Why ordinary people become heroes

August 18, 2014, Flinders University
Why ordinary people become heroes
Flinders PhD candidate Anna Hall is investigating the role of bystanders in medical emergencies. Credit: Shutterstock.

You've just witnessed a horrific car crash. Your heart is pounding, you're in shock. And the decision you make in the next thirty seconds could be the difference between life and death.

Will you help, or walk away?

The factors influencing a person's decision to provide assistance, or not, in a life-threatening are being explored in a new Flinders University study.

As part of her PhD, Anna Hall from Flinders' School of Nursing and Midwifery will interview witnesses to a range of real-life emergencies, including car accidents, heart attacks, fires and falls, to find out what motivated their decision to intervene before ambulance crews arrived on scene.

With ambulance on the rise due to increasing callouts, Ms Hall said the help provided by bystanders in the minutes before arrive could save a life.

"Nationally, there are more than 1.4 million every year," Ms Hall said.

"The number of callouts is increasing so ambulance response times are getting longer, with response times varying from 8.5 to 19.7 minutes in capital cities and 8.3 to 23.1 minutes in South Australia," she said.

"These extended response times mean that people who are at the emergency scene may be the difference between life and death for the victims.

"While paramedics do an incredible job, the victims still need to be alive when the paramedics arrive. Anything bystanders can do to help the victim helps the paramedics."

While she is still recruiting interview participants, Ms Hall said she suspects a range of factors influence a bystander's decision-making process, including shock and the fear of being sued.

"Witnessing a medical emergency can be extremely traumatic – these witnesses are potentially faced with broken bones, severed limbs, unconscious people or death.

"Sometimes they're in shock so they freeze. Sometimes they don't know what to do – or think they'll do more harm than good – and sometimes they're scared of being sued, which is a myth because Good Samaritan laws protect people from undue liability when they provide assistance, advice or care to another person in an emergency."

Now in her second year of research, Ms Hall says she was inspired to explore the issue after her brother, Joe, received life-saving care from a bystander following a serious car crash in 2009.

"He wouldn't be alive if it weren't for the witness who stopped to help when other people kept driving.

"It got me thinking, why do some people decide to help while others turn away?"

Study participants will receive information about counselling services, Ms Hall said, in case they are feeling traumatised by their experience.

"I'll be interviewing ordinary, everyday people who aren't health workers so it's important to conduct the research sensitively and provide pathways to support if they are suffering post-traumatic stress."

By gaining insights into why people choose to help or not, Ms Hall says she hopes her research will inform policy and debate on the role of bystanders in emergencies.

"Research shows that if a victim of an emergency receives first-aid before paramedics arrive they have an increased chance of survival.

"If we understand what goes through peoples' minds at the scene of an emergency we could potentially develop guidelines to alleviate their fears and ultimately encourage more people to help."

Explore further: 3Qs: Access expands to opioid overdose antidote

Related Stories

3Qs: Access expands to opioid overdose antidote

March 6, 2014
Drug overdoses are reportedly on the rise both locally and nationally. The Massachusetts State Police has reported 185 fatalities since Nov. 1, which doesn't include the large cities of Boston, Springfield, and Worcester. ...

Alcohol abuse increased one city's EMS costs by millions of dollars a year

August 7, 2014
So-called "superusers" of Emergency Medical Services (EMS)—most of whom had alcohol-related reasons for their EMS transport—generated millions of dollars in medical costs in one year alone in the city of San Francisco, ...

Does the ambulance service need more training in mental health issues?

August 1, 2013
Ruth Elliot, Senior Lecturer in the department of Mental Health and Learning Disability at the University of Huddersfield, has published an article discussing the need for a national 'Mental Health Pathway' to enable paramedics ...

Paramedics could help close state's health-care gaps

August 16, 2013
In a new report, the UC Davis Institute for Population Health Improvement (IPHI) recommends that the state launch pilot programs to test a new model of community-based health care that would expand the role of paramedics ...

For the sickest emergency patients, death risk is lowest at busiest emergency centers

July 17, 2014
When a medical emergency strikes, our gut tells us to get to the nearest hospital quickly. But a new study suggests that busier emergency centers may actually give the best chance of surviving – especially for people suffering ...

Improving bystander resuscitation following cardiac arrest could save 100,000 lives across Europe each year

June 1, 2014
A session at this year's Euroanaesthesia meeting will discuss how improving the skills of members of the public, including schoolchildren, in resuscitation following cardiac arrest could save up to 100,000 lives per year. ...

Recommended for you

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

Teens likely to crave junk food after watching TV ads

January 15, 2018
Teenagers who watch more than three hours of commercial TV a day are more likely to eat hundreds of extra junk food snacks, according to a report by Cancer Research UK.

Can muesli help against arthritis?

January 15, 2018
It is well known that healthy eating increases a general sense of wellbeing. Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) have now discovered that a fibre-rich diet can have a positive influence ...

Your dishwasher is not as sterile as you think

January 13, 2018
(HealthDay)—Your dishwasher may get those plates spotless, but it is also probably teeming with bacteria and fungus, a new study suggests.

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

freethinking
1 / 5 (2) Aug 18, 2014
The more conservative a person is, the more likely they are to help.
The more liberal a person is, the less likely they are to help.
The more progressive a person is, the more likely they are to rob and steal from the victim.

paul_ringo0815
5 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2014
freethinking, What is that information based on? Interesting but I'm wondering about how that was documented. Thanks.
freethinking
1 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2014
Paul,

http://dailycalle...iberals/

http://www.examin...e-cities

Marc Meredith, PhD, Assistant Professor of Political Science and Business Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, and Michael Morse, Research Fellow at Stanford Law School, stated the following in their Nov. 18, 2013 article "Do Voting Rights Notification Laws Increase Ex-Felon Turnout?," published in the Annals of the American Academy of Political Science:

"[In New York] ex-felons who are registered overwhelmingly register as Democrats. Of those discharge records that match to at least one voter file record, 61.5 percent match only to Democratic voter records. In contrast, 25.5 percent match only to voter records with no affiliation or an affiliation with a minor party, while 9 percent match only to Republican voter records.
freethinking
1 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2014
In the next election the only ones who will vote Democrat are:
1. The ignorant
2. Those that are just plain stupid.
3. The dead
4. Criminals
5. Criminal aliens
6. and Thief's
zaxxon451
5 / 5 (1) Aug 25, 2014
Paul,
http://dailycalle...iberals/


Please. Not only does Brooks use faulty methodology claiming causation, when there is only evidence of correlation, he also compares apples to oranges. Comparing the generosity of religious conservatives to secular liberals is nonsense. These conservatives are much more likely to regularly attend church and donate every Sunday (or more). Their deity requires at least 10% of their income. Donating to keep yourself in the good graces of your god is not generosity. It's doing what's required by your religion.
Vietvet
5 / 5 (1) Aug 25, 2014
Paul,
http://dailycalle...iberals/


Please. Not only does Brooks use faulty methodology claiming causation, when there is only evidence of correlation, he also compares apples to oranges. Comparing the generosity of religious conservatives to secular liberals is nonsense. These conservatives are much more likely to regularly attend church and donate every Sunday (or more). Their deity requires at least 10% of their income. Donating to keep yourself in the good graces of your god is not generosity. It's doing what's required by your religion.


Your sincere effort to reason with free(non)thinker is a waste of time. Facts wont dissuade his closed mind point of view.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.