UK study examines communication and end-of-life decisions

For many people, talking about end-of-life decisions can be very difficult. Although making choices about health care at the end of life is an important outcome of these conversations, recent research suggests that talking about end-of-life choices with family members in a way that pays attention to how they perceive themselves and maintains your relationship with them may be more important than actually reaching decisions.

Allison Scott, assistant professor at the University of Kentucky College of Communication and Information, focuses her research on the quality of communication about end-of-life health decisions. In her study published this year in Communication Monographs, "Enacted Goal Attention in Family Conversations about End-of-Life Health Decisions," Scott and co-author John Caughlin, professor and department head at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne, used a multiple goals theoretical perspective to demonstrate that the quality of communication about end-of-life decisions matters. Members of 121 older parent/adult child dyads (N = 242) engaged in an elicited conversation about end-of-life choices and reported their assessments of the conversation. Scott and Caughlin found that people who paid better attention to task, identity, and relational goals were more satisfied with the conversation, felt more hopeful after the conversation, experienced less hurt after the conversation, and felt less relationally distanced after the .

"The way an end-of-life discussion is negotiated has the potential to strengthen or undermine relationships," says Scott. "Family holds a great deal of potential for improving end-of-life , but this potential lies in the quality of the discussions."

Credit: Video produced by Reveal — University Research Media. 

Explore further

ACP releases High Value Care advice for communicating about end-of-life care goals

Citation: UK study examines communication and end-of-life decisions (2014, November 24) retrieved 16 January 2021 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments