic arms less affected by common illusion

January 22, 2018
People with prosthetic arms or hands do not experience the "size-weight illusion" as strongly as other people, new research shows.

Intensive behavior therapy no better than conventional support in treating teenagers with antisocial behavior

January 19, 2018
Research led by UCL has found that intensive and costly multisystemic therapy is no better than conventional therapy in treating teenagers with moderate to severe antisocial behaviour.

Babies' babbling betters brains, language

January 18, 2018
Babies are adept at getting what they need - including an education. New research shows that babies organize mothers' verbal responses, which promotes more effective language instruction, and infant babbling is the key.

College branding makes beer more salient to underage students

January 18, 2018
In recent years, major beer companies have tried to capitalize on the salience of students' university affiliations, unveiling marketing campaigns and products—such as "fan cans," store displays, and billboard ads—that ...

Inherited IQ can increase in early childhood

January 18, 2018
When it comes to intelligence, environment and education matter – more than we think.

Modulating molecules: Study shows oxytocin helps the brain to modulate social signals

January 17, 2018
Between sights, sounds, smells and other senses, the brain is flooded with stimuli on a moment-to-moment basis. How can it sort through the flood of information to decide what is important and what can be relegated to the ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 18, 2014
Remember the 'English Nanny' trial, where the young woman stayed icy calm, was thus considered a liar and found guilty ? Then, at appeal, she over-emoted in the way a US jury expects of the innocent, and was cleared ??
not rated yet Jul 21, 2014
Detection of P300 events using EEG is pretty much foolproof for detecting lies if the right questions are asked.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.